Problems with the DSM-IV Diagnosis of Pedophilia

  • William O'Donohue
  • Lisa G. Regev
  • Anne Hagstrom
Article
  • 412 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the taxonomic adequacy of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th ed., DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnostic category of pedophilia. This diagnosis, as well as the other sexual disorders, have been ignored in DSM field trials. There is no empirical information about the reliability or validity of this diagnosis. Moreover, because the vagueness of the diagnostic criteria, clinicians would need to make inferences that would likely lead to reliability problems in diagnosis. Further, the DSM diagnostic criteria include constructs that are not intersubjectively verifiable and for which there are no valid measures. This can also lead to lack of diagnostic reliability and accuracy. Most problematical however, there are aspects of the diagnostic criteria, most notably the presence of an “ego dystonic sexual attraction to children,” that are incorrect exclusion criteria. Suggestions for improvement are provided.

pedophilia sexual interest DSM-IV behavioral disorder 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (1996). DSM-IV Sourcebook (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (1997). DSM-IV Sourcebook (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  6. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rather, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes on non-incarcerated paraphiliacs.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25.Google Scholar
  7. DeYoung, M. (1988). The indignant page: Techniques of neutralization in the publications of pedophile organizations.Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 583–591.Google Scholar
  8. Dohrenwend, B. P., & Dohrenwend, B. S. (1965). The problem of validity in field studies of psychological disorder.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70, 52–69.Google Scholar
  9. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Fundamentals of taxonomy.Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science.New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marshall (1997). Pedophilia: Psychopathology and theory.In D. Laws and W. O'Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance (pp. 152–174). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1991). DSM-IV: Empirical guidelines from psychometrics.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 308–315.Google Scholar
  12. O'Donohue, W. T., & Geer, J. H. (1993). Research issues in the sexual dysfunctions.In W. O'Donohue & J. Geer (Eds.), Handbook of sexual dysfunctions (pp. 1–14). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. O'Donohue, W., & Letourneau, E. (1992). The psychometric properties of the penile tumescence assessment of child molesters.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14, 123–174.Google Scholar
  14. O'Donohue, W., & Letourneau, E. (1993). A brief group treatment for the modification of denial in child sexual abusers: Outcome and follow up.Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 299–304.Google Scholar
  15. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J., Gibbon, M., & First, M. (1989). Structured clinical interview for the DSM-III-R.New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Wakefield, J. C. (1992a). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder.Psychological Review, 99, 232–247.Google Scholar
  17. Wakefield, J. C. (1992b). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values.American Psychologist, 47, 373–388.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • William O'Donohue
    • 1
  • Lisa G. Regev
    • 1
  • Anne Hagstrom
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NevadaReno
  2. 2.Northern Illinois UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations