Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 12, Issue 2–3, pp 129–144 | Cite as

Towards A New Authoring Methodology for Large-Scale Hypermedia Applications

  • Ian Heath
  • Gary Wills
  • Richard Crowder
  • Wendy Hall
  • Jim Ballantyne

Abstract

As the amount of information technology increases, managing information resources, so that the correct people can find the information easily, becomes a critical issue. Hypermedia systems are considered one solution to this problem as they provide a means for representing higher level relationships between the underlying information. However, the amount of information available electronically is increasing at an accelerated rate. Using standard hypermedia authoring techniques, the effort required managing and maintaining large-scale hypermedia systems is enormous. Hypermedia authoring in the large requires new methodologies if it is going to be feasible.

This paper presents a new model for building and structuring large-scale hypermedia applications. It describes a case study that explored the delivery of hypermedia information in an industrial environment on a small scale. Models and techniques developed for that case study were then refined and augmented so they could support the construction of large-scale hypermedia systems. In order to support such endeavors a new linking model is presented that allows the author to explicitly represent abstract concepts contained within the underlying information and interconnect them in some meaningful manner. A prototype system applying this linking technique is presented.

industrial strength hypermedia generic links link clusters authoring methodology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Aichison and A. Gilchrist, “Thesaurus construction-A practical manual,” The Association for Information Management, London EC3A 7PB, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.D. Beitner, “Microcosm++: Development of a loosely coupled object-based architecture for open hypermedia systems,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Borgida, “Description logics in data management,” IEEE Trans Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 671–782, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.M. Crowder, W. Hall, I. Heath, R. Bernard, and D. Gaskell, “A hypermedia maintenance information system,” IEE Computing and Control Engineering Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 121–128, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.M. Crowder, W. Hall, I. Heath, and R. Bernard, “ITE-Multimedia information systems as an operational interface within the advanced manufacturing environment,” Final Report. SERC Grant: GR/H 43038 University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.M. Crowder and W. Hall, “Industrial Information Resource Management,” in Proc. Integration in Manufacturing, Galway, Ireland, 2–4 October 1996, pp. 206–214.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.M. Crowder, G.B. Wills, I. Heath, and W. Hall, “The application of hypermedia in the factory information environment,” in Proc. IEE 5th International Conference on FACTORY 2000, Cambridge, UK, 2–4 April 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Cunliffe, C. Taylor, and D. Tudhope, “Query-based navigation in semantically linked hypermedia,” in Proc. Hypertext'97, Southampton, 1997, pp. 87–95.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.C. Davis, W. Hall, I. Heath, G.J. Hill, and R.J. Wilkins, “Towards an integrated information environment with open hypermedia systems,” in Proc. ECHT'92, Milan, Italy, 1992, pp. 181–190.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.J. DeRose and D.G. Durand, Making Hypermedia Work, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, 1994Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.M. Fountain, W. Hall, I. Heath, and G. Hill, “MICROCOSM: An open model for hypermedia with dynamic linking,” in Proc. European Conference on Hypertext, INRIA, France, pp. 298–311.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Garzotto, L. Mainetti, and P. Paolini, “Information reuse in hypermedia applications,” in Proc. Hypertext'96, Washington DC, 1996, pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Goble, S. Haul, and S. Bechhofer, “Describing and classifying multimedia using the description logic GRAIL,” in Proc. SPIE Conference on Storage and Retrieval of Still Image and Video IV, San Jose, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Furuta and P.D. Stotts, “Programmable browsing semantics in trellis,” in Proc. Hypertext'89 Pittsburgh, 1989, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.F. Goldfarb, The SGML Handbook, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L.H. Hsu, P. Liu, and T. Dawidowsky, “A Multimedia Authoring-in-the-Large Environment to Support Complex Product Documentation,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 11–64, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P.H. Lewis, M.R. Dobie, and W. Hall, “Towards multimedia thesaurus support for media-based navigation,” in Proc. IDB-MMS'96, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 83–90.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K.C. Malcolm, S.E. Poltrock, and D. Schuler, “Industrial strength hypermedia: requirements for a large engineering enterprise,” in Proc. Hypertext'91, San Antonio, 1991, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C.C. Marshall, “Two years before the mist: Experiences with aquanet,” in Proc. Hypertext'92, Milan, 1992, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.C. Marshall, F.G. Halasz, R.A. Rogers, and W.C. Janssen, “Aquanet: A hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place,” in Proc. Hypertext'91, San Antonio, 1991, pp. 261–275.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.C. Marshall, F.M. Shipman III, and J.H. Coombs, “VIKI: Spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure,” in Proc. ECHT94, Edinburgh, 1994, pp.13–23.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Maurer, HyperG, and HM-Card. HyperG now Hyperwave, Addison Wesley: New York 1996, Chap. 27.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Weiss, B. Vélez, M.A. Sheldon, and C. Manprempre, “HyPursuit: A hierarchical network search engine”Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Heath
    • 1
  • Gary Wills
    • 2
  • Richard Crowder
    • 3
  • Wendy Hall
    • 4
  • Jim Ballantyne
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  4. 4.Department of Electronics and Computer ScienceUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  5. 5.Post Office Research GroupConcept 2000FarnboroughUK

Personalised recommendations