Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 131–153 | Cite as

Technology in Science Teacher Education: Survey of Current Uses and Desired Knowledge among Science Educators

  • Jon E. Pedersen
  • Randy K. Yerrick


  1. Aikenhead, G. (1992). The integration of STS in science education. Theory Into Practice, Winter, p.27–35.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (1987). Teaching Teachers: Facts and Figures. Washington, DC; Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (1987). Teaching Teachers: Facts and Figures. Washington, DC; Author.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, HJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Barker, B. O. (1983). Computer awareness for rural educators. Paper prepared for the Fifth Annual Utah Small/Rural School Conference, Ephraim, UT.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, C. F. & Carlson, E. (1988). Measuring computer literacy of teacher trainers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(3), 247–253.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, C. F., Lu, C. R., Belzer, S. J., & Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the Uses of Technology in Science Education. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 466–490). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Bettencourt, A., & Gallagher, J. (1990, April) “Changing the Conversation: When Science Teachers Start Talking about Instruction”, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334157)Google Scholar
  11. Blythe, K. & Nutthal, W. (1992). Reflections on the impact of an information technology development programme upon the planned curriculum of an institution engaged in initial teacher training. Developing Information Technology in Teacher Education, 2(2), 3–50.Google Scholar
  12. Bork, A. (1991). The history of technology and education. In N. Knupfer et al. (Eds.), Educational computing social foundations: A symposium (pp. 350–380). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334990)Google Scholar
  13. Bosch, K.A., (1993). What are the computer realities in the classrooms of the nineties? Current Issues in Middle Level Education. 2(1), p. 9–15.Google Scholar
  14. Bradshaw, L. (1997) Institutionalizing Technology in Schools: The Staff Development Challenge. In Kester, D. (Ed.), Conference Annual of Southeast Regional Technology and Teaching Conference. Greenville, NC: East Carolina University, School of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Bruder, I., (1989). Future teachers: Are they prepared? Electronic Learning. January/February, p. 32–39.Google Scholar
  16. Bruder, I., (1993). Redefining science: Technology and the new science literacy. Electronic Learning. 12(6) p. 20–24.Google Scholar
  17. Brusic, S. A. (1992). Achieving STS Goals Through Experiential Learning. Theory Into Practice, Winter, p.44–51.Google Scholar
  18. Borg, R. W. & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Cocoran, M. & Clark, S. (1984). Professional socialization and contemporary career attitudes of three faculty generations. Research in Higher Education, 20(1), p.131–153.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, A. (1991). The Role of Computer Technology in Restructuring Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73 (September): 28–36.Google Scholar
  21. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. De Vore, P.W. (1992). Technological Literacy and Social Purpose. Theory Into Practice, Winter, p.59–63.Google Scholar
  23. Dwyer, D.C. (1996). The imperative to change our schools. In C. Fisher & K. Yocum (Eds.) Education and Technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms (pp. 15–43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Educational Testing Service, (1988). The Nations Report Card. The Educational testing Service: Author.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, J.D. & Kuerbis, P.J., (1993). Implementing microcomputers in science teaching. Science Teacher Education. 3(3), p. 65–75.Google Scholar
  26. Goldin, G. A. & Ellis, J. R. (1984). Performance Difficulties Reported by First-Year Public School Science and Mathematics Teachers in Illinois. Technical Report, Northern Illinois University, De Kalb, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, R., Raphael, J., Keller, J., Tobias, S. (1998). Teaching high school science using image processing: A case study of implementation of computer technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 297–327.Google Scholar
  28. Handler, M. & Pigott, T. (1994). Schools of education and technology preparation: Are we doing our job? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, M. & Hoot, J. (1986). Computers and the elementary teacher. Educational Horizons, 62, 73–75.Google Scholar
  30. Lichtman, D. (1979). Survey of educators' attitudes towards computers. Creative Computing, 48–50.Google Scholar
  31. Linn, M. (1986) The cognitive effects of computer learning environments. The Journal of Education and Computing Research.Google Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J.E. (1990). The contexts in question: The secondary school workplace. In M.W. McLaughlin, J.E. Talbert, & N. Bascia (Eds.) The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: Teacher realities. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  33. Means, B., Blando, J., Olson, K., Middleton, T., Morocco, C.C., Remz, A.R., & Zorfass, J. (1993) Using Technology to support Education Reform. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Available FTP: Google Scholar
  34. McIntyre, S. R., & Tlusty, R. H. (1995) “Computer Mediated Discourse: Electronic dialogue journaling and reflective practice.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 232).Google Scholar
  35. Mehan. H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice?. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 20(1), 4–22.Google Scholar
  36. Mehloff, C. E. & Sisler, G. (1989). Knowledge, commitment, and attitudes of home economics faculty towards computers. Home Economics Journal, 17(4), p.300–308.Google Scholar
  37. Melhorn, J. M., Legler, W. K. & Clark, G. M. (1979). Current attitudes of medical personnel towards computers. Computers and Biomedical Research, 20(1), p.327–334.Google Scholar
  38. McGee, G. W. (1986). The Implementation and Improvement of an Effective Microcomputer Curriculum in the Elementary School. Illinois-School-Research-and-Development, 22(2), p.44–51.Google Scholar
  39. Mueller. R., Husband, T., Christou, C., & Sun, A. (1992). Preservice teacher attitudes towards computer technology. A log-linear analysis. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 4(2), 23–27. Linking for Learning: A New Course For Education. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC. (1989).Google Scholar
  40. National Research Council. (1996). Washington, DC: National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (OTA-EHR-616) Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  42. Ronald, J. (1982). Attitudes and learning needs of nursing educators with respect to computers. Dissertation Abstracts, 42, 2879A.Google Scholar
  43. Roth, W.M., (1995). Affordances of computers in teacher-student interaction: The case of Interactive Physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32,(4), 329–347.Google Scholar
  44. Scardamalia, M & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1,(1), 37–68.Google Scholar
  45. Scardamalia, M & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36(5) 37–41.Google Scholar
  46. Scardamalia, M & Bereiter, C., McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51–68.Google Scholar
  47. Scardamalia, M & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Sutphin, D. (1987). Educating teachers on instructional applications of microcomputers, T.H.E. Journal, 14(6), p.54–58.Google Scholar
  49. Thornton, R. (1987). Access to college science: Microcomputer-based laboratories for the naive learner, Collegiate Microcomputing, 1, 100–106.Google Scholar
  50. Thornton, R. & Sokoloff, D. (1990). Learning Motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools, American Journal of Physics, 58,(9), 858–867Google Scholar
  51. Thornton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching. Physics Education, 22(1), 230–238Google Scholar
  52. Trowbridge, L. W. & Bybee, R.W. (1990). Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher: Fifth Edition. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  53. Troutman, A. P.(1991). Attitudes toward personal and school use of computers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  54. Trowbridge, L.W. & Bybee, R.W. (1990). Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher: Fifth Edition. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
  55. Turner, J.A. (1989). Teacher-training colleges' slow move to computers blamed for schools' lag in integrating technology. Chronicle-of-Higher-Education, 35(45), p. 9–10.Google Scholar
  56. Willis, J & Mehlinger, H. (1996). Information Technology and Teacher Education, In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. (pp. 978–1028), New York: McMillian.Google Scholar
  57. Zaltman, G. & Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for Planned Change. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Zammit, S. A. (1992). Factors Facilitating or Hindering the Use of Computers in Schools. Educational Research, 34(1), p.57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon E. Pedersen
    • 1
  • Randy K. Yerrick
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OklahomaNormanU.S.A.
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations