Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 129–147 | Cite as

Ranking the Azorean Natural Forest Reserves for Conservation Using their Endemic Arthropods

  • P.A.V. Borges
  • A.R. Serrano
  • J.A. Quartau


Endemic arthropods were used to evaluate the conservation value of the 16 Natural Forest Reserves (NFRs) of the Azores (Macaronesia). For each of the 280 known Azorean endemic species of arthropods, a rarity index was calculated, using distribution and abundance data obtained from the literature. In addition, several scoring indices were used to rank the 16 NFRs. Frequency distributions of the rarity index indicated that there was a tendency for a greater proportion of the commonest species being represented in the NFRs in contrast with a lower representation of the rarest species. About 60% of the endemic arthropod species that were recorded from the NFRs are ‘single NFR endemics’, that is, are known from only one of the 16 NFRs. Species richness was considered to be a very good surrogate measure of the conservation value of the 16 NFRs under study. The fact that the six highest ranked NFRs (using a composite multi-criteria index) are located in different islands has some important conservation management implications; to preserve a large proportion of the Azorean arthropod biodiversity there is a need to protect sites in all islands. If the five highest ranked NFRs are correctly managed in terms of conservation, then at least 80% of the endemic arthropods known from the NFRs could be protected. Most of the tested taxa (Acari-Oribatei; Lepidoptera; Diptera; Coleoptera) are good surrogates of the overall total set of species present in the 16 NFRs when using a species richness index.

biodiversity rank forest reserves Azores Atlantic islands 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arita, H.T., Figueroa, F., Frisch, A., Rodríguez, P. and Santos-del-Prado, K. (1997) Geographical range size and the conservation of Mexican mammals. Conserv. Biol. 11, 92-100.Google Scholar
  2. Baz, A. (1989) On a small collection of Psocoptera from Madeira with a check-list of Psocoptera of the Portuguese Macaronesia. Bolm. Soc. Port. Ent. 4, 49-55.Google Scholar
  3. Bibby, C.L. (1998) Selecting areas for conservation. In Conservation Science and Action (W.J. Sutherland, ed), pp. 176-201. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  4. Borges, P.A.V. (1990) A checklist of Coleoptera from the Azores with some systematic and biogeographic comments. Bol. Mus. Mun. Funchal 42, 87-136.Google Scholar
  5. Borges, P.A.V. (1992) Biogeography of the Azorean Coleoptera. Bol. Mus. Mun. Funchal 44, 5-76.Google Scholar
  6. Borges, P.A.V. and Vieira, V. (1994) The Entomological Bibliography from the Azores. II-The Taxa. Bol. Mus. Mun. Funchal 46, 5-75.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, S.S. and Pearson, D.L. (1998) Spatial modeling of butterfly species richness using tiger beetles (Cicindelidae) as a bioindicator taxon. Ecol. Applications 8, 531-93.Google Scholar
  8. Ceballos, G., Rodríguez, P. and Medellín, R.A. (1998) Assessing conservation priorities in megadiverse Mexico: Mammalian diversity, endemicity, and endangerment. Ecol. Applications 8, 8-17.Google Scholar
  9. Collinson, N.H., Biggs, J., Corfield, A., Hodson, M.J., Walker, D., Whitfield, M. and Williams, P.J. (1995) Temporary and permanent ponds: An assessment of the effects of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Biol. Conserv. 74, 125-33.Google Scholar
  10. Crawley, M.J. (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Daniels, R.J.R., Hegde, M., Joshi, N.V. and Gadgil, M. (1991) Assigning conservation value: A case study from India. Conserv. Biol. 5, 464-75.Google Scholar
  12. Eason, E.H. and Ashmole, N.P. (1992) Indigenous centipedes (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha) from Azorean caves and lava flows. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 407-29.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, B.J., Taylor, J.E., Fox, M.D. and Williams, C. (1997) Vegetation changes across edges of rainforest remnants. Biol. Conserv. 82, 1-13.Google Scholar
  14. Freitag, S., Van Jaarsveld, A.S. and Biggs, H.C. (1997) Ranking priority biodiversity areas: An iterative conservation value-based approach. Biol. Conserv. 82, 263-72.Google Scholar
  15. Frey, R. (1945) Tiergeographische Studien uber die Dipterenfauna der Azoren. I. Verzeichnis der bisher von den Azoren bekannten Dipteren. Iter entomologicum et botanicum ad insulas Madeirum et Azores anno 1938 a Richard Frey, Ragnar Stora et Carl Cedercreutz factum. Soc. Scient. Fenn., Comm. Biol. 8, 1-114.Google Scholar
  16. Gama, M.M. (1992) Collemboles des Açores. IV. Algar 3, 41-8.Google Scholar
  17. Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Gaston, K.J. (1996) Spatial covariance in the species richness of higher taxa. In Aspects of the Genesis and Maintenance of Biological Diversity (M.E. Hochberg, J. Clobert and R. Barbault, eds), pp. 221-42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Geisthardt, M. (1996) Lista Vermelha para os Coleópteros (Insecta, Coleoptera). Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 193, 89-120.Google Scholar
  20. Goerck, J.M. (1997) Patterns of rarity in the birds of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Conserv. Biol. 11, 112-8.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, A. (1988) Check-List, Azores (vascular plants). Unpublished.Google Scholar
  22. Howarth, F.G. and Ramsay, G.W. (1991) The conservation of island insects and their habitats. In The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats (N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds) pp. 71-107. London: Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 15.Google Scholar
  23. Howard, P., Davenport, T. and Kigenyi, F. (1997) Planning conservation areas in Uganda's natural forests. Oryx 31, 253-64.Google Scholar
  24. Kattan, G.H. (1992) Rarity and vulnerability: The birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Conserv. Biol. 6, 64-70.Google Scholar
  25. Kerr, J.T. (1997) Species richness, endemism, and the choice of areas for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11, 1094-100.Google Scholar
  26. Kirchhofer, A. (1997) The assessment of fish vulnerability in Switzerland based on distribution data. Biol. Conserv. 80, 1-8.Google Scholar
  27. Lecoq, M. (1996) Primeira ListaVermelha para os Acrídeos (Insecta, Saltatoria). Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 193, 87-8.Google Scholar
  28. McIntyre, S. (1992) Risks associated with the setting of conservation priorities from rare plant species lists. Biol. Conserv. 60, 31-7.Google Scholar
  29. Meyer,M. (1995) The Lepidoptera of the Macaronesian Region. IV: Threatened endemic Macrolepidoptera in northern Macaronesia (Madeira, Azores). Proceedings of the EIS Colloquium, pp. 72-7.Google Scholar
  30. Panzer, R. and Schwartz, M.W. (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetationbased approach to insect conservation. Conserv. Biol. 12, 693-702.Google Scholar
  31. Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335-7.Google Scholar
  32. Samways, M.J. (1993) Insects in biodiversity conservation, some perspectives and directives. Biodivers. Conserv. 2, 258-82.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, G. and Geisthardt, M. (1996) Lista Vermelha para os Aracnídeos (Arachnida, Araneida). Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 193, 77-85.Google Scholar
  34. Sousa, A.B. and Sakai, S. (1997) Dermápteros (Insecta, Dermaptera) da Macaronésia, Faunística e Zoogeografia. Bolm. Soc. Port. Ent. 6, 289-306.Google Scholar
  35. Spellerberg, I.F. (1992) Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Troumbis, A.Y. and Dimitrakopoulos, P.G. (1998) Geographic coincidence of diversity threatspots for three taxa and conservation planning in Greece. Biol. Conserv. 84, 1-6.Google Scholar
  37. Turpie, J.K. (1995) Prioritizing South African estuaries for conservation: A practical example using waterbirds. Biol. Conserv. 74, 175-85.Google Scholar
  38. Vieira, V. (1998) Biogeografia dos Lepidópteros (Insecta, Lepidoptera) dos Ac¸ores. Revista Biol. 16, 87-106.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, P.H. (1998) Key sites for conservation, area-selection methods for biodiversity. In Conservation in a Changing World, Conservation-forest reserves-Azores 145 Integrating Processes into Priorities for Action (G.M. Mace, A. Balmford and J.R. Ginsberg, eds), pp. 211-249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • P.A.V. Borges
    • 1
  • A.R. Serrano
    • 2
  • J.A. Quartau
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciências AgráriasUniversidade dos Açores, Terra-ChãAçoresPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia, Faculdade de Ciências de LisboaCentro de Biologia AmbientalLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations