Chromosome Research

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Relevance of kinetochore size and microtubule-binding capacity for stable chromosome attachment during mitosis in PtK1 cells

  • Bruce F. McEwen
  • Ye Ding
  • Amy B. Heagle


Chromosomes attach to the mitotic spindle via their kinetochores. The average number of spindle microtubules binding to each kinetochore varies with species, the stage of mitosis, and the length of time that the kinetochore has been attached to the spindle. In this report, we investigate how kinetochore microtubule number varies with kinetochore size and chromosome size in PtK1 cells. From an analysis of serial-section electron micrographs, we determined that the average surface area of metaphase, taxol-treated metaphase, and anaphase kinetochores is 0.16 ± 0.05 μm2 (N = 181). Surprisingly, kinetochore microtubules are packed more densely on the smaller kinetochores, as seen by a reduction in the average spacing between kinetochore microtubules from 89 nm to 59 nm. Our interpretation of this result is that PtK1 cells require a minimum kinetochore microtubule-binding capacity for survival during repeated rounds of mitotic division. We estimate the lower limit to be 23 kinetochore microtubules and suggest that this capacity is required to ensure stable attachment during the dynamic and highly stochastic process of kinetochore fiber formation. There is a modest but statistically significant increase in kinetochore microtubule number with chromosome size, indicating that chromosome size is a minor determinant of kinetochore microtubule number.

cell division chromosome kinetochore microtubule mitosis vertebrate cell 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belmont LD, Hyman AA, Sawin KE, Mitchison TJ (1990) Realtime visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts. Cell 62: 579–589.Google Scholar
  2. Bickel PJ, Doksum KA (1977) Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas & Selected Topics. Oakland, CA: Holden Day.Google Scholar
  3. Carminati JL, Stearns T (1997) Microtubules orient the mitotic spindle in yeast through dynein-dependent interactions with the cell cortex. J Cell Biol 138: 629–641.Google Scholar
  4. Cassimeris L, Rieder CL, Rupp G, Salmon ED (1990) Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells. J Cell Sci 96: 9–15.Google Scholar
  5. Cherry LM, Johnston DA (1987) Size variation in kinetochores of human chromosomes. Hum Genet 75: 155–158.Google Scholar
  6. Cherry LM, Faulkner AJ, Grossberg LA, Balczon R (1989) Kinetochore size variation in mammalian chromosomes: an image analysis study with evolutionary implications. J Cell Sci 92: 281–289.Google Scholar
  7. Ding R, McDonald KL, McIntosh R (1993) Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles from the yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Biol 120: 141–151.Google Scholar
  8. Frank J, Radermacher M, Penczek P et al. (1996) SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J Struct Biol 116: 190–199.Google Scholar
  9. Fuge H (1978) Ultrastructure of the mitotic spindle. Int Rev Cytol 6(Suppl.): 1–58.Google Scholar
  10. Gorbsky GJ, Sammak PJ, Borisy GG (1988) Microtubule dynamics and chromosome motion visualized in living anaphase cells. J Cell Biol 106: 1185–1192.Google Scholar
  11. Hayden JH, Bowser, SS, Rieder, CL (1990) Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol 111: 1039–1045.Google Scholar
  12. Hays TS, Salmon ED (1990) Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules. J Cell Biol 110: 391–404.Google Scholar
  13. Inoué S, Salmon ED (1995) Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol Biol Cell 6: 1619–1640.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen CG (1982) Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J Cell Biol 92: 540–558.Google Scholar
  15. Levan A, Nichols WW, Peluse M, Coriell LL (1966) The stemline chromosomes of three cell lines representing different vertebrate classes. Chromosoma (Berl) 18: 343–358.Google Scholar
  16. Levan G (1970) Contributions to the chromosomal characterization of the PTK 1 rat-kangaroo cell line. Hereditas 64: 85–96.Google Scholar
  17. Li X, Nicklas RB (1995) Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373: 630–632.Google Scholar
  18. Lin H-P P, Ault JG, Church K (1981) Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosome identification and kinetochore microtubule numbers during the first and second meiotic divisions in males. Chromosoma (Berl) 83: 507–521.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald KL, O'Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR (1992) Kinetochore microtubules in PTK cells. J Cell Biol 118: 369–383.Google Scholar
  20. McEwen BF, Heagle AB, Cassels GO, Buttle KF, Rieder CL (1997) Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 137: 1567–1580.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED (1992) Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J Cell Biol 119: 569–582.Google Scholar
  22. Moens PB (1978) Kinetochores of grasshoppers with Robertsonian chromosome fusions. Chromosoma (Berl) 67: 41–54.Google Scholar
  23. Moens PB (1979) Kinetochore microtubule numbers of different sized chromosomes. J Cell Biol 83: 556–561.Google Scholar
  24. Nicklas RB (1989) The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 109: 2245–2255.Google Scholar
  25. Pearson ES, Hartley HO (1972) Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Vol. I, 3rdedn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson JB, Ris H (1976) Electron microscopic study of the spindle and chromosome movement in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 22: 219–242.Google Scholar
  27. Pierre RV (1985) Age and loss of the Y chromosome. In: Sanberg AA, ed. The Y Chromosome, pt B: Clinical aspects of Y Chromosome Abnormalities. New York: Liss, pp 53–60.Google Scholar
  28. Rieder CL (1982) The formation, structure and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol 79: 1–58.Google Scholar
  29. Rieder CL, Alexander SP (1990) Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol 110: 81–95.Google Scholar
  30. Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1994) Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 124: 223–233.Google Scholar
  31. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G (1994) Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 127: 1301–1310.Google Scholar
  32. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G (1995) The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 130: 941–948.Google Scholar
  33. Roos U-P (1973) Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. II. Kinetochore structure and function. Chromosoma (Berl) 41: 195–220.Google Scholar
  34. Skibbens RV, Petrie Skeen V, Salmon ED (1993) Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol 122: 859–875.Google Scholar
  35. Wendell KL, Wilson L, Jordan MA (1993) Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J Cell Sci 104: 261–274.Google Scholar
  36. Zhai Y, Kronebusch PJ, Borisy GG (1995) Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J Cell Biol 131: 721–734.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang D, Nicklas RB (1997) Chromosome congression in mini-spindles containing a single chromosome. Mol Biol Cell 8: 171a.Google Scholar
  38. Zinkowski RP, Meyne J, Brinkley BR (1991) The centromere-kinetochore complex: a repeat subunit model. J Cell Biol 113: 1091–1110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce F. McEwen
    • 1
  • Ye Ding
    • 1
  • Amy B. Heagle
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of HealthAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations