Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 71–84 | Cite as

Psychiatry and Postmodern Theory

  • Bradley Lewis


Psychiatry, as a subspecialty of medicine, is a quintessentially modernist project. Yet across the main campus, throughout the humanities and social sciences, there is increasing postmodern consensus that modernism is a deeply flawed project. Psychiatry, the closest of the medical specialties to the humanities and social sciences, will be the first to encounter postmodern theory. From my reading, psychiatry, though likely defensive at first, will eventually emerge from a postmodern critique, not only intact, but rejuvenated. Postmodern theory, at its best, provides a liberating effect on modernist practices, freeing them from an enslavement to Method and Objectivity in order to allow the more human (all charges of “antihumanism” not withstanding) to emerge as valued and respected. The net result could be the evolution of a new postmodern psychiatry and a new model of medicine which would be much more enjoyable to practice and much more connected to the concerns of patients.


Social Science Medical Specialty Main Campus Modernist Practice Modernist Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barthes, R. (1982). Inaugural lecture, College de France. In S. Sontag (Ed.), A Barthes Reader, (pp. 457–478). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena (D. Allison, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (1974). Of gramatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Docherty, J., & Streeter, M. (1993). Progress and limitations in psychotherapy research. Journal of Psychotherapy Research and Practice, 2(2), 100–119.Google Scholar
  5. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge (pp. 109–133). NewYork: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  6. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1995). The philosophical discourse of modernity (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kant, I. (1995). What is enlightenment? In I. Kramnick (Ed.), The Portable Enlightenment Reader (pp. 7–16). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  11. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge Volume 10 (G. Bennington, & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pellegrino, E. (1979). Humanism and the physician. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rorty, R. (1982). The consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). (3rd ed.). NewYork: MacMillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bradley Lewis
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations