Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 239–253 | Cite as

QALYS and the Integration of Claims in Health-Care Rationing

  • Paul Anand
Article

Abstract

The paper argues against the polarisation of the health economics literature into pro- and anti-QALY camps. In particular, we suggest that a crucial distinction should be made between the QALY measure as a metric of health, and QALY maximisation as an applied social choice rule. We argue against the rule but for the measure and that the appropriate conceptualisation of health-care rationing decisions should see the main task as the integration of competing and possibly incommensurable normative claim types. We identify the main types as consequences, rights, social contracts, individual votes and community values and note situations in which the contribution of each claim type is limited. We go on to show that the integration of (at least some of) these claim types can be formalised within the mathematical framework provided by non-linear programming.

QALY rationing non-linear programming consequentialism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anand, P. and Wailoo, A. (1999) Utilities vs Rights to Publicly Provided Goods: Arguments and Evidence from Health-Care Rationing. Discussion Paper, The Open University.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (1993) Communitarianism and its Critics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, A. (1984) The Right to a Decent Minimum of Health Care. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13, 55–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckingham, K. (1993) A Note of HYE (Healthy Years Equivalent). Journal of Health Economics 11, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniels, N. (1993) Rationing Fairly. Bioethics 7, 224–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolan, P. and Cookson, R. (1999) Biases, Prejudices and Souffle. Paper given to the Birmingham Health Economics Study Group Meeting, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  8. Flynn, R. and Williams, G. (1997) Contracting for Health. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, R. (1994) Can We Restrict the Health Care Menu? Health Policy 27, 103–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mehrez, A. and Gafni, A. (1989) Quality-Adjusted Life-Years, Utility Theory and Health-Years Equivalents. Medical Decision-Making 9, 142–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mooney, G. (1998) 'Communitarian Claims' as an Ethical Basis for Allocating Health Care Resources. Social Science and Medicine 47, 1133–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mooney, G. and Jan, S. (1997) Vertical Equity: Weighting Outcomes? Or Establishing Procedures? Health Policy 39, 79–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morrison, G. C. (undated) Values Utilities, HYEs and QALYs. University of St Andrews, CRIEFF Discussion Paper, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Nelson, J. L. (1994) Publicity and Pricelessness: Grassroots Decisionmaking and Justice in Rationing. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19, 333–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nord, E. (1993) The Relevance of Health State After Treatment in Prioritizing Between Different Patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 19, 37–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nord, E. Richardson, J., Street, A., Kuhse, H. and Singer, P. (1995) Maximising Health Benefits vs. Egalitarianism. Social Science and Medicine 41, 1429–1437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oberholzer-Gee, Bohnet I. and Frey, B. S. (1997), Fairness and Competence in Democratic Decisions. Public Choice 91, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Redmayne, S. (1995) Reshaping the NHS. Birmingham: NAHAT.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, A. K. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  20. Sen, A. K. (1979) Personal Utilities and Public Judgements. Economic Journal 89, 537–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wagstaff, A. (1991) QALYS and Equity Efficiency Trade-Off. Journal of Health Economics 10, 21–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, A. (1992) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis - is it Ethical? Journal of Medical Ethics 18, 7–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Anand
    • 1
  1. 1.Economics DisciplineThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK (E-mail

Personalised recommendations