Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 309–321

A Student Evaluation of Molecular Modeling in First Year College Chemistry

  • Julie B. Ealy
Article

Abstract

This three-year study involved an evaluation of molecular modeling by students in first year college chemistry. The molecular modeling program utilized was Spartan (Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine, California) on a UNIX-based platform with Silicon Graphics Indigo series workstations. A treatment group of 129 students visited a computer room four times during the semester for two-hour sessions. They completed exercises on periodic trends in atoms, structure of molecules, electronic structure of molecules such as MO and valence bond theory, and properties of organic molecules. The students were required to complete an evaluation of the molecular modeling computer experience at the end of the semester regarding aspects such as: effectiveness, integration with course content, interest, benefit, and advantages and disadvantages. Also obtained through the evaluation were students' opinions regarding the helpfulness of the molecular modeling computer experience for 3-D visualization of atomic and molecular structure and whether their understanding of atomic and molecular structure was enhanced. The first two years of the study constituted a pilot study and data for this study were obtained in the third year. Though the specifics are not reported here, quantitatively the achievement of the treatment and non-treatment groups was also assessed. There was a significant difference in achievement on the Final Exam of the semester (p = 0.0067) between the treatment and non-treatment groups on multiple choice questions pertaining to concepts of resonance, dipole moment, and atomic/molecular stoichiometry.

Evaluation molecular modeling first year college chemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baker, S. R. and Talley, L. (1972). The relationship of visualization skills to achievement in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 49(11): 775–776.Google Scholar
  2. Bartell, L. S. (1968). Molecular geometry. Bonded versus nonbonded interactions. Journal of Chemical Education 45(12): 754–766.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, C. F., Lu, C. R., Belzer, S. J., and Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the uses of technology in science education. In Gabel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 466–490.Google Scholar
  4. Box, V. G. S. (1991). Computer-assisted molecular modeling for undergraduate organic chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education 68(8): 662–664.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. B. and Lipkowitz, K. B. (1982). Molecular mechanics. The method and its underlying philosophy. Journal of Chemical Education 59(4), 269–274.Google Scholar
  6. Breslin, R. D. (1991). Report of the National Science Foundation workshop on dissemination and transfer of innovation in science, mathematics, and engineering education. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 174).Google Scholar
  7. Canales, C., Egan, L., and Zimmer, M. (1992). Molecular modeling as an inorganic chemistry exercise. Journal of Chemical Education 69(1): 21–22.Google Scholar
  8. Casanova, J. (1993). Computer-based molecular modeling in the curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education 70(11): 904–909.Google Scholar
  9. Casanova, J. (1996). Computers in the classroom—what works and what doesn't. Computers in Chemistry Education Newsletter, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan 73: 28–36.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, P. J. (1982). Molecular mechanics. Illustrations of its application. Journal of Chemical Education 59(4): 275–277.Google Scholar
  12. Culp, G. H. and Lagowski, J. J. (1971). Studies involving the application of computer techniques to undergraduate organic chemistry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 8: 357–362.Google Scholar
  13. DeKock, R. L., Madura, J. D., Rioux, F., and Casanova, J. (1993). Computational chemistry in the undergraduate curriculum. In Lipkowitz, K. B., and Boyd, D. B. (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry IV, VCH Publishers, Inc, New York, pp. 149–228.Google Scholar
  14. Ealy, J. B. (1998). Evaluation of a Constructivist Use of Molecular Modeling in First Year College Chemistry, Doctoral Dissertation. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ege, S. and Chapman, O. (1993). Innovation and change in the chemistry curriculum. NSF 94-19.Google Scholar
  16. Gotwals, Jr., R. R. (1995). Scientific visualization in chemistry, better living through chemistry, better chemistry through pictures: Scientific visualization for secondary chemistry students. Scientific Visualization in Mathematics and Science Teaching, In Thomas, D. A. (Ed.), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, (Service No. ED 361 171 ERIC Document Reproduction), Charlottesvilla, Virginia.Google Scholar
  17. Hanks, T. W. (1994). Using graphics to illustrate complementary approaches to molecular structure and reactivity. Journal of Chemical Education 71(1): 62–66.Google Scholar
  18. Holliday, W. G. (1975). The effects of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 12(1): 77–83.Google Scholar
  19. Jarret, R. M. and Sin, N. (1990). Molecular mechanics as an organic chemistry laboratory exercise. Journal of Chemical Education 67(2): 153–155.Google Scholar
  20. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research 61(2): 179–211.Google Scholar
  21. Krieger, J. H. (1996). New software kicks in. Chemical and Engineering News September. 30–37.Google Scholar
  22. Krieger, J. H. (1997). Computational chemistry impact. Chemical and Engineering News May. 30–40.Google Scholar
  23. Lipkowitz, K. (1984). Using the QCPE holdings in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education 61(12): 1051–1052.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, N. H. (1997). Integration of computational chemistry into the chemistry curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education 75(2): 241–243.Google Scholar
  25. McCormick, B. H., DeFanti, T. A., and Brown, M. (Eds.) Visualization in scientific computing. Computer Graphics 21(6): I-D-8.Google Scholar
  26. Milner, S. and Wildberger, A. M. (1974). How should computers be used in learning? Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 1(1): 7–12.Google Scholar
  27. Neisser, U. (1997). Rising scores on intelligence tests. The American Scientist 85: 440–447.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenfeld, S. (1991). Molecular modeling as an integral part of an advanced lab course. Journal of Chemical Education 68(6): 488–489.Google Scholar
  29. Sauers, R. S. (1991). Molecular mechanics in the Undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education 68(10): 816–818.Google Scholar
  30. Shusterman, G. P. and Shusterman, A. J. (1997). Teaching chemistry with electron density models. Journal of Chemical Education 74(7): 771–776.Google Scholar
  31. Simpson, J. M. (1989). Molecular mechanics/computer graphics experiment for the undergraduate organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education 66(5): 406–407.Google Scholar
  32. Talley, L. H. (1973). The use of three-dimensional visualization as a moderator in the higher cognitive learning of concepts in college level chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 10(3): 263–269.Google Scholar
  33. Weber, J., Fluekiger, P., and Morgantini, P-Y. (1992). Molecular graphics and chemistry. Educational Media International 29(4): 247–53.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, E. K. (1997). Thinking instead of 'cookbooking'. Chemical and Engineering News May. 33–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie B. Ealy
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia University/Rye Country Day SchoolNew York

Personalised recommendations