Adapting to the Changing Environment: A Theoretical Comparison of Decision Making Proficiency of Lean and Mass Organization Systems

  • Zhiang Lin
  • Chun Hui


In this paper weexamine the adaptability of the Japanese style leanorganization system and the traditional American style mass organizationsystem under changing environments. From an organizational designperspective, key structural aspects of the two organizations are modeled ina problem solving context using computational methods. Organizational-levelperformance in terms of decision making accuracy and severity of errors ismeasured as an indicator of organizational adaptability under conditionswhere the task environment shifts between predictable to unpredictable orvise versa. Our study shows that both organizations have their respectiveadvantages under different task environments and that they adapt toenvironmental shifts in different forms. Specifically, when the timepressure is high the lean organization system's performance isvirtually identical to the mass organization system, even though the leanorganization systemÆs members are more proactive. When the timepressure is low, the mass organization system shows a much fasteradaptability when the environment shifts to a predictable one but it is alsomore vulnerable when the environment shifts to an unpredictable one. Incontrast, the lean organization systemÆs response to the changingenvironment is characterized by its slower adaptability. When theenvironment shifts to an unpredictable one, the lean organization systemshows a gradual improvement till reaching a high level. When the environmentshifts to a predictable one, however, the lean organization system shows agradual decrease of performance. Our study further shows that the leanorganization system, with its strong team decision making emphasis, can bemore successful in avoiding severe errors when compared with the massorganization system, even under a predictable task environment.

organizational design environmental change computer simulation adaptation organizational learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, N.R., H.W. Lane, H. Nagai and H. Takagi (1993), "A Comparison of Canadian and Japanese Cognitive Styles: Implications for Management Interaction," Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), 575–587.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H.E. (1979), Organizations and Environment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Baligh, H.H., R.M. Burton and B. Obel (1996), "Organizational Consultant: Creating a Useable Theory for Organizational Design," Management Science, 42(12), 1648–1662.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B.M. and P.C. Burger (1979), Assessment of Managers: An International Comparison. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berggren, C. (1992), Alternatives to Lean Production. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blumberg, R.L. (1987), Organizations in Contemporary Society, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Bourgeous, L.J., III. and K.M. Eisenhardt (1988), "Strategic Decision Processes in the High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry," Management Science, 34(7), 816–835.Google Scholar
  8. Burns, T. and G.M. Stalker (1961), The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Carley, K.M. and M.J. Prietula (1994), Computational Organization Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Courtright, J.A., G.T. Fairhurst and L.E. Rogers (1989), "Interaction Patterns in Organic and Mechanistic Systems," Academy of Management of Journal, 773–802.Google Scholar
  12. Cusumano, M.A. (1988), "Manufacturing Innovation: Lessons from the Japanese Auto Industry," Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  13. Daft, R.L. (1982), "Bureaucratic Versus Non-bureaucratic Structure and the Process of Innovation and Change," in S.B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 1, pp. 129–166.Google Scholar
  14. Daft, R.L. and K.E. Weick (1984), "Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems," Academy of Management Review, 9, 284–295.Google Scholar
  15. Daniel, S.J. and W.D. Reitsperger (1991), "Management Control Systems for J.I.T.: An Empirical Comparison of Japan and the U.S.," International Journal of Business Studies, 22(4), 603–617.Google Scholar
  16. Davy, J.A., R.E. White, N.J. Merritt and K. Gritzmacher (1992), "A Derivation of the Underlying Constructs of Just-In-Time Production Systems," Academy of Management Journal, 35, 653–670.Google Scholar
  17. De Geus, A.P. (1988), "Planning as Learning," Harvard Business Review, 66(2), 70–74.Google Scholar
  18. Drucker, P.F. (1987), "Workers' Hands Bound by Tradition," Wall Street Journal, 18.Google Scholar
  19. Epple, D., L. Argote and R. Devadas (1991), "Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing," Organization Science, 2(1), 59–87.Google Scholar
  20. Feigenbaum, A.V. (1991), Total Quality Control. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Fiol, C.M. and M.A. Lyles (1985), "Organizational Learning," Academy of Management Review, 10, 803-813.Google Scholar
  21. Gupta, A.K. and D.L. Wilemon (1990), "Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products," California Management Review, 24–44.Google Scholar
  22. Haire, M., E.E. Ghiselli and L.W. Porter (1966), Managerial Thinking: An International Study. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1977), The Population Ecology of Organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.Google Scholar
  24. Hogg, T.M. (1993), "Lean Manufacturing," Human Systems Management, 12(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
  25. Hollenbeck, J.R., D.R. Ilgen, D.J. Sego, J. Hedlund, D.A. Major and J. Phillips (1995), "Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise," Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292–316.Google Scholar
  26. Houskisson, R.E. and C.S. Galbraith (1985), "The Effect of Quantum Versus Incremental M-form Reorganization on Performance: A Time Series Exploration of Intervention Dynamics," Journal of Management, 11, 55–70.Google Scholar
  27. Huber, G.P. (1991), "Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures," Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.Google Scholar
  28. Hutchins, E. (1991), "Organizing Work by Adaptation," Organization Science, 2(1), 15–39. Imai, M. (1986), Kaizen: The Key to Japans' Competitive Success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Jin, Y., R.E. Levitt, J.C. Kunz and T.R. Christiansen (1995), "The Virtual Design Team: A Computer Simulation Framework for Studying Organizational Aspects of Concurrent Design," Simulation, 64(3), 160–174.Google Scholar
  30. Jin, Y., R.E. Levitt, T.R. Christiansen and J.C. Kunz (1996), "The Virtual Design Team: A Computer Model of Project," Computational and mathematical Organization Theory, 2(3), 171–196.Google Scholar
  31. Koberg, C.S. (1987), "Resource Scarcity, Environmental Uncertainty and Adaptive Organizational Behavior," Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 798–807.Google Scholar
  32. Krafcik, J.F. (1988), "Triumph of the Lean Production System," Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41–52.Google Scholar
  33. Lant, T.K. and S.J. Mezias (1992), "An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation," Organization Science, 3(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
  34. Lant, T.K., F.J. Milliken and B. Batra (1992), "The Roles of Managerial Learning and Interpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration," Strategic Management Journal, 13, 585–608.Google Scholar
  35. Levitt, B. and J. March (1996), "Organizational Learning," in M.D. Cohen and L.S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational Learning, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 516–540.Google Scholar
  36. Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (1995), "DYCORP: A Computational Framework for Examining Organizational Performance under Dynamic Conditions," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20(2-3), 193–217.Google Scholar
  37. Lin, Z. and K.M. Carley (1997), "Organizational Response: The Cost Performance Tradeoff," Management Science, 43(2), 217–234Google Scholar
  38. Lorriman, J. and T. Kenjo (1994), Japan's Winning Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lounamaa, P.H. and J.G. March (1987), "Adaptive Coordination of a Learning Team," Management Science, 33(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  40. Lysonski, S., A. Singer and D. Wilemon (1989), "Coping with Environmental Uncertainty and Bounded Spanning in the Product Manager's Role," The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 33–43.Google Scholar
  41. Maguire, M.A. and R.T. Pascale (1978), "Communication, Decision-Making and Implementation among Managers in Japanese and American Managed Companies in the United States," Sociology and Social Research, 63, 1–23.Google Scholar
  42. March, J.G. (1991), "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  43. Milliken, F.J. (1990), "Perceiving and Interpreting Environmental Change: An Examination of College Administrators' Interpretation of Changing Demographics," Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 42–63.Google Scholar
  44. Orasanu, J. and E. Salas (1992), "Team Decision Making in Complex Environments," in G. Klein, J. Orasanu and R. Calderwood (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods.Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  45. Parsons, T. (1956), "Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 63–85.Google Scholar
  46. Pascale, R.T. (1978), "Communication and Decision-Making across Cultures-Japanese and American Comparisons," Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 91–110.Google Scholar
  47. Porter, M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Pugh, D.S., D.T. Hickson, C.R. Hinings, K.M. MacDonald, C. Turner and T. Lupton (1963), "A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis," Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 289–315.Google Scholar
  49. Rehder, R.R. (1992), "Building Cars as if People Mattered: The Japanese Lean System vs. Volvo's Uddevalla System," Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(2), 56–70.Google Scholar
  50. Reitsperger, W.D. and S.J. Daniel (1990), "Japan vs. Silicon Valley: Quality-Cost Trade-Off Philosophies," International Journal of Business Studies, 21(2), 289–300.Google Scholar
  51. Sammon, W.L., M.A. Kurland and R. Spitalnic (1984), Business Competitor Intelligence: Methods for Collecting, Organizing, and Using Information. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Schoonhoven, C.B. (1981), "Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden in the Language of Contingency Theory," Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349–377.Google Scholar
  53. Scott, W.R. (1987), Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, H.A. (1991), "Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning," Organization Science, 2(1), 125–139.Google Scholar
  55. Takamiya, S. (1969), "Characteristics of Japanese Management and Its Recent Tendencies: Effectiveness of Japanese Management," The Role of Management: Innovation, Integration, Internationalization: Proceedings of the 15th CIOS International Management Congress, 394–405.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, J.D. (1967), Organizations in Action.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Wakabayashi, M. and G. Graen (1991), "Cross-Cultural Human Resource Development: Japanese Manufacturing Firms in Central Japan and Central United States," in M. Trevor (Ed.), International Business and the Management of Change, Brookfield, VT: Avebury, pp. 147–169.Google Scholar
  58. Walton, R. and G. Susman (1987), "People Policies for the New Machines," Harvard Business Review, 68, 98–106.Google Scholar
  59. Weick, K.E. (1987), "Organizational Culture and High Reliability," California Management Review, 29(2), 112–127.Google Scholar
  60. Wick, C.W. (1995), "From Ideas to Action: Creating a Learning Organization," Human Resource Management, 34(2), 299–311.Google Scholar
  61. Womack, J.P., D.T. Jones and D. Roos (1990), The Machine that Changed the World: Based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-Million Dollar 5-Year Study on the Future of the Automobile. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
  62. Woodward, J. (1958). Management and Technology. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  63. Zetka, J.R., Jr. (1992), "Mass-Production Automation and Work-Group Solidarity in the Post-World War II Automobile Industry," Work and Occupations, 19(3), 255–271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiang Lin
    • 1
  • Chun Hui
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management of Organizations, School of Business and ManagementThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations