Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 25–51 | Cite as

Measuring the Prevalence of Sector-Specific Problem Gambling: A Study of Casino Patrons

  • Susan Fisher

Abstract

This study is the first attempt to measure the prevalence of problem gambling attributable to a specific sector of the gambling industry. One thousand, one hundred and five casino patrons in 40 casinos in the UK were interviewed, face-to-face. Respondents were screened for problem gambling using a multiple response version of DSM-IV (DSM-IV-MR). The study found support for Eadington's (1988) hypothesis, that UK casinos could be largely sustained by regular players, among whom the prevalence of problem gambling is high. The study also found support for the hypothesis that, to the extent different gambling sectors are patronised by demographically different client groups, so the problem gamblers associated with them will reflect these client groups. The problem gamblers among the regular casino patrons were demographically distinct from the problem gamblers in the sample who showed a preference for other gambling forms. Other key findings support those found in other jurisdictions. Sector-specific prevalence studies may be the next step forward in epidemiological research on problem gambling. They have the major advantage of netting significantly more problem gamblers from much smaller samples than similar studies in the general population. They also have the potential to reveal the proportion of problem gamblers attributable to each sector, along with their demographic characteristics. Such information would result in more specific information being available for regulators seeking to minimise the social impact of problem gambling and those involved in the development of prevention and treatment strategies.

Problem gambling casinos epidemiology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edit.) DSM-IV. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, E. O. (1991). Profit, loss and fate: the entrepreneurial ethic and the practice of gambling in an overseas Chinese community. Modern China, 17, 2, 227-259.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. I. F. (1999). Further validation of the DSM-IV-MR scale as a measure of severity of problem gambling. Scotland: University of Glasgow (unpublished paper).Google Scholar
  4. Cabot, A. N., Thompson, W. N. & Tottenham, A. (1993).Asia. InAnthony N. Cabot, William N. Thompson, Andrew Tottenham (eds.) International Casino Law.Nevada: University of Nevada, Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.Google Scholar
  5. Ciarrocchi, J. & Richardson, R. (1989). Profile of compulsive gamblers in treatment: Update and comparisons. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5, 53-65.Google Scholar
  6. Ciarrocchi, J., Kirschner, N. M. & Fallik, F. (1991). Personality dimensions of male pathological gamblers, alcoholics and dually addicted gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 133-141.Google Scholar
  7. Custer, R. L. (1982). An overview of compulsive gambling. In: Addictive disorders update: Alcoholism, drug abuse, gambling, edited by Carone, P. A., Yoles, S.F., Kiefer, S.N., and Krinsky, L. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eadington, W. R. (1988). Issues and trends in world gaming. In: Gambling in Canada: Golden Goose or Trojan Horse? edited by Colin S. Campbell and John Lowman. British Columbia: School of Criminology, Vancouver Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, S. E. (1993). The pull of the fruit machine: a sociological typology of young fruit machine players. The Sociological Review, 41, 3, 446-474.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, S. E. (1993a). Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 3, 277-287.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, S. E. (1995). The amusement arcade as a social space for adolescents: an empirical study. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 71-86.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, S. E. (1996). Gambling and problem gambling among casino patrons. A report to a consortium of the British casino industry. England: Plymouth: University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, S. E. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research 7, 6, 509-538.Google Scholar
  14. Freestone, F. & How, A. “Any way up!Licensed bingo in Britain: A national survey. England: Worcester College of Higher Education & the Bingo Association of Great Britain.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. (1986). The gaming laws of Great Britain. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 8 (1).Google Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. R. (1984). The Chase: Career of the Compulsive Gambler, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Books.Google Scholar
  17. Lesieur, H. R. & Klein, R. (1987). Pathological gambling among high school students. Addictive Behaviors, 12, 129-13 5.Google Scholar
  18. Lesieur, H. R. & Rosenthal, M. D. (1993). Analysis of pathological gambling for the Task Force on DSM4V In Thomas A. Widiger, Allen Frances, Harold Pincus & Ruth Ross (eds.), Source Book for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition: Volume Four. Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  19. Livingston, J. (1974). Compulsive gamblers: observations on action and abstinence. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  20. Miers, D. (1987). The Gaming Board for Great Britain: enforcement and judicial restraint. In R. Baldwin and C. McCrudden eds. Regulation and Public Law. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  21. Mintel International. (1995). Mintel Lottery Survey 1995. London: Author.Google Scholar
  22. National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago (NORC) (1999). Overview of National Survey and Community Database Research on Gambling Behavior: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Illinois: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Neal, M. (1999). The ongoing effects of deregulation on betting shop customer profile and behaviour. Managing Leisure, 4, 1-16.Google Scholar
  24. Promus Co. (1995). Harrah's Survey of US. Casino Entertainment (pamphlet). Memphis, TN: Promus Co.Google Scholar
  25. Ramirez, L. F, McCormick, R. A., Russo, A. M., & Taber, J. I. (1984). Patterns of substance abuse in pathological gamblers undergoing treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 8, 425-428.Google Scholar
  26. Rothschild, (Lord) (1978). The Report of the Royal Commission on Gambling. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  27. Wynne, H. L, Smith, G. L., & Volberg, R. A. (1994). Gambling and Problem Gambling in Alberta: Final report. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Lotteries and Gaming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Fisher
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Research into the Social Impact of Gambling, Department Sociology, Faculty of Human SciencesUniversity of PlymouthDevonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations