Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 461–467 | Cite as

Trends in Bio-Behavioral Gambling Studies Research: Quantifying Citations

  • Gabriel B. Eber
  • Howard J. Shaffer


Both the National Gambling Impact Study Commission and the National Academy of Sciences have evaluated the current state of gambling studies research in general while making specific suggestions for future efforts in the psychological and biomedical areas in particular. Recognizing the importance of evaluating the state of the field on a macro level, this paper considers and categorizes several decades of psychological and biomedical gambling research. By examining the number of references to gambling in two major bibliographic databases, quantifiable trends and observations are presented about gambling-related psychological and biomedical research. Two trends in particular are salient: the rate at which gambling-related articles are published in scholarly journals is increasing, and the plurality of these articles deals with issues of cognition and personality as related to gambling.

gambling research technology computer Internet addiction gambling disordered gambling construct validity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychological Association. (1999, August 31). What is PsychInfo. Available: http:// Scholar
  2. Freud, S. (1897). Extracts from the Fleiss papers, letter 55. In J. Strachey & A. Freud (Eds.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 1 (pp. 240-241). London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, S. (1929). Dostoevski and parricide. The Realist, 1, 18-33.Google Scholar
  4. Institute for Scientific Information. (1998). EndNote (Version 3.0) [Computer Software]. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
  5. Korn, D.S. & Shaffer, H.J. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Unpublished manuscript, Division on Addictions at Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
  6. Lindner, R.M. (1950). The psychodynamics of gambling. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 269, 93-107.Google Scholar
  7. National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). National gambling impact study commission report. Washington, D.C.: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.Google Scholar
  8. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: a critical review. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  9. National Library of Medicine. (1999, September 14). Fact sheet: Medline. Available: Scholar
  10. SPSS Inc. (1997). SPSS (Version 8.0) [Computer Software]. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel B. Eber
    • 1
  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard Medical SchoolUSA
  2. 2.Division on AddictionsHarvard Medical SchoolBoston

Personalised recommendations