Advertisement

Assessing the Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The Case of Revere, MA., USA

  • George E. Clark
  • Susanne C. Moser
  • Samuel J. Ratick
  • Kirstin Dow
  • William B. Meyer
  • Srinivas Emani
  • Weigen Jin
  • Jeanne X. Kasperson
  • Roger E. Kasperson
  • Harry E. Schwarz
Article

Abstract

Climate change may affect the frequency, intensity, and geographic distribution of severe coastal storms. Concurrent sea-level rise would raise the baseline of flooding during such events. Meanwhile, social vulnerability factors such as poverty and disability hinder the ability to cope with storms and storm damage. While physical changes are likely to remain scientifically uncertain into the foreseeable future, the ability to mitigate potential impacts from coastal flooding may be fostered by better understanding the interplay of social and physical factors that produce human vulnerability. This study does so by integrating the classic causal model of hazards with social, environmental, and spatial dynamics that lead to the differential ability of people to cope with hazards. It uses Census data, factor analysis, data envelopment analysis, and floodplain maps to understand the compound social and physical vulnerability of coastal residents in the city of Revere, MA, USA.

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis Causal Model Block Group Social Vulnerability Global Environmental Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bijlsma, L. et al.: 1996, Coastal zones and small islands. In: Watson, Robert T. et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 299-324. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blaikie, P.: 1985, The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B.: 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E. and Watts, M. J.: 1994, Climate change and social vulnerability: towards a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change 4: 37-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolin, R.: 1982, Long-Term Family Recovery from Disaster. Monograph # 36. Boulder, CO.: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  6. Bolin, R. and Bolton, P.: 1986, Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery. Program on Environment and Behavior Monograph # 42. Boulder, CO.: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  7. Bolin, R. and Klenow, D.: 1983, Response of the elderly to disaster: an age-stratified analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 16: 283-296.Google Scholar
  8. Bolin, R. and Stanford, L.: 1991, Shelter, housing, and recovery: A comparison of U.S. disasters. Disasters 15: 24-34.Google Scholar
  9. Bruce, J. P., Lee, H. and Haites, E. F., (eds.): 1996, Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contributions of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cash, D.: 1997, Local response to global change: Creating effective bridges between science, policy and action. Paper prepared for the workshop on Regional Climate Change Impacts on Great Plains Ecosystems, May 27-29, 1997, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E.: 1979, Measuring the efficiency for decisionmaking units. European Journal of Operational Research 2.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, R. S.: 1994, The human dimensions of vulnerability. In R. H. Socolow, C. Andrews, F. Berkhout, and V. Thomas (eds.), Industrial Ecology and Global Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85-105.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, W. C., Jager, J. and van Eijndhoven, J. (eds.): Forthcoming. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Corps of Engineers: 1979, A Report on the Assessment of Flood Damages Resulting from the Storm of 6-7 February 1978 along the Coastline from Orleans, Massachusetts to New Castle, New Hampshire. February. Waltham, MA.: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division.Google Scholar
  15. Cutter, S. L.: 1996, Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20: 529-539.Google Scholar
  16. Dow, K.: 1992, Exploring differences in our common future(s): The meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum 23: 417-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dow, K.: 1993, Unpublished literature review on the 'concept of vulnerability' and the 'factors contributing to vulnerability'. Worcester: George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University.Google Scholar
  18. Dow, K. and Downing, T. E.: 1995, Vulnerability research: where things stand. Human Dimensions Quarterly 1: 3-5.Google Scholar
  19. Drabek, T. E., and Key, W. H.: 1984, Conquering Disaster: Family Recovery and Long-Term Consequences. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  20. Global Environmental Assessment Project: 1997, A Critical Evaluation of Global Environmental Assessments: the Climate Experience. Calverton, MD: CARE.Google Scholar
  21. Godschalk, D. R., Brower, D. J. and Beatley, T.: 1989, Catastrophic Coastal Storms. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Haas, J. E., Kates, R. W. and Bowden, M. J.: 1977, Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haynes, K., Ratick, S., Bowen, W. and Cummings-Saxton, J.: 1993, Environmental decision models: U.S. experiences and new approaches to pollution management. Environment International 19: 200-220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hewitt, K., (ed.): 1983, Interpretations of Calamity. Boston: Allen & Unwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Hewitt, K.: 1997, Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Hewitt, K., and Burton, I.: 1971, The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events.Department of Geography Research Publications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hohenemser, C., Kasperson, R. E. and Kates, R. W.: 1985, Causal structure. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, and J. X. Kasperson (ed.), Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, 43-66. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hunt, R.: 1990, Saugus River and Tributaries Flood Damage Reduction Study, Lynn, Malden, Revere, and Saugus, Massachusetts. April. Waltham, MA.: U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division.Google Scholar
  29. Kotlyakov, V. M. et al.: 1988, Global change: Geographical approaches (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85 (August): 5986-5991.Google Scholar
  30. Liverman, D. M.: 1990, Vulnerability to global environmental change. In R. E. Kasperson, K. Dow, D. Golding, and J. X. Kasperson (eds.), Understanding Global Environmental Change: The Contributions of Risk Analysis and Management. Worcester, MA.: Earth Transformed Program, Clark University.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, J. K.: 1984, Hazard perception studies: Convergent concerns and divergent approaches during the past decade. In T. F. Saarinen, D. Seamon, and J. L. Sell, eds., Environmental Perception and Behavior: An Inventory and Prospect, 33-59. Research Paper No. 209. Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Moser, S. C.: 1997, Mapping the Territory of Uncertainty and Ignorance: Broadening Current Assessment and Policy Approaches to Sea-Level Rise. Dissertation. Worcester, MA: Clark University.Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell, J. K.: 1984, Hazard perception studies: Convergent concerns and divergent approaches during the past decade. In T. F. Saarinen, D. Seamon, and J. L. Sell (ed.), Environmental Perception and Behavior: An Inventory and Prospect, 33-59. Research Paper No. 209. Chicago: Department of Geography, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Nealon, P. and Brelis, B.: 1996, The eastcoaster of' 96: N. E. digs out; forecasters say to dig in for more. The Boston Globe(January 9):1,21.Google Scholar
  35. NRC (National Research Council): 1984, Hurricane Diana, North Carolina, September 10-14, 1984. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  36. Parr, A. R.: 1987, Disasters and disabled persons: An examination of the safety needs of a neglected minority. Disasters 11: 148-159.Google Scholar
  37. Perry, R. W., Greene, M. and Mushkatel, A.: 1983, American Minority Citizens in Disaster. Seattle: Battelle.Google Scholar
  38. Perry, R. W. and Lindell, M. K.: 1991, The effects of ethnicity on evacuation decisionmaking. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9: 47-68.Google Scholar
  39. Platt, R.: 1991, Lifelines: An emergency management priority for the United States in the 1990's. Disasters 15: 172-176.Google Scholar
  40. Quarantelli, E. L.: 1991, Patterns of Sheltering and Housing in American Disasters. Preliminary Paper #170. Newark, DE.: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center.Google Scholar
  41. Renn, O.: 1992, Concepts of Risk: A Classification. In S. Krimsky, and D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT.: Praeger, 53-79.Google Scholar
  42. Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., Weber-Burdin, E. and Pereira, J.: 1983, Victims of the Environment: Loss From Natural Hazards in the United States, 1970-1980. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  43. Susman, P., O'Keefe, P. and Wisner, B.: 1983, Global disasters: a radical interpretation. In K. Hewitt (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity. Boston: Allen & Unwin, Inc., 263-283.Google Scholar
  44. Timmerman, P.: 1981, Vulnerability, Resilience, and the Collapse of Society. Toronto: Institute for Environmental Studies. Environmental Monograph 1.Google Scholar
  45. Timms, D. W. G.: 1971, The Urban Mosaic: Towards a Theory of Residential Differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Trainer, P. and Bolin, R.: 1976, Persistent effects of disasters on daily activities: a cross-cultural comparison. Mass Emergencies 1: 279-290.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Meyer, W. B., Dow, K. M., Golding, D., Kasperson, J. X., Mitchell, R. C. and Ratick, S. J.: 1990, Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatialscale issues in their human dimensions. Global Environmental Change 1: 14-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vigue, D. I.: 1997, Some don't Revere the name. Boston Globe (March 23), B1, B5.Google Scholar
  49. Warrick, R. A., Le Provost, C., Meier, M. F., Oerlemans, J. and Woodworth, P. L.: 1996, Changes in sea level. In J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, eds. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Watson, R. T. et al. (eds.): 1996, Climate change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Watts, M.: 1983, On the poverty of theory: natural hazards research in context. In Hewitt, K., ed., Interpretations of Calamity. Boston: Allen & Unwin, Inc., 231-262.Google Scholar
  52. Watts, M. J., and Bohle, H. G.: 1993, The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography17: 43-67.Google Scholar
  53. Wescoat, J. L., Jr.: 1987, The 'practical range of choice' in water resources geography. Progress in Human Geography11: 41-59.Google Scholar
  54. Wescoat, J. L., Jr.: 1993, Resource management: UNCED, GATT, and global change. Progress in Human Geography17: 232-240.Google Scholar
  55. White, G. F. 1961. The choice of use in resources management. Natural Resources Journal1 (March): 23-40.Google Scholar
  56. White, G. F., and Haas, J. E.: 1975, An Assessment of Research Needs on Natural Hazards. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wisner, B.: 1992, Disaster vulnerability. In H.-G. Bohle, ed., Worlds of Pain and Hunger: Geographical Perspectives on Disaster Vulnerability and Food Security, 13-52. Saarbrucken: Verlag Breitenbach.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • George E. Clark
    • 1
  • Susanne C. Moser
    • 2
  • Samuel J. Ratick
    • 1
  • Kirstin Dow
    • 3
  • William B. Meyer
    • 1
  • Srinivas Emani
    • 1
  • Weigen Jin
    • 4
  • Jeanne X. Kasperson
    • 5
  • Roger E. Kasperson
    • 1
  • Harry E. Schwarz
    • 6
  1. 1.Graduate School of Geography and George Perkins Marsh InstituteClark UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Belfer Ctr. for Science & Internatl. Affairs, Kennedy SchoolHarvard UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Geography DepartmentUniversity of South CarolinaUSA
  4. 4.Data Inc.Englewood Cliffs
  5. 5.George Perkins Marsh InstituteClark UniversityUSA
  6. 6.International Development ProgramClark UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations