Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 43–52 | Cite as

Population Structure, Mobility and Habitat Preferences of the Violet Copper Lycaena Helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: Implications for Conservation

  • Klaus Fischer
  • Burkhard Beinlich
  • Harald Plachter


We describe population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the butterfly Lycaena helle using a survey of the populations in the Westerwald area (Western Germany) and mark-recapture techniques. Three out of 83 recorded populations were intensively studied in 1995. In all, 1596 individuals (537 females) were uniquely marked. The average adult residence time was 8 days, the maximum 34 days. L. helle is extremely sedentary. Average distances between first and subsequent captures were 37 and 61 meters for males and females respectively. Population-specific differences are interpreted as being caused by the influence of barriers and corridors. The potential for colonization is regarded as poor, and isolated populations seem to be under a higher risk of extinction than other ones. Preferred habitats were abandoned moist meadows with rich aspects of Polygonum bistorta on sheltered, warm, and humid stands. Owing to the destruction of natural habitats (moorland) L. helle now colonizes almost exclusively anthropogenic ephemeral habitats (abandoned moist meadows) in Central Europe. This results in serious conservation problems, as the biology of the species does not seem to be adapted to a high turn-over rate of habitats.

butterfly metapopulation dispersal sedantariness habitat turn-over 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernardi, G. and De Lesse, H. (1952) La variabilité géographique de Lycaena helle Denis et Schiff. (Lep. Lycaenidae). Rev. Franc. Lépidopt. 13/14, 203–214.Google Scholar
  2. Brunzel, S. (1996) Populations ökologische Untersuchung am Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon L. 1758). Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz 5, 37–46.Google Scholar
  3. Brunzel, S. and Reich, M. (1996) Zur Metapopulationsstruktur des Roten Scheckenfalters (Melitaea didyma Esper 1779) auf der Schwäbischen Alb. Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz 5, 243–253.Google Scholar
  4. Cordero, C.R. and Soberón, J. (1990) Non-resource based territoriality in males of the butterfly Xamia xami (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J. Ins. Behav. 3, 719–732.Google Scholar
  5. Dennis, R.L.H. and Bardell, P. (1996) The impact of extreme weather events on local populations of Hipparchia semele (L.) (Nymphalidae) and Plebejus argus (L.) (Lycaenidae): hindsight, inference and lost opportunities. Entomologist's Gaz. 47, 211–225.Google Scholar
  6. Dennis, R.L.H. and Eales, T. (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J. Insect Conserv. 1, 167–176.Google Scholar
  7. Dennis, R.L.H. and Shreeve, T.G. (1997): Diversity of butter-fly species on British islands: ecological influences underlying the roles of area, isolation and faunal source. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60, 257–275.Google Scholar
  8. Dover, J.W., Sparks, T.H. and Greatorex-Davies, J.N. (1997) The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. J. Insect Conserv. 1, 89–97.Google Scholar
  9. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. and Paulissen, D. (1992) Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, 2. edition. Scripta Geobotanica 18, 1–258.Google Scholar
  10. Elligsen, H., Beinlich, B. and Plachter, H. (1997) Effects of large scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). J. Insect Conserv. 1, 13–23.Google Scholar
  11. Hannemann, J. (1928) Etwas über Chrysophanus amphidamas Esp. Int. Entomol. Zeitschrift 22, 209–210.Google Scholar
  12. Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M. and Nieminen, M. (1994) Metapopulation and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75 (3), 747–762.Google Scholar
  13. Hanski, I., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. and Lei, G. (1995) Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72, 21–28.Google Scholar
  14. Hasselbach, W. (1985) Lycaena helle - die Zucht einer in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vom Aussterben bedrohten Art (Lep.: Lycaenidae). Entomol. Zeitschrift 95, 70–76.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D. and Lewis, O.T. (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 725–735.Google Scholar
  16. Kockelke, K., Hermann, G., Kaule, G., Verhaagh, M. and Settele, J. (1994) Zur Autökologie und Verbreitung des Kreuzenzian-Ameisenbläulings, Maculinea rebeli. Carolinea 52, 93–109.Google Scholar
  17. Meineke, J.U. (1982) Einige Aspekte des Moor-Biotopschutzes für Großschmetterlinge am Beispiel moorbewohnender Großschmetterlingsarten in Südwestdeutschland. Telma 12, 85–98.Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, M. (1980) Die Verbreitung von Lycaena helle in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Lep.: Lycaenidae). Entomol. Zeitschrift 90, 217–224.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, M. (1982a) Révision systématique, chorologique et écologique de Lycaena helle Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775 (Lycaenidae). Linneana Belgica 8, 238–260, 345-358, 451-466.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, M. (1982b) Les races européennes de Lycaena helle Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775, et leurs biotopes (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Proc. 3rd Congr. Europ. Lepid., Cambridge 1982, 125–137.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer, M. and Helminger, T. (1994) Untersuchungen zu einer Population von Lycaena helle arduinnae Meyer, 1980 im nordwestlichen Ösling (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bull. Soc. Nat. Luxemb. 95, 315–326.Google Scholar
  22. Mühlenberg, M. (1989) Freilandökologie. Heidelberg, Wiesbaden: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
  23. Munguira, M.L., Martin, J. and Balletto, E. (1993) Conservation biology of Lycaenidae: A European overview. In Conservation biology of Lycaenidae (butterflies) (T.R. New, ed.), pp. 23–34. Oxford: Information Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, O.T., Thomas, C.D., Hill, J.K., Brookes, M.I., Crane, T.P.R., Graneau, Y.A., Mallet, J.L.B. and Rose, O.C. (1997) Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterfly Plebejus argus. Ecol. Entomol. 22, 283–293.Google Scholar
  25. Pauler, R., Kaule, G., Verhaagh, M. and Settele, J. (1995) Untersuchung zur Autökologie des Schwarzgefleckten Ameisenbläulings, Maculinea arion (Linnaeus 1758) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), in Südwestdeutschland. Nachr. entomol. Verein Apollo, N.F. 16, 147–186.Google Scholar
  26. Plachter, H. (1995) Functional criteria for the assessment of cultural landscapes. In Cultural landscapes of universal value (Von Droste, B., Plachter, H. and Rössler, M., eds.), pp. 393–404. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  27. Plachter, H. (1996) Central European approach for the protection of biodiversity. In Nature conservation outside protected areas (D. Ogrin, ed.), pp. 91–108. Conf. Proc. Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  28. Pretscher, P. (1984) Rote Liste der Großschmetterlinge. In Rote Liste der gef¨ahrdeten Tiere und Pflanzen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Blab, J., Nowak, E., Trautmann, W. and Sukopp, H., eds.), 4th edition. Greven: Kilda.Google Scholar
  29. Pullin, A.S. (ed., 1995) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Pullin, A.S. (1997) Habitat requirements of Lycaena dispar batavus and implications for re-establishment in England. J. Insect Conserv. 1, 177–185.Google Scholar
  31. Réal, P. (1962a) Les Pyrénées Orientales, refuge entomologique. Ann. sci. Univ. Besancon, 2e sér. Zool. 17, 97–110.Google Scholar
  32. Réal, P. (1962b) Les stations de Lycaena helle D. et Schiff. dans le Doubs. Note de faunistique jurassienne no 1. Ann. sci. Univ. Besançon, 2e sér. Zool. 17, 111–118.Google Scholar
  33. Réal, P. (1962c) Quelques remarques sur Lycaena helle D. et Schiff. dans les Monts de la Madeleine. Ann. sci. Univ. Besançon, 2e sér. Zool. 17, 119–120.Google Scholar
  34. Réal, P. (1962d) Lycaena helle D. et Schiff. (ex Heodes amphidamas Esp.) dans le Massif de Sancy. Ann. sci. Univ. Besançon, 2e sér. Zool. 17, 121–134.Google Scholar
  35. Rutowski, R.L. (1991) The evolution of male mate-location behaviour in butterflies. Amer. Naturalist 138, 1121–1139.Google Scholar
  36. Sabel, K.-J. and Fischer, E. (1992) Boden-und vegetationsgeographische Untersuchungen im Westerwald. Frankfurter geowiss. Arbeiten, D 7, 1–268.Google Scholar
  37. SBN (Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, ed.) (1987) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Arten-Gefährdung-Schutz. - 2nd edition. Basel: SBN.Google Scholar
  38. Schurian, K.G. and Fiedler, K. (1996) Adult behaviour and early stages of Lycaena ochimus (Herrich-Schäfer [1851]) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nachr. entomol. Verein Apollo, N.F. 16, 329–343.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, J.A. (1974) Population biology and adult behaviour of Lycaena arota (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Society 28, 64–75.Google Scholar
  40. Scott, J.A. and Opler, P.A. (1975) Population biology and adult behavior of Lycaena xanthoides (Lycaenidae). J. Lepid. Society 29, 63–66.Google Scholar
  41. Settele, J., Henle, K. and Bender, C. (1996) Metapopulationen und Biotopverbund: Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Schmetterlingen und Reptilien. Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz: 5, 187–206.Google Scholar
  42. Settele, J., Margules, C., Poschlod, P. and Henle, K. (eds., 1996) Species dispersal in fragmented landscapes. Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar
  43. Shreeve, T.G. (1992) Adult behaviour. In The ecology of butter-flies in Britain (R.L.H. Dennis, ed.), pp. 22 ff. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Southwood, T.R.E. (1976) Ecological methods, 2nd edition. London, New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, C.D. and Harrison, S. (1992) Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J. Animal Ecol. 61, 437–446.Google Scholar
  46. Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. and Warren, M.S. (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92, 563–567.Google Scholar
  47. Väisänen, R., Kuussaari, M. Nieminen, M. and Somerma, P. (1994) Biology and conservation of Pseudophilotes baton in Finland (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Ann. Zool. Fennici 31, 145–156.Google Scholar
  48. Watt, W.B., Chew, F.S., Snyder, C.R.G., Watt, A.G. and Rothschild, D.E. (1977) Population structure of pierid butterflies I. Numbers and movements of some Colias species. Oecologia 27, 1–22.Google Scholar
  49. Weidemann, H.J. (1995) Tagfalter beobachten, bestimmen, 2nd edition. Augsburg: Naturbuch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Fischer
    • 1
  • Burkhard Beinlich
    • 1
  • Harald Plachter
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Biology, Institute for Nature ConservationUniversity of MarburgLahnberge, MarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations