Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 29–46 | Cite as

A Feminist Perspective on Contract Theories from Law and Economics

  • Alice Belcher
Case Law Studies

Abstract

This article offers a feminist perspective on contract theories in law,economics and law-and-economics. It identifies masculine traits presentcontract theories in all three disciplines. It then describes andassesses some developments that appear to be ‘feminising’: Therecognition of the importance of social norms in contract theory andtheories of contract as relationship. The article's main claim is that amasculine model of decision-making persists even within the less overtlymasculine models of contract. The problem of sexually transmitted debtresulting from a surety contract is analysed in detail as a specificexample supporting the article's general argument. The article concludesthat the way forward is to be found in a recognition of other ways ofmaking decisions.

contract theory feminist law economics law-and-economics decision-making sexually transmitted debt 

REFERENCES

  1. Bem, S.L., The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  2. Calabresi, G., The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  3. Chodorow, N.J., The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1978), 264 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Coase, R.H., “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1969), 1-8.Google Scholar
  5. Crawford, V.P., “Long-Term Relationships Governed by Short-Term Contracts”, American Economic Review 78 (1988), 485-499.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenberg, M.A., “Contracts and Relationships”, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, ed. P. Newman (London, Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan, 1998).Google Scholar
  7. Fehlberg, B., Sexually Transmitted Debt (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 310 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Feinman, J., “The Significance of Contract Theory”, U. Cin. L. Rev. 58 (1990), 1283 (cited in S. Wheeler and J. Shaw, Contract Law: Cases, Materials and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)).Google Scholar
  9. Frug, M.J., Postmodern Legal Feminism (New York and London: Routledge, 1992), 214 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Gilligan, C., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1982), 184 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Gretton, G., “Sexually Transmitted Debt”, Scots Law Times (1997), 195-197.Google Scholar
  12. MacKenzie, R., “Beauty and the Beastly Bank:What Should Equity's FairyWand Do?”, in Feminist Perspectives in the Foundational Subjects of Law, ed. A. Bottomley (London, Cavendish, 1996), 149-171.Google Scholar
  13. MacNeil, I., The New Social Contract (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  14. Marshall, A., Principles of Economics (London and New York: Macmillan, 1890), 823 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, J., Feminism, Objectivity and Economics (London and New York: Routledge, 1996), 174 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Posner, R.A., Economic Analysis of Law (Boston and London: Little Brown, 1972), 722 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Salanie, B., The Economics of Contracts (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press, 1997), 223 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Scott Bierman, H. and Fernandez, L.F., Game Theory with Economic Applications (Reading MA: Addison Wesley, 1998), 450 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Sent, E., “Sargent versus Simon: Bounded Rationality Unbound”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (1997), 332.Google Scholar
  20. Ussher, J., Women's Madness: Misogyny or Mental Illness? (New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, and Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991).Google Scholar
  21. Wheeler, S. and Shaw, J., Contract Law: Cases, Materials and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 919 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Wong, S., “Constructive Trusts Over the Family Home: Lessons to be Learned from Other Commonwealth Jurisdictions?”, Legal Studies 18 (1998), 369-390.Google Scholar
  23. Young, P., “The Evolution of Conventions”, Econometrica 61 (1993), 57-84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Belcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LawUniversity of DundeeUK

Personalised recommendations