Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to show how latent variable growth modeling can be utilized to examine change in students' attitudes toward science over the middle and high school years using data from the Longitudinal Study of American Youth (Miller, Hoffer, Suchner, Brown, & Nelson, 1992).The results of the present study show that students' attitudes toward science generally decline over the middle and high school years. Science self-concept was found to be the strongest predictor of attitudes toward science. Teacher encouragement of science and peer attitudes are also significant predictors of students' attitudes. The effect of the parent variable was found to be quite small and statistically nonsignificant, with the exception of the seventh grade. Boys were found to have higher initial status on attitudes toward science and their attitudes dropped faster than girls. Also it was found that students in metropolitan and rural schools have less positive attitudes toward science in the seventh grade compared to students in suburban schools. Latent variable growth modeling allows one to examine change in attitudes and also examine the effects of time-varying and time-invariant predictors. Substantive and methodological implications of this technique are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Atkinson, J. W., and Birch, D. (1978). An Introduction to Motivation, Van Nostrand, New York.
Atwater, M. M., Wiggins, J., and Gardner, C. M. (1995). A study of urban middle school students with high and low attitudes toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 665–677.
Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., and Kelly, D. L. (1996). Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Center for the Study of Testing
Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.
Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin 101: 147–158.
Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Cannon, K. C., and Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships among attitude, motivation, and achievement of ability grouped, seventh-grade, life science students. Science Education 69: 121–138.
Curran, P. J., Harford, T. C., and Muthén, B. O. (1996). The relation between heavy alcohol use and bar patronage: A latent growth model. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 57: 410–418.
Druva, C. A., and Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome:Ametaanalysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 467–479.
Ebenezer, J. V., and Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students' perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 175–186.
Evans, M. A., Whigham, M., and Wang, M. C. (1995). The effect of a role model project upon the attitudes of ninth grade science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 195–204.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies in Science Education 2: 1–41.
George, R., and Kaplan, D. (1995, April). An application of structural equation modeling to science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS:88. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
George, R., and Kaplan, D. (1996, April). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on the science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS:88. In Goldring, E. (Chair), The role of parental involvement in educational attitudes, aspirations, and achievement: Results from national and international studies. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
George, R., and Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS:88. Science Education 82: 93–109.
Haladyna, T., and Shaughnessy, J. (1982a). Attitudes toward science: Aquantitative synthesis. Science Education 66: 547–563.
Haladyna, T., and Shaughnessy, J. (1982b). A Manual for the Inventory of Affective Aspects of Schooling, Teaching Research, Monmouth, OR.
Haladyna, T., Olsen, R., and Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Relations of student, teacher, and learning environment variables to attitudes toward science. Science Education 66: 671–687.
Haladyna, T., Olsen, R., and Shaughnessy, J. (1983). Correlates of class attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20: 311–324.
Hasan, O. E. (1985). An investigation into factors affecting attitudes toward science of secondary school students in Jordan. Science Education 69: 3–18.
Hill, O. W., Pettus, W. C., and Hedin, B. A. (1990). Three studies of factors affecting the attitudes of blacks and females toward science and school science-related careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 289–314.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1993a). LISREL 8 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software Inc, Chicago, Illinois.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1993b). PRELIS 2 User's Reference Guide, Scientific Software Inc, Chicago, Illinois.
Keeves, J. P. (1975). The home, the school, and achievement in mathematics and science. Science Education 59: 439–460.
Koballa, T. R., and Crawley, F. E. (1985). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics 85: 222–232.
Kremer, B. K., and Walberg, H. J. (1981). A synthesis of social and psychological influences on science learning. Science Education 65: 11–23.
Lin, B., and Crawley, F. E. (1987). Classroom climate and sciencerelated attitudes of junior high school students in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 579–591.
McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics 16: 163–200.
Meredith, W., and Tisak, J. (1984, October). “Tuckerizing” curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
Meredith, W., and Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55: 107–122.
Miller, J. D., Hoffer, T., Suchner, R. W., Brown, K. G., and Nelson, C. (1992). LSAY Codebook: Student, Parent, and Teacher Data for 1992 Cohort Two for Longitudinal Years One Through Four (1987- 1991), Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, IL.
Muthén, B. (1987). LISCOMP Analysis of Linear Structural Equations with a Comprehensive Measurement Model: Theoretical Integration and User's Guide, Scientific Software Inc, Mooresville, IN.
Muthén, B. (1991). Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In Collins, L., and Horn, J. (Eds.), Best Methods for the Analysis of Change: Recent Advances, Unanswered Questions, Future Directions, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 1–7.
Muthén, B. (1993). Latent variable modeling of growth with missing data and multilevel data. In Cuadras, C. M., and Rao, C. R. (Eds.), Multivariate Analysis: Future Directions 2, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
National Science Foundation. (1988). Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering (NSF 88- 301), Author, Washington, DC.
Otto, P. B. (1991). One sex one science. School Science and Mathematics 91: 367–372.
SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS Language and Procedures: Usage, Version 6, Author, Cary, NC.
Schibeci, R. A. (1983). Selecting appropriate attitudinal objectives for school science. Science Education 67: 595–603.
Schibeci, R. A. (1989). Home, school, and peer group influences on student attitudes and achievement in science. Science Education 73: 13–24.
Shrigley, R. L. (1983). The attitude concept and science teaching. Science Education 67: 425–442.
Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R., and Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defining attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 25: 659–678.
Simpson, R. D., and Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education 69(4): 511–526.
Simpson, R. D., and Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education 74: 1–18.
Simpson, R. D., and Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education 66: 763–781.
Talton, E. L., and Simpson, R. S. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Science Education 69: 19–24.
Talton, E. L., and Simpson, R. D. (1986). Relationships of attitude towards self, family, and school with attitude toward science among adolescents. Science Education 70: 365–374.
Talton, E. L., and Simpson, R. D. (1987). Relationships of attitude toward classroom environment with attitude toward and achievement in science among tenth grade biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24: 507–525.
Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32: 387–398.
Willett, J. B. (1994). Measuring change more effectively by modeling individual change over time. In Husen, T., and Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. ed. 2, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
Willett, J. B., and Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin 116: 363–381.
Wright, J. D., and Hounshell, P. B. (1981). A survey of interest in science for participants in a junior science and humanities symposium. School Science and Mathematics 81: 378–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
George, R. Measuring Change in Students' Attitudes Toward Science Over Time: An Application of Latent Variable Growth Modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology 9, 213–225 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009491500456
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009491500456