Advertisement

Molecular Breeding

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 257–264 | Cite as

Transgenic resistance to the nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis conferred by Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing proteinase inhibitors

  • Peter E. Urwin
  • Aurora Levesley
  • Michael J. McPherson
  • Howard J. Atkinson
Article

Abstract

The level of resistance to the reniform nematode Rotylenchulus reniformis conferred on Arabidopsis thaliana by transgenic expression of proteinase inhibitors (PI) was studied over 40 days of infection. A cysteine PI differing from Oc-I expressed in rice seed by one amino acid (Oc-IΔD86) had a considerable effect. It reduced parasite density and fecundity to 65±4% and 31±8% respectively, relative to values for untransformed plants when expressed at ca. 0.4% total soluble protein. The overall reproductive success was only 19±5% relative to the controls. Similar expression levels of cowpea trypsin inhibitor, a serine PI, reduced the density of the females on the plants to 77±3% of control values but did not reduce their fecundity. There was no evidence for additive effects when both PIs were expressed as a fusion protein using a peptide linker. Both PIs in the fusion PI protein are known to be functional from our previous work. When developing on A. thaliana plants expressing the transgenic proteins the intact PI fusion protein of 22 kDa was detected in nematodes by western blot analysis. Similarly, R. reniformis females were observed to have ingested Green Fluorescent Protein (28 kDa). Demonstrating the ingestion of the fusion protein, which has been associated with additive effects of the two PIs against other nematodes, supports the observation that serine PIs are of less value than cysteine PIs for R. reniformis control. The effect of Oc-IΔD86 on R. reniformis was dependent on the level of expression of different A. thaliana lines in the range of 0.1–0.4% total soluble protein indicating that the upper level of expression is required for an effective defence. Virtual northern analysis with cysteine and serine proteinase gene probes from Heterodera glycines showed high transcript abundance of a serine proteinase in both pre-parasitic and parasitic stages whereas expression of the cysteine proteinase was more abundant in the feeding adult female. This study provides further evidence that cystatins represent a valuable source of control against a range of economic nematodes including Globodera, Heterodera and Meloidogyne and now including R. reniformis. Preliminary screening in A. thaliana provides a convenient guide for selection of transgenes against nematode pathogens of crops such as pineapple that have a prolonged regeneration period.

Arabidopsis thaliana cystatins inhibitors nematode proteinase Rotylenchulus reniformis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson HJ: Opportunities for improved control of plant parasitic nematodes via plant biotechnology. In: Beadle DJ, Bishop DHL, Copping LG, Dixon GK, Holloman DW (Eds.) Opportunities for Molecular Biology in Crop Production, pp. 257-266. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, UK (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson HJ, Urwin PE, Clarke MC, McPherson MJ: Image analysis of the growth of Globodera pallida and Meloidogyne incognita on transgenic tomato roots expressing cystatins. J Nematol 28: 209-215 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson HJ, Urwin PE, Hansen E, McPherson MJ: Designs for engineered resistance to root-parasitic nematodes. Trends Biotechnol 13: 369-374 (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benchekroun A, Michaud D, Nguyenquoc B, Overney S, Desjardins Y, Yelle S: Synthesis of active oryzacystatin-I in transgenic potato plants. Plant Cell Rep 14: 585-588 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bockenhoff A, Grundler, FMW: Studies on the nutrient uptake by the beet-cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii by in-situ micro injection of fluorescent-probes into the feeding structures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Parasitology 109: 249-255 (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caswell EP, Sarah J-L, Apt WJ: Nematode Parasites of pineapple. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J (Eds.) Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture, pp. 519-537. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clontech: Capfinder cDNA synthesis kit. Clontechniques 11 (4): 2-3 (1996).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DoiKawano K, Kouzuma Y, Yamasaki N, Kimura M: Molecular cloning, functional expression, and mutagenesis of cDNA encoding a cysteine proteinase inhibitor from sunflower seeds. J Biochem 124: 911-916 (1998).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goverse A, Biesheuvel J, Wijers GJ, Gommers FJ, Bakker J, Schots A, Helder J JN: In planta monitoring of the activity of two constitutive promoters, CaMV 35S and TR2', in developing feeding cells induced by Globodera rostochiensis using green fluorescent protein in combination with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 52: 275-284 (1998).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hepher A, Atkinson HJ: Nematode control with proteinase inhibitors. European Patent Application Number 92301890.7, Publication Number 0 502 730 A1. (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hilder VA, Gatehouse AMR, Sheerman SE, Baker RF, Boulter D: A novel mechanism of insect resistance engineered into tobacco. Nature 220: 160-163 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hussey RS, Grundler FMW: Nematode parasitism of plants. In, Perry RN, Wright DJ (eds.) The physiology and biochemistry of free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes pp. 213-244. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK (1998).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koizumi M, Yamaguchishinozaki K, Tsuji H, Shinozaki K: Structure and expression of 2 genes that encode distinct drought-inducible cysteine proteinases in Arabidopsisthaliana. Gene 129: 175-182 (1993).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lilley CJ, Urwin PE, McPherson MJ, Atkinson HJ: Characterisation of intestinally active proteinases of cyst-nematodes. Parasitology 113: 415-424 (1996).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lilley CJ, Urwin PE, McPherson MJ, Atkinson HJ: Characterisation of cDNAs encoding serine proteinases from the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines. Mol Biochem Parasitol 89: 195-207 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J: Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK (1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masoud SA, Johnson LB, White FF, Reeck GR: Expression of a cysteine proteinase-inhibitor (oryzacystatin-I) in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 21: 655-663 (1993).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McKerrow JH: Parasite proteases. Exp Parasitol 68: 111-115 (1989).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McPherson MJ, Ogel ZB, Stevens C, Keen JN, Yadav KDS, Knowles PF: Galactose oxidase of Dactylium dendroides: gene cloning and sequence analysis. J Biol Chem 267: 8146-8152 (1992).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pusztai A, Grant G, Brown DJ, Stewart C, Bardocz S: Nutritional evaluation of the trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4) inhibitor from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.). Br J Nutr 68: 783-791 (1992).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ribeiro A, Akkermans Adl, Vankammen A, Bisseling T, Pawlowski K: A nodule-specific gene encoding a subtilisin-like protease is expressed in early stages of actinorhizal nodule development. Plant Cell 7: 785-794 (1995).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan CA: Protease inhibitors in plants: Genes for improving defences against insects and pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopath 28: 425-449 (1990).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1989).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schenck S: Correlations of Rotylenchulus reniformis population densities with 1,3-dichloropropene dosage rate and pineapple yields. J Nematol 22: 753-739 (1990).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Siddiqi MR: Descriptions of Plant Parasitic Nematodes Set 1, No 5. Commonwealth Institute Helminthology. (1972).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sijmons PC, Grundler FMW, von Mende N, Burrows PR, Wyss U: Arabidopsis thaliana as a new model host for plant-parasitic nematodes. Plant J 1: 245-254 (1991).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sipes BS, Schmitt DP: Evaluation of pineapple, Ananas comosus, for host plant resistance and tolerance to Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne javanica. Nematropica 24 (2): 113-121 (1994).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Starr JL, Page SLJ: Nematode parasites of Pineapple. In: Luc, M, Sikora, RA, Bridge, J (Eds.) Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture, pp. 519-538. CAB International Wallingford, Oxon, UK (1990).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Urwin PE, Atkinson HJ, Waller DA, McPherson MJ: Engineered oryzacystatin-I expressed in transgenic hairy roots confers resistance to Globodera pallida. Plant J 8: 121-131 (1995).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Urwin PE, Lilley CJ, McPherson MJ, Atkinson HJ: Characterisation of two cDNAs encoding cysteine proteinases from the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines. Parasitol 114: 605-613 (1997).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Urwin PE, Lilley CJ, McPherson MJ, Atkinson HJ: Resistance to both cyst-and root-knot nematodes conferred by transgenic Arabidopsis expressing a modified plant cystatin. Plant J 12: 455-461 (1997).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Urwin PE, McPherson MJ, Atkinson HJ: Enhanced transgenic plant resistance to nematodes by dual proteinase inhibitor constructs. Planta 204: 472-479 (1998).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Urwin PE, Mø ller SG, Lilley CJ, Atkinson HJ, McPherson, MJ: Continual GFP monitoring of CaMV35S promoter activity in nematode induced feeding cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 10: 394-400 (1997).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vain P, Worland B, Clarke MC, Richard G, Beavis M, Liu H, Kohli A, Leech M, Snape J, Christou P and Atkinson H: Expression of an engineered cysteine proteinase inhibitor (Oryzacystatin-IΔD86) for nematode resistance in transgenic rice plants. TAG 96: 266-271 (1998).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Veerman ECI, van der Keybus PAM, Vissink A, van Amerongen A: Human glandular salivas: their separate collection and analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 104: 346-352 (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter E. Urwin
    • 1
  • Aurora Levesley
    • 1
  • Michael J. McPherson
    • 1
  • Howard J. Atkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Plant Sciences, Leeds Institute for Plant Biotechnology and AgricultureUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations