Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Effects of Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of the Causes of Night and Day and the Seasons

  • Ronald K. Atwood
  • Virginia A. Atwood
Article

Keywords

Elementary Teacher Preservice Elementary Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atwood, V. A., & Atwood, R. K. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of what causes day and night. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 290–294.Google Scholar
  2. Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553–563.Google Scholar
  3. Aron, R., Francek, M., Nelson, B., & Bisard, W. (1994). Atmospheric misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 61, 31–33.Google Scholar
  4. Bendall, S., Goldberg, F., & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1169–1187.Google Scholar
  5. Bitner, B. L. (1992). Preservice elementary and secondary science methods teachers: Comparison of formal reasoning, ACT science, process skill, and physical science misconceptions scores. Columbus: Ohio State University, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 781)Google Scholar
  6. Boyle, R. K., & Maloney, D. P. (1991). Effect of written text on usage of Newton's third law. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 123–139.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J. D., & Bye, N. J. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Ed.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 173–205). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 17–34.Google Scholar
  9. Callison, P. L., & Wright, E. L. (1993, April). The effect of teaching strategies using models on preservice elementary teachers' conceptions about earth-sun-moon relationships. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  10. Callison, P. L., & Wright, E. L. (1994, January). The implications of complex abstract concepts on elementary science instruction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Education of teachers in Science, El Paso, TX.Google Scholar
  11. Champagne, A., Klopfer, L. E., & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074–1079.Google Scholar
  12. Dykstra, D. I., Jr., Boyle, C. F., & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76, 615–652.Google Scholar
  13. Feher, E., & Rice, K. (1987). A comparison of teacher-student conceptions noptics. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar: Misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (pp. 108–11&). Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 271–301.Google Scholar
  15. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66, 623–633.Google Scholar
  16. Glasson, G. E., & Teates, T. G. (1989, March-April). The relationships among alternative physical science conceptions, formal reasoning ability, and science background of preservice teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Gunstone, F. G., Gray, C. M. R., & Searle, P. (1992). Some long-term effects of uninformed conceptual change. Science Education, 76, 175–197.Google Scholar
  18. Hashwh, M. (1988). Descriptive studies of students' conceptions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 121–134.Google Scholar
  19. Heller, P. M., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 259–275.Google Scholar
  20. Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383–396.Google Scholar
  21. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. A. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.Google Scholar
  22. Hills, G. L. C. (1989). Students' "untutored" beliefs about natural phenomena: Primitive science or common sense? Science Education, 73, 155–186.Google Scholar
  23. Lane, C. L., & French, D. (1994, January). Encouraging reflection in preservice teachers through comparing student preconceptions with their own. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, El Paso, TX.Google Scholar
  24. Lefrancois, G. R. (1988). Psychology for teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. McDermott, L. C. (1990). A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers. American Journal of Physics, 58, 734–742.Google Scholar
  26. Muthukrishna, N., Carnine, D., Grossen, B., & Miller, S. (1993). Children's alternative frameworks: Should they be directly addressed in science instruction? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 233–248.Google Scholar
  27. Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  28. Pines, A. L., & West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a source-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70, 583–604.Google Scholar
  29. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.Google Scholar
  30. Schneps, M. H. (1988). A private universe [Videotape]. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid Films.Google Scholar
  31. Schoon, K. J. (1989, March-April). Misconceptions in the earth sciences: A cross-age study. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  32. Schoon, K. J. (1995). The origin and extent of alternative conception in the earth and space sciences: A survey of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7, 27–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald K. Atwood
    • 1
  • Virginia A. Atwood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations