Advertisement

Foundations of Science

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 325–336 | Cite as

Deductive and ampliative adaptive logics as tools in the study of creativity

  • Joke Meheus
Discussion

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that logic hasan important role to play in the methodological studyof creativity. I also argue, however, that onlyspecial kinds of logic enable one to understand thereasoning involved in creative processes. I show thatdeductive and ampliative adaptive logics areappropriate tools in this respect.

discovery creativity methodology adaptive logics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. D. Batens: 1986, Dialectical Dynamics Within Formal Logics. Logique et Analyse 114: 161-173.Google Scholar
  2. D. Batens: 1989, Dynamic Dialectical Logics. In G. Priest, R. Routley and J. Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent. München, Philosophia Verlag, pp. 187-217.Google Scholar
  3. D. Batens: 199+a, A Survey of Adaptive Logics. In D. Batens et al. (eds.), Frontiers of Paraconsistency, Research Studies Press, in print.Google Scholar
  4. D. Batens: 199+b, Extending the Limits of Logic. The Adaptive Logic Programme. To appear.Google Scholar
  5. B. Brown: 1990, How to be a Realist about Inconsistency in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 281-294.Google Scholar
  6. J. Meheus: 1993, Adaptive Logic in Scientific Discovery: The Case of Clausius. Logique et Analyse 143–144: 359-391.Google Scholar
  7. J. Meheus: 199+a, Inconsistencies in Scientific Discovery. Clausius's Remarkable Derivation of Carnot's Theorem. In G. Van Paemel et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the XXth International Congress of History of Science. Brepols, in print.Google Scholar
  8. J. Meheus: 199+b, Analogical reasoning in Creative Problem Solving Processes: Logico-Philosophical Perspectives. In F. Hallyn (ed.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science. Kluwer, in print.Google Scholar
  9. T. Nickles: 1980, Can Scientific Constraints be Violated Rationally? In T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 285-315.Google Scholar
  10. J. Smith: 1988, Inconsistency and Scientific Reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 19: 429-445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joke Meheus
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GhentGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations