Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 141–153 | Cite as

Y2K: Legal Implications and Future Repercussions

  • Robert A. Prentice
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

The legal system will ultimately determine where much of the huge losses that will be occasioned by the Millennium Bug will land. Seemingly minor glitches, such as a computerized inventory control system's wrongfully rejecting an order of chemicals as expired since 1900 (when the real expiration date is in the year 2000) can create a myriad of lawsuits among manufacturers, suppliers, customers, software vendors and consultants, and insurance companies. No major producers or consumers of software will escape unscathed. Although software producers have grounds for optimism regarding the early rounds of litigation, it is likely that persistent plaintiffs' attorneys and concerned legislators ultimately will threaten a “litigation crisis” of unprecedented proportions. The software industry can fruitfully draw strategic lessons from the accounting profession's similar litigation crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s in terms of litigation strategies, lobbying efforts, and funding of useful academic research.

Keywords

Information System Control System System Theory Legal System Major Producer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aeh, Richard K. Is IS Ripe for Malpractice Suits? Journal of Systems Management 1990;41:23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arthur Andersen & Co., Coopers & Lybrand, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG Peat Marwick, and Price Waterhouse, THE LIABILITY CRISIS IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPACT ON THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION Aug. 6, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson John C, Jennings Marianne M, Reckers Philip MJ. The Presence of Hindsight Bias in Peer and Judicial Evaluation in Public Accounting Litigation. Torts & Insurance Law Journal 1993;28:461.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballman Donald R. Software Tort: Evaluating Software Harm by Duty of Function and Form. Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 1996/1997;3:417.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barker Colin. Y2K Bug May Prompt New US Laws for Developers. November 1998. Available at http://webserv.vnunet. com/www user/plsql/pkg vnu news.right frame?p story = 68395Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barki Henri, Rivard Suzanne, Talbot, Jean. Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk. Journal of Management Information Systems 1993;10:203.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bemer, Bob. Time and the Computer. Interface Age Feb. 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bender, David. Self-Help Options for Making Third-Party Software Y2K Compliant. The Computer Lawyer 1998;15:25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bily v. Arthur Young & Co., 3 Cal.4th 370, Cal.Rptr.2D 51, 834 P.2d 745 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonner, Sarah, Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna, Young, Susan. The Effects of Frequent and Fictitious Frauds on Auditor Litigation: An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Accounting Review Oct. 1998 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bordoloi, Bijoy, Mykytyn, Kathleen, Mykytyn, Peter P, Jr. A Framework to Limit Systems Developers' Legal Liabilities. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996;12:161.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caldwell, Bruce. The Year 2000 Double Take. Information Week May 18, 1998;171.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cappel, James J, Kappelman, Leon A. The Year 2000 Problem and Ethical Responsibility,: A Call to Action. The Information Society 1998;14:187.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    In re Caremark Int'I, Inc. Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959, 970 (Del.Ch. 1996).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cloyd C Bryan, Frederickson, James R, Hill, John W. “Motivating Factors in Attorneys' Recommendations to Sue Auditors: How Important is Causality?” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1996;15:185–218.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collins W Robert, Miller, Keith W, Spielman Bethany J, Wherry, Phillip. How Good is Good Enough?: An Ethical Analysis of Software Construction and Use. Communications of the ACM 1994;37:81.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A Day Late and (Many) Dollars Short. Business Week Sept. 7, 1998;8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    DiRuggiero, Patricia Haney. The Professionalism of Computer Practitioners: A Case for Certification. Suffolk University Law Review 1991;25:1139.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dopuch, Nicholas, King, Ronald R. Negligence Versus Strict Liability Regimes in Auditing: An Experimental Investigation. Accounting Review 1992;7:117.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dopuch, Nicholas, King, Ronald R, Schatzberg, Jeffrey W. An Experimental Investigation of Alternative Damage-Sharing Liability Regimes with an Auditing Perspective. Journal of Accounting Research 1994;32 (Suppl.):103.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gunn, Eileen P. A New Legal Target: The Millennium Bug. Fortune Apr. 27, 1998;438.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hanson, Daniel J. Easing Plaintiffs' Burden of Proving Negligence for Computer Malpractice. Iowa Law Review 1983;69:241.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hill, John W, Ramsay, Robert J, Simon, Daniel T. Audit Fees and Client Business Risk During the S & L Crisis: Empirical Evidence and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1994;13:185.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Humphrey, Watts. Software Industry Must Follow Same Quality Principles as Other Technological Industries. Software Quality Matters 1997;5(4):1.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huntress, John. Computer Problems Similar to the Millennium Bug That Have Already Happened. Available at http:// www.year2000.com/archive/similar.html.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, Jane J. Citicorp, Chase To Spend Millions On Millennium Bug. Wall St. J. Apr. 27, 1998;B11A.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinney, William R. Auditors' Liability: Opportunities for Research. Journal of Economic & Management Strategy 1993;2:349.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kinney, William R. Audit Litigation Research: Professional Help is Needed. Accounting Horizons 1994;8:80.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lys, Thomas, Watts, Ross L. Lawsuits Against Auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 1994;32(Suppl.):65–93.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    MacKinnon, Kevin S. Computer Malpractice: Are Computer Manufacturers, Service Bureaus, and Programmers Really the Professionals They Claim to Be? Santa Clara Law Review 1983;23:1065.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neumann, Peter G. Inside Risks: Certifying Professionals. Communications of the ACM 1991;34:130.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mykytyn, Kathleen, Mykytyn, Peter P, Jr., Slinkman, Craig W. Expert Systems: A Question of Liability. MIS Quarterly 1990;27.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    O'Connor, James E. Computer Professionals: The Need for State Licensing. Jurimetrics J 1978;18:256.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oz, Effy. Ethical Standards for Information Systems Professionals: A Case for a Unified Code. MIS Quarterly 1992;16:423–433.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Perlman, Daniel T. Who Pays the Price of Computer Software Failure? Rutgers Computer & Tech Law Journal 1998;24:383.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pieptea, Dan R. What Will the Change of the Millenium Do to Our data Processing Systems? MIS Q 1986;103.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pratt Jamie, Stice, James D. The Effects of Client Characteristics on Auditor Litigation Risk Judgments, Required Audit Evidence, and Recommended Audit Fees. Accounting Review 1994;69:639.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Radosevich, Lynda. Y2K Legal Games Begin: Companies Scramble to Shield Themselves From Costly Lawsuits. InfoWorld May 11, 1998;103.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roberts, Ed. Big Six Firms Branch Out to Create Lobby, Making Liability Reform Top 1993 Priority. Thomson' International Bank Accountant May 10, 1993;5.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sandberg, Brenda. Heading to Court With Cases of the Millennium. Cal Law Oct. 19, 1998. Available at http:// www.ljx.com/topstories/101998new2.htm.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sandberg, Brenda. Y2K Software Class Action Settles. The Recorder Oct. 14, 1998. Available at http://www.ljx.com/ topstories/101498new1.htm. [Sandberg II]Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stahura, Barbara. Jurors and Y2K. Y2K Today Oct. 28, 1998. Available at <http://www.y2ktoday.com/modles/news/ newsdetail.asp?id=473 & feature=true & type==> Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tiano, Joseph R, Jr. The Liability of Computerized Information Providers: A Look Back and a Proposed Analysis for the Future. Univ. of Pittsburgh Law Review 1995;56:655.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williamson, Miryam. Poor Quality Software Costs a Bundle in Memory, Lost Opportunities, and Irritation, But it Costs Less to Fix Than You Think. COMPUTERWORLD Aug. 18, 1997;78.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wojcik, Joanne. Y2K Claims May Yield Reinsurance Disputes. Business Insurance Sept. 21, 1998;12.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yourdon, Edward, THE RISE AND RESURRECTION OF THE AMERICAN PROGRAMMER, 1996;157–179.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zajac, Andrew, “As the Clock Ticks, Lawyers Spring Forth,” Chicago Trib Oct. 4, 1998;12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Prentice
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of Texas at AustinAustin

Personalised recommendations