Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 111–126 | Cite as

Imaging Homelessness and Homeless People: Visions and Strategies Within the Movement(s)

  • Rob Rosenthal


The “deserving versus undeserving” distinctions typically applied to poor people are examined as applied to homeless people. When these labels are applied by others, three categories—Lackers, Slackers, and Unwilling Victims—appear rather than a binary division. Further, the role these images play within antihomelessness movements is examined. Images shape strategies, and strategies shape images, both consciously and unconsciously. Three “clusters” of image and strategy are examined, and the implications for the antihomelessness movement discussed.

homelessness labeling social movements deserving versus undeserving 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banyard, V. L., & Graham-Bermann, S. A. (1995). Building an empowerment policy paradigm: Selfreported strengths of homeless mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 479–491.Google Scholar
  2. Barak, G. (1991). Gimme shelter. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, A. S., & Burnes, D. W. (1993). A nation in denial. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  4. Blasi, G. (1994). And we are not seen. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 563–586.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, J. (1992). The visible poor. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, M. B. (1994). Overcoming obstacles to forming empowerment groups. Social Work, 39, 742–749.Google Scholar
  7. Cress, D. (1990). Look out world, the meek are getting it ready. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual meeting, Washington, DC, August 13, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Curo, F. (1996a) (1/3/96). Not adversarial. Homeless discussion list. homeless/jan96/ 0107.html.Google Scholar
  9. Curo, F. (1996b) (1/26/96). Provider/providee. Homeless discussion list. homeless/jan96/0204.html.Google Scholar
  10. Curo, F. (1996c) (1/26/96). More from San Diego. Homeless discussion list. mail/homeless/jan96/0194.html.Google Scholar
  11. Epel, E., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Sociology 29, 575–596.Google Scholar
  12. Foscarinis, M. (1991). The politics of homelessness. American Psychologist, 46, 1232–1238.Google Scholar
  13. Funiciello, T. (1988). Give them shelters. The Nation, 246, 469–472.Google Scholar
  14. Gallup Organization. (1995). Homeless but not helpless. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Mission.Google Scholar
  15. Gliedman, J. (1987) [1979]. The wheelchair rebellion. Reprinted in Ian Robertson (Ed.), The Social World. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  16. Gould, J. (1992). The battle of the Pacific Hotel: Part one. Real Change, October 1992.Google Scholar
  17. Graybill, J. (1995). Through the looking glass: Reflections on the Women's Forum. Real Change, December 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, T. (1995a). No apologies. Real Change, February 1995.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, T. (1995b) (4/10/95). Re: Empowerment. Homeless discussion list. OR219461-223573-/psn/homeless/mail-archives/1995/apr95.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, T. (1996a) (1/14/96). Re: not adversarial. Homeless discussion list. homeless/jan96/0108.html.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, T. (1996b). Personal communication to the author. August 5, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Hoch, C., & Slayton, R. (1989). New homeless and old. Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
  23. Katz, M. B. (1989). The undeserving poor. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  24. Koegel, P., Melamid, E., & Burnham, M. A. (1995). Childhood risk factors for homelessness among homeless adults. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1642–1649.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, B. A., Lewis, D. W., & Jones, S. H. (1992). Are the homeless to blame? A test of two theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 33, 535–552.Google Scholar
  26. McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.Google Scholar
  27. Mesler, B. (1995). The homeless learn how to hit back. Third Force, May/June, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, H. (1991). On the fringe. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  29. National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty. (1999). Out of Sight¶ Out of Mind?. Washington, DC: National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty.Google Scholar
  30. Platt, S. (1993). An image problem. New statesman & society, 6, 3–5.Google Scholar
  31. Records, J. (1996) (1/13/96). Homeless coalitions/government participation. Homeless discussion list. Scholar
  32. Rosenthal, R. (1989). Good cop/bad cop: A social movement dynamic. Paper presented to the Society for the Study of Social Problems annual meeting, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Homeless in paradise. Philadelphia: Temple.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenthal, R. (1996). Dilemmas of local antihomelessness movements. In Jim Baumohl (Ed.), Homelessness in America. Phoenix: Oryx.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenthal, R. (2000). Responses to homelessness: Past policies and future directions, in M. Stone, C. Hartman, & R. Bratt (Eds.), Housing: Foundation for a new social agenda (Philadelphia: Temple University, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Shefter, M. (1986). Political incorporation and the extrusion of the left. In Studies in American political development. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, D. (1993). Checkerboard square. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, D., & Cohen, M. B. (1991). The power of the people. Social Problems, 38, 543–561.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, K. (1996). Interview with the author. July 2, 1996, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Wright, T. (1997). Out of place. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  41. Wright, T. (1994). 'Tranquility City’ and shelters. Pre-publication draft. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Loyola University Chicago.Google Scholar
  42. Yeich, S. (1994). The Politics of ending homelessness. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Rosenthal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWesleyan UniversityMiddletown

Personalised recommendations