Depression in a Cancer Patient Population

  • Lee M. Ritterband
  • Charles D. Spielberger

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to examine depression and its components in cancer patients as compared with healthy control subjects and psychiatric inpatients. The participants were 54 cancer patients (28 females with breast cancer, 26 males with prostate cancer), 59 healthy controls (33 females, 26 males), and 75 psychiatric patients (27 females, 48 males). Participants were administered the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State Trait Personality Inventory (STPI) Depression scales. Cancer patients had higher overall depression scores than did healthy controls as measured by BDI, but the difference was due primarily to the significantly higher scores of the cancer patients on the BDI Somatic–Performance subscale. No differences were found on the BDI Cognitive–Affective subscale. Cancer patients also scored significantly higher than healthy controls on the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI) State Depression (S-Dep) scale because of higher Euthymia subscale scores. The psychiatric inpatients scored significantly higher than the other groups on all measures of depression. The findings of this study suggest that cancer patients may be erroneously labeled as depressed because of somatic–performance difficulties they may experience, which are similar to symptoms of depressed individuals. In addition, it is essential to delineate the various components of depression in evaluating cancer patients.

depression cancer BDI STPI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Cancer Society (ACS). (1998). Cancer facts & figures–1998. Atlanta, GA: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R.A. (1987). Beck depression inventory: Manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson M., Mock J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
  4. Berndt, D. J. (1990). Inventories and scales. In B. B. Wolman, & G. Stricker (Eds.), Depressive disorders (pp. 255–274). NewYork: JohnWiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Greer, S., & Morris, T. (1975). Psychological attributes of women who develop breast cancer: A controlled study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 19, 147–153.Google Scholar
  6. Gotlib, I. H., & Cane, D. B. (1989) Self–report assessment of depression and anxiety. In P. C. Kendall & D. Watson (Eds.), Anxiety and depression (pp. 131–169). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Plumb, M. M., & Holland, J. (1977). Comparative studies of psychological function in patients with advanced cancer—I. Self reported depressive symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 39(4), 264–276.Google Scholar
  8. Rabkin, J. G., & Klein, D. F. (1987). The clinical measurement of depressive disorders. In A. J. Marsella, R. M. A. Hirschfeld, & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The measurement of depression (pp. 30–86). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Reich, J. H., & Noyes, R. (1987). A comparison of DSM–III personality disorders in acutely ill panic and depressed patients. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 1(2), 123–131.Google Scholar
  10. Ritterband, L. M. (1995). Evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory's sensitivity and state–trait properties. Unpublished master's thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  11. Ritterband, L.M.(1998). Evaluation of depression, emotional states, and personality traits in cancer patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  12. Ritterband, L. M., & Spielberger, C.D. (1996). Construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory as a measure of state and trait depression in non–clinical populations. Depression and Stress, 2(2), 123–145.Google Scholar
  13. Roberts, C. S., Baile, W. B., Elkins, N. W., & Cox, C. E. (1990). Effects of interview context on the assessment of mood in breast cancer patients: A replication study. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 8, 33–47.Google Scholar
  14. Spielberger, C. D., Barker, L. R., Russell, S. F., Crane, R. S., Westberry, L. G., Knight, J., & Marks, E. (1979). The preliminary manual for the State–Trait Personality Inventory. Unpublished manual, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  15. Spijker, A. V., Trijsburg, R. W., & Duivenvoorden, H. J. (1997). Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: A meta–analytic review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 280–293.Google Scholar
  16. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–III–R (SCID): I. History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(8), 624–629.Google Scholar
  17. Stevens, D. E., Merikangas, K. R., & Merikangas, J. R. (1995). Comorbidity of depression and other medical conditions. In E. E. Beckham & W. R. Leber (Eds.), Handbook of depression: 2nd ed., pp. 147–199). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Temoshok, L., & Heller, B. W. (1984). On comparing apples, oranges, and fruit salad: A methodological overview of medical outcome studies in psychosocial oncology. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Psychosocial Stress and Cancer (pp. 231–260).Google Scholar
  19. Wolman, B. B., & Stricker, G. (Eds.). (1990). Depressive disorders: Facts, theories, and treatment methods. New York: Wiley–Interscience.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee M. Ritterband
    • 1
  • Charles D. Spielberger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatric MedicineUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesville
  2. 2.Center for Research in Behavioral Medicine and Health PsychologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaFlorida

Personalised recommendations