Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 259–286 | Cite as

Effects of Conflict Styles and Conflict Severity on Quality of Life of Men and Women in Family Businesses

  • Sharon M. Danes
  • Ronit D. Leichtentritt
  • Michael E. Metz
  • Catherine Huddleston-Casas
Article

Abstract

Studies show that family businesses need to manage conflict, but there has been little research on different conflict manifestations and their impact on families involved in businesses together. This study investigates the impact of six conflict styles on severity of conflict and quality of life for husbands and wives in 206 farm family businesses. Data analysis was done using structural equation modeling, with independent models for each gender. For men, the assertion style negatively impacted, and aggression positively impacted the severity of conflict; for women, aggression and withdrawal styles positively impacted, and denial negatively impacted severity of conflict. There was a strong negative relationship between severity of conflict and quality of life for both men and women in family businesses.

conflict conflict style family business quality of life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Baucom, D. H., & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  3. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S., & Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 31-38.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Bork, D. (1986). Family business, risky business: How to make it work. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, M. L. (1990). Coping efforts and marital satisfaction: Measuring marital coping and its correlates. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(2), 463-474.Google Scholar
  8. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3-33.Google Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. (1975). What is a quality of life indicator? Social Indicators Research, 2(1), 65-69.Google Scholar
  10. Burman, B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (1993). America's angriest home videos: Behavioral contingencies observed in home reenactments of marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 28-39.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R., & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship conflict. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 129-144.Google Scholar
  14. Cupach, W. R., & Canary, D. J. (1995). Managing conflict and anger: Investigating the sex stereotype hypothesis. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 233-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Danes S. M., & Rettig, K. D. (1993). Farm wives' business and household decision involvement in times of economic stress. Home Economics Research Journal, 21(3), 307-333.Google Scholar
  16. Danes, S. M., Zuiker, V., Kean, R., & Arbuthnot, J. (1999). Predictors of family business tensions and goal achievement. Family Business Review, 12(3), 241-252.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103-157.Google Scholar
  19. Dyer, W. G., Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Emery, R. E. (1992). Family conflicts and their developmental implications: A conceptual analysis of meanings for the structure of relationships. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 270-298). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Epstein, N., & Baucom, D. H. (1989). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. In A. Freeman, K. M. Simon, L. E. Beutler, & H. Arkowitz (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy (pp. 491-513). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  22. Epstein, N., DeGiovanni, I. S., & Jayne-Lazarus, C. (1978). Assertion training for couples. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Psychiatry, 9(2), 149-155.Google Scholar
  23. Freudenberger, H. J., Freedheim, D. K., & Kurtz, T. S. (1989). Treatment of individuals in family businesses. Psychotherapy, 26(1), 47-53.Google Scholar
  24. Gano-Phillips, S., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Family conflict, divorce, and children's adjustment. In M. A. Fitzpatrick & A. L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 206-231). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1991). Family therapy: An overview. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  26. Gottman, J. M. (1990). Finding the laws of personal relationships. In I. E. Sigel & G. H. Brody (Eds.), Methods of family research: Biographies of research projects, Volume I: Normal families (pp. 249-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  27. Gottman, J. M. (1993a). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 57-75.Google Scholar
  28. Gottman, J. M. (1993b). The role of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6-15.Google Scholar
  29. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5-22.Google Scholar
  31. Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47-52.Google Scholar
  32. Heitler, S. M. (1990). From conflict to resolution: Strategies for diagnosis and treatment of distressed individuals, couples and families. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Kaye, K. (1991). Penetrating the cycle of sustained conflict. Family Business Review, 4(1), 21-44.Google Scholar
  36. Kaye, K. (1997). Caveat emptor: Commentary by Kenneth Kaye. Family Business Review, 10(2), 127-129.Google Scholar
  37. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family-controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59-71.Google Scholar
  38. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1996). Family business: Human dilemmas in the family firm. London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kurdek, L. A. (1991). Correlates of relationship satisfaction in cohabiting gay and lesbian couples: Integration of contextual, investment, and problem-solving models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 910-922.Google Scholar
  40. Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). The influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 56-68.Google Scholar
  41. Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 85-94.Google Scholar
  42. Liebowitz, B. (1986). Resolving conflict in the family owned business. Consultation: An Internation Journal, 5(3), 191-205.Google Scholar
  43. Lloyd, S. A. (1990). Conflict types and strategies in violent marriages. Journal of Family Violence, 5(3), 269-284.Google Scholar
  44. MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554-567.Google Scholar
  46. Markman, H. J., Floyd, F. J., Stanley, S. M., & Storaasli, R. D. (1988). Prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 210-217.Google Scholar
  47. McClendon, R., & Kadis, L. B. (1991). Family therapists and family business: A view of the future. Contemporary Family Therapy, 13(6), 641-651.Google Scholar
  48. McGonagle, K. A., Kessler, R. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (1993). The effects of marital disagreement style, frequency, and outcome on marital disruption. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(3), 385-404.Google Scholar
  49. Metz, M. E. (1993). The styles of conflict inventory (SCI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  50. Metz, M. E., & Dwyer, M. S. (1993). Relationship conflict management patterns among sex dysfunction, sex offender, and satisfied couples. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 19(2), 104-122.Google Scholar
  51. Metz, M. E., & Lutz, G. (1990). Dyadic playfulness differences between sexual and marital therapy couples. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 3, 169-182.Google Scholar
  52. Metz, M. E., Simon Rosser, B. R., & Strapko, N. (1994). Differences in conflict-resolution styles among heterosexual, gay, and lesbian couples. The Journal of Sex Research, 31(4), 293-308.Google Scholar
  53. Pike, G. R., & Sillars, A. L. (1985). Reciprocity of marital communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(3), 303-324.Google Scholar
  54. Quigley, B. M., & Leonard, K. E. (1999). Husband alcohol expectancies, drinking, and marital conflict styles as predictors of severe marital violence among newlywed couples. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(1), 49-59.Google Scholar
  55. Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. (1974). Communication, conflict, and marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenblatt, P. C. (1991). The interplay of family system and business system in family farms during economic recession. Family Business Review, 4(1), 45-57.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenblatt, P. C., & Albert, S. (1990). Management and succession: Intergenerational relationships in fact and metaphor. Marriage and Family Review, 15(3/4), 161-170.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenblatt, P. C., de Mik, L., Anderson, R. M., & Johnson, P. A. (1985). The family in business. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813-819.Google Scholar
  60. Sadler, P. (1990). Strategic sense and family sensibility. Director, 43(11), 27-29.Google Scholar
  61. Sayers, S. L., & Baucom, D. H. (1995). Multidimensional scaling of spouses' attributions for marital conflicts. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(6), 667-693.Google Scholar
  62. Schaap, C., Buunk, B., & Kerkstra, A. (1988). Marital conflict resolution. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 203-244). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters LTD.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, G. T., Snyder, D. K., Trull, T. J., & Monsma, B. R. (1988). Predicting relationship satisfaction from couples' use of leisure time. American Journal of Family Therapy, 16(1), 3-13.Google Scholar
  64. Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(4), 813-823.Google Scholar
  65. Stafford, K., Duncan, K., Danes, S. M., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review, 12(3), 197-208.Google Scholar
  66. Stenfert-Kroese, B. (1997). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for people with learning disabilities: Conceptual and contextual issues. In B. Stenfert-Kroese, D. Dagnan, & K. Loumidis (Eds.), Cognitive-behaviour therapy for people with learning disabilities (pp. 1-15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Stuart, R. B. (1980). Helping couples change: A social learning approach to marital therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  68. Szalai, A. (1980). The meaning of comparative research on the quality of life. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.), The Quality of Life: Comparative Studies (pp. 7-21). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  69. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199-208.Google Scholar
  70. Tyndall, L. W., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (1985). Spouses' cognitive styles and marital interaction patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 11(2), 193-202.Google Scholar
  71. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  72. Wicker, A. W., & Burley, K. A. (1991). Close coupling in work-family relationships: Making and implementing decisions in a new family business and at home. Human Relations, 44(1), 77-92.Google Scholar
  73. Wortman, S. M., Jr. (1994). Theoretical foundations for family owned business: A conceptual and research based paradigm. Family Business Review, 7(1), 3-27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon M. Danes
    • 1
  • Ronit D. Leichtentritt
    • 2
  • Michael E. Metz
    • 3
    • 4
  • Catherine Huddleston-Casas
    • 5
  1. 1.Family Social Science DepartmentUniversity of MinnesotaSt. Paul
  2. 2.Bob Shapell School of Social WorkTel Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Meta AssociatesSt. Paul
  4. 4.Department of Family Social ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaUSA
  5. 5.Family Science DepartmentUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations