Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 241–270 | Cite as

Reconstructing Classroom Facts: Transforming Lower Track Science Classrooms

  • Randy Yerrick
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 3–41.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D. (1990). Halves pieces and twoth: Constructing representational contexts in teaching fractions. East Lansing: Michigan University.Google Scholar
  4. Baum-Brunner, S. (1993). Stepping and stepping out: The making of hindsight, revision, and teachers' research. In M. Cochran-Smith & S. L. Lytle (Eds.), Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Biddle, B., & Anderson, D. (1986). Theory, methods, knowledge, and research on teaching. In M. Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of educational research (pp. 230–252). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  6. Brickhouse, N. W., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teachign, 29, 471–485.Google Scholar
  7. Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471–481.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157–178.Google Scholar
  9. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.Google Scholar
  11. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In R. Archambault (Ed.), John Dewey on Education: Selected essays (pp. 313–338). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers' decision-making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467–501.Google Scholar
  15. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eichenger, D., Anderson, C. W., Palincsar, A. S., & David, Y. (1991, April). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument, and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  17. Evertson, C., & Green, J. (1986). Observation as inquiry. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of educational research (pp. 162–213). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Florio-Ruane, S. (1987). Sociolinguistics for educational researchers. American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 185–197.Google Scholar
  20. Florio-Ruane, S., & Walsh, M. (1980). Teachers as colleague in classroom research. In H. Trueba, G. Guthrie, & K. Au (Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography. Rowy, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, J. (1989). What is literacy? Journal of Education, 171(1), 18–25.Google Scholar
  22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  23. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151–183.Google Scholar
  24. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science: Some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24, 41–52.Google Scholar
  26. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.Google Scholar
  27. Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers' functional paradigms. Science Education, 71, 117–134.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lederman, N. G. (1995, January). Teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Factors that mediate translation into classroom practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charleston, WV.Google Scholar
  31. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.Google Scholar
  32. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, K. B., & Roth, W. M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning: Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26, 103–129.Google Scholar
  34. Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 447–474.Google Scholar
  35. McNeil, L. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Michaels, S., & O'Connor, M. C. (1990, July). Literacy as reasoning within multiple discourses: Implications for policy and educational reform. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers Summer Institute, Newton, MA.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Page, R. N. (1991). Lower track classrooms: A curricular and cultural perspective. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. Poole, D. (1994). Routine testing practices and the linguistic construction of knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 125–150.Google Scholar
  42. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839–854.Google Scholar
  43. Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.Google Scholar
  44. Roth, W. M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared (arti) facts and concepts as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475–502.Google Scholar
  45. Roth, W. M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 709–736.Google Scholar
  46. Roth, W. M. (1997). Interactional structures during grade 4–5 open-design engineering unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 273–302.Google Scholar
  47. Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A case of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73–128.Google Scholar
  48. Roth, W. M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From truth to invented reality: A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145–179.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, T. (1986). Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: Can teachers' questions distort scientific authority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), 27–45.Google Scholar
  50. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Washington, DC: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Schwab, J. J. (1962). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education (pp. 229–273). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.Google Scholar
  54. Traweek, S. (1988). Beam times and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1989). Cheche Konnen: Science and literacy in language minority classrooms (BBN Technical Report No. 7305). Cambridge, MA: TERC Communications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randy Yerrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science EducationEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations