International Journal of Salt Lake Research

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 361–382 | Cite as

Hydrological exchange and subsurface water chemistry in streams varying in salinity in south-western Australia

  • A.J. Boulton
  • P. Marmonier
  • J.A. Davis


Many streams in Western Australia are naturally saline. In others, especiallyin the south-western corner, land-clearance and other human activities inthe catchment have accelerated rates of salinisation of surface andgroundwater. Trends in surface water salinity are well-documented but theextent of penetration of saline stream water into the sediments has beenlittle studied. As many of these streams have porous sandy beds and theirflows may derive from groundwater, hydrologic exchange patterns betweensurface water and subsurface hyporheic water were hypothesised togovern the water chemistry of such rivers. We predicted high rates ofhydraulic conductivity, leading to a close relationship between surface andsubsurface (to a depth of 50 cm) salinity, and to a lesser extent, pH anddissolved oxygen. Where surface and hyporheic water differed in salinity,other chemical differences were hypothesised to be similarly marked,perhaps resulting from disjunct shallow subsurface aquifers. Triplicatewells were sampled from upwelling and downwelling zones of thirteenstreams ranging in salinity from ca. 0.2 to 18 g L−1. Despite theseemingly-porous sandy beds at many sites, subsurface water chemistryonly 20–40 cm below the bed sometimes differed markedly from surfacewater. For example, hyporheic water was only one-fifth the salinity ofsurface water at some saline sites (e.g., the Tone River) or 20 per cent moresaline in streams with fresh surface water (e.g., the Weld River). At somesites of intermediate salinity (e.g., the Warren River), subsurface water wasup to three times fresher than surface or downwelling water. Percentagesaturation of dissolved oxygen in the hyporheic water was consistently low(< 40%) whereas pH was more acidic than surface water, presumably dueto microbial activity. Vertical hydraulic conductivity may be limited bylayers of fine sediments and clays, implying that the meso-scale (1–100 cm)hydrological dynamics within the hyporheic zones of these rivers are morecomplex than their sandy beds would indicate. Assumptions of ecosystemdynamics in saline streams must be tempered by an understanding ofhyporheic salinities as subsurface fresher water may support microbial andfaunal assemblages excluded from the surface benthos by high salinity. Insaline streams, as in fresh ones, the hyporheic zone is an importantcomponent of the stream ecosystem and equally prone to disruption byhuman activities.

Aral Sea salinity salinization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Analytical Software. 1996. Statistix for Windows Users Manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  2. Bakalovicz M. 1994. Water geochemistry: water quality and dynamics. In: Gibert J., Danielopol D.L. and J.A. Stanford (eds), Groundwater Ecology, pp. 97–127. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  3. Bayly, I.A.E. and Williams, W.D. 1973. Inland Waters and Their Ecology. Longman, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Boulton, A.J. 1999. The role of subsurface biological filters in gravel-bed river rehabilitation strategies. In: I. Rutherfurd and R. Bartley (eds) Second Australian Stream Management Conference: The Challenge of Rehabilitating Australia's Streams, pp. 81–86, CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  5. Boulton, A.J. and Suter, P.J. 1986. Ecology of temporary streams – an Australian perspective. In: P. De Deckker and W.D. Williams (eds) Limnology in Australia, pp. 313–327. CSIRO/Dr W. Junk, Melbourne/Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Boulton, A.J., Valett, H.M. & Fisher, S.G. 1992. Spatial distribution and taxonomic composition of the hyporheos of several Sonoran Desert streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 125: 37–61.Google Scholar
  7. Boulton, A.J., Findlay, S., Marmonier, P., Stanley, E.H. and Valett, H.M. 1998. The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 29: 59–81.Google Scholar
  8. Brunke M. & Gonser T. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology, 37, 1–33.Google Scholar
  9. Claret, C., Marmonier, P., Boissier, J-M., Fontvieille, D. and Blanc, P. 1997. Nutrient transfer between parafluvial interstitial water and river water: influence of gravel bar heterogeneity. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 657–670.Google Scholar
  10. Claret C., Marmonier P. and Bravard J.P. 1998. Seasonal dynamics of nutrients and biofilms in interstitial habitats in two contrasting riffles in a regulated large river. Aquat. Sci., 60: 33–55.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke KR and Warwick RM. 1994. Changes inMaroinvertebrate Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analyses and Interpretations. Natural Environment Research Council, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Dole-Oliver M-J. and Marmonier, P. 1992. Patch distribution of interstitial communities: prevailing factors. Freshwater Biology, 27, 177–191.Google Scholar
  13. Findlay, S. 1995. Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: the hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography 40(1): 159–164.Google Scholar
  14. Gibert, J., Dole-Oliver MJ, Marmonier P and Vervier P. 1990. Surface water-groundwater ecotones. In: R.J. Naiman, H. Décamps (eds), The Ecology and Management of Aquatic terrestrial Ecotones. Man and the Biosphere Series, Vol. 4, pp. 199–225. UNESCO and the Parthenon Publishing Group. Park Ridge, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, N.D., McMahon, T.A. and Finlayson, B.L. 1992. Stream Hydrology – An Introduction for Stream Ecologies. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  16. hart, B.T., Bailey, P., Edwards, R., Hortle, K., James, K., McMahon, A., Meredith, C. and Swadling, K. 1990. Effects of salinity on river, stream and wetland ecosystems in Victoria, Australia. Wat. Res. 24: 1103–1117.Google Scholar
  17. Hatton T. and Salama R. 1999. Is it feasible to restore the salinity-affected rivers of the Western Australian wheatbelt? Proceedings of the Second Australian Stream Management Conference, Adelaide, 8–11 February 1999. I.D. Rutherfurd and R. Bartley (eds). pp. 313–317.Google Scholar
  18. Horwitz, P. 1997. Comparative endemism and richness of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in peatlands and shrublands of far south-western Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56: 313–322.Google Scholar
  19. Kellerhals, R., and Bray, D.I. 1971. Sampling procedures for coarse fluvial sediments. J. Hydraul. Div. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 97: 1165–1180.Google Scholar
  20. McComb, A.J. and Davis, J.A. 1993. Eutrophic waters of southwestern Australia. Fertilizer Research 36: 105–114.Google Scholar
  21. Metzler, G.M. and Smock, L.A. 1990. Storage and dynamics of subsurface detritus in a sandbottomed stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47: 588–594.Google Scholar
  22. Morrissy, N.M. 1974. Reversed longitudinal salinity profile of a major river in the south-west of Western Austrlai. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 25: 327–335.Google Scholar
  23. O'Brien, A.K., Eshleman, K.N. and Pollard, J.S. 1994. Interactions between groundwater and surface water in a Virginia coastal plain watershed. 2. Acid-base chemistry. Hydrological Processes 8: 411–427.Google Scholar
  24. Pugsley, C.W. and Hynes, H.B.N. 1983. A modified freeze-core technique to quantify the depth distribution of fauna in stony streambeds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40: 637–643.Google Scholar
  25. Salama, R.B., Farrington, P., Bartle, G.A. and Watson, G.D. 1993. The role of geological structures and relict channels in the development of dryland salinity in the wheatbelt of Western Australia. Aust. J. Earth Sciences, 40: 45–56.Google Scholar
  26. Salama, R.B. and Bartle, G.A. 1998. Comparative study of streamflow and salt load from selected catchment in the wheatbelt of Western Australia. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report No 23.Google Scholar
  27. Schofield, N.J. 1990. Water interactions with land use and climate in south western Australia. Western Australian Water Authority Report No. WS60, Perth.Google Scholar
  28. Schofield et al. 1988.Google Scholar
  29. Schofield, N.J. and Ruprecht, J.K. 1989. Regional analysis of stream salinisation in southwest Western Australia. J. hydrol. 112: 19–39.Google Scholar
  30. Steering Committee for Research on Land Use and Water Supply. 1989. Stream salinity and its reclamation in south-west Western Australia. Water Authority of Western Australia, Water Resources Directorate Report, No. WS 52, Perth.Google Scholar
  31. Sutherland 1996Google Scholar
  32. Thibodeaux, L.J., Boyle, J.D. 1987. Bed form generated convective transport in bottom sediment. Nature 325: 341–343.Google Scholar
  33. Trayler, K. and Davis, J.A. 1998. Forestry impacts and the vertical distribution of stream invertebrates in south-western Austrlia. Freshwater Biology 40: 331–342.Google Scholar
  34. Valett, H.M., Fisher, S.G. and Stanley, E.H. 1990. Physical and chemical characteristics of the hyporheic zone of a Sonoran Desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9: 201–215.Google Scholar
  35. Valett, H.M., Fisher, S.G., Grimm, N.B. and Camill, P. 1994. Vertical hydrologic exchange and ecological stability of a desert stream ecosystem. Ecology 75: 548–560.Google Scholar
  36. Valett, H.M., Dahm, C.N., Campana, M.E., Morrice, J.A., Baker, M.A. and Fellows, C.S. 1997. Hydrologic influences on groundwater-surface water ecotones: heterogenity in nutrient composition and retention. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16: 239–247.Google Scholar
  37. White D.S. 1993. Perspectives on defining and delineating hyporheic zones. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12, 61–69.Google Scholar
  38. Whitman, R.L., Clark, W.J. 1982. Availiability of dissolved oxygen in interstitial waters of a sandy creek. Hydrobiologia 92: 651–658.Google Scholar
  39. Williams 1996.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, W.D. 1987. Salinization of rivers and streams: an important environmental hazard. Ambio 16: 180–185.Google Scholar
  41. Yu, B. and Neil, D.T. 1993. Salinity trend of the Williams River, Western Australia, J. Roy. Soc. WA 76: 71–76.Google Scholar
  42. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.J. Boulton
    • 1
  • P. Marmonier
    • 2
  • J.A. Davis
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandNew South WalesAustralia
  2. 2.UMR-CNRS 6553 `ECOBIO', Station Biologique de PaimpontUniversité de Rennes 1PaimpontFrance
  3. 3.School of Biological and Environmental SciencesMurdoch UniversityMurdochWestern Australia

Personalised recommendations