Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 73–92 | Cite as

Approach and Avoidance Motivation

  • Andrew J. Elliot
  • Martin V. Covington


In this article, we introduce this special issue by establishing a conceptual foundation for the distinction between approach and avoidance motivation. We do so primarily by explicating several reasons why the approach–avoidance distinction should be viewed as fundamental and basic to the study of human behavior. In addition, we compare and contrast the “approach–avoidance” designation with other designations that have been used in the motivational literature to cover the same or similar conceptual ground. Finally, we conclude by briefly overviewing the other contributions to this special issue, specifically highlighting how they make use of the approach–avoidance distinction.

approach–avoidance appetitive aversive motivation valence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adamec, R. (1991). Anxious personality in the cat. In Carroll, B. and Barrett, J. (eds.), Psychopathology and the Brain, Raven Press, New York, pp. 153–168.Google Scholar
  2. Armitage, K. (1986). Individuality, social behavior, and reproductive success in yellow-bellied marmots. Ecology 67: 1186–1193.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, M. (1960). Emotion and Personality, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, J. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Bargh, (1997).The automaticity of everyday life. In R. Wyer (ed.), TheAutomaticity of Everyday Life: Advances in Social Cognition, LEA, Mahwah, NJ, Vol. 10, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
  6. Bargh, J., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P., and Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 32: 104–128.Google Scholar
  7. Bargh, J., and Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. Am. Psychologist 54: 462–479.Google Scholar
  8. Bentham, J. (1779/1879). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Berntson, G., Boysen, S., and Cacioppo, J. (1993). Neurobehavioral organization and the cardinal principle of evaluative bivalence. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 702: 75–102.Google Scholar
  10. Berridge, K. (1999). Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: Hidden core processes of emotion. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.),Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 525–557.Google Scholar
  11. Bogardus, E. (1931). Fundamentals of Social Psychology (2nd Ed.), Century, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Bradley, M., and Vrana, S. (1993). The startle probe in the study of emotion and emotional disorders. In Birbaumer, N., and Ohman, A. (eds.), The Structure of Emotion, Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, pp. 270–287.Google Scholar
  14. Budaev, S. (1997). “Personality” in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). J. Comp. Psychol. 111: 399–411.Google Scholar
  15. Cacioppo, J., Crites, S., and Gardner, W. (1996). Attitudes to the right: Evaluative processing is associated with lateralized late positive event-related brain potentials. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22: 1205–1219.Google Scholar
  16. Cacioppo, J., Gardner, W., and Berntson, G. (1999).The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 76: 839–855.Google Scholar
  17. Cacioppo, J., Priester, J., and Bernston, G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes, II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 65: 5–16.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, M., and Bargh, J. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25: 215–223.Google Scholar
  19. Cloninger, C. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 44: 573–588.Google Scholar
  20. Cofer, C., and Appley, M. (1964). Motivation: Theory and Research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  21. Corwin, G. (1921). Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of cornell university. Am. J. Psychol. 32: 563–570.Google Scholar
  22. Covington, M. (1992). Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Covington, M., and Roberts, B. (1995). Self-worth and college achievement: Motivational and personality correlates. In Pintrich, P., Brown, D., and Weinstein, C. (eds.), Student Motivation, Cognition, and Learning, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 157–187.Google Scholar
  24. Craig, W. (1918). Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts. Biol. Bull. 34: 91–107.Google Scholar
  25. Crites, S., and Cacioppo, J. (1996). Electrocortical differentiation of evaluative and nonevaluative categorizations. Psychol. Sci. 7: 318–321.Google Scholar
  26. Davidson, R. (1992). Prolegomenon to the structure of emotion: Gleanings from neuropsychology. Cog. Emot. 6: 245–268.Google Scholar
  27. Davidson, R. (1993). Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Neuropsychol. 7: 464–475.Google Scholar
  28. Davidson, R. (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In Davidson, R., and Hugdahl, K. (eds.), Brain Asymmetry, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 362–387.Google Scholar
  29. Davidson, R., Ekman, P., Saron, C., Senulis, J., and Friesen, W. (1990). Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 58: 330–341.Google Scholar
  30. Davidson, R., and Fox, N. (1989). Frontal brain asymmetry predicts infants' response to maternal separation. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 98: 127–131.Google Scholar
  31. DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Delgado, J., Roberts, W., and Miller, N. (1954). Learning motivated by electrical stimulation of the brain. Am. J. Physiol. 179: 587–593.Google Scholar
  33. Depue, R., and Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behav. Brain Sci. 22: 491–569.Google Scholar
  34. Dethier, V., and Stellar, E. (1970). Acellular conducting systems. Animal Behav.3: 6–9.Google Scholar
  35. Dickinson, A., and Dearing, M. (1979). Appetitive-aversive interactions and inhibitory processes. In Dickinson, A., and Boakes, R. (eds.), Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 203–231.Google Scholar
  36. Dollard, J., and Miller, N. (1950). Personality and Psychotherapy, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Doob, L. (1947). The behavior of attitudes. Psychol. Rev. 54: 135–156.Google Scholar
  38. Elliot, A. (1997). Integrating the ‘classic’ and ‘contemporary’ approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In Maehr, M., and Pintrich, P. (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement Vol. 10, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 143–179.Google Scholar
  39. Elliot, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educ. Psychol. 34: 169–189.Google Scholar
  40. Elliot, A., and Church, M. (1997).Ahierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Person. Soc. Psychol.72: 218–232.Google Scholar
  41. Eysenck, H. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  42. Fiske, S. (1982). Schema-triggered affect. In Clark, M., and Fiske, S. (eds.), Affect and Cognition, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  43. Fordyce, G., Goddard, M., and Seifert, G. (1982). The measurement of temperament in cattle and the effect of experience and genotype. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14: 329–332.Google Scholar
  44. Forster, J., Higgins, E., and Idson, L. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the ‘goal looms larger’ effect (1998). J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 75: 1115–1131.Google Scholar
  45. Franken, R. (1994). Human Motivation, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  46. Freud, S. (1915). Repression. In the standard edition of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV, Hogarth, London, 1957.Google Scholar
  47. Frijda, N. (1986). The Emotions, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  48. Garcia-Sevilla, L. (1984). Extraversion and neuroticism in rats. Person. Indiv. Diff. 5: 511–532.Google Scholar
  49. Goddard, M., and Beilharz, R. (1985). A multivariate analysis of the fearfulness potential in potential guide dogs. Behav. Gen. 15: 69–89.Google Scholar
  50. Gosling, J. (1969). Pleasure and Desire: The Case for Hedonism Reviewed, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  51. Graham, F. (1973). Habituation and dishabituation of responses innervated by the autonomic nervous system. In Peeke, H., and Herz, M. (eds.), Habituation: Vol. 1. Behavioral Studies Academic Press, New York, pp. 163–218.Google Scholar
  52. Gray, J. (1982). The Neuropsychology of Anxiety, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, JohnWiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Herzog, H. A., Jr., and Burghardt, G. M. (1988). Development of antipredator responses in snakes. Ethology 77: 250–258.Google Scholar
  55. Hoebel, B., Rada, P., Mark, G., and Pothos, E. (1999). Neural systems of reinforcement and inhibition of behavior: Relevance to eating, addiction, and depression. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.). Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 558–574.Google Scholar
  56. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of Behavior, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Ito, T., and Cacioppo, J. (1999). The psychophysiology of utility appraisals. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 470–488.Google Scholar
  58. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. II), Henry Holt & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  59. Jung, C. (1921). Psychological types. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 6, Princeton University Press, 1971, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  60. Kagan, J. (1998). Biology and the child. In Eisenberg, N. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, JohnWiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (1999). Preface. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. ix–xii.Google Scholar
  62. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Approach, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  63. Kuhl, J. (1986). Motivation and information processing. In Sorrentino, R., and Higgins, E. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Vol. 1, Guilford, New York, pp. 404–434.Google Scholar
  64. Lang, P. (1984). Cognition in emotion: Concept and action. In Izard, C., Kagan, J., and Zajonc, R. (eds.), Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 196–226.Google Scholar
  65. Lang, P. (1995). Studies of motivation and attention. Am. Psychol. 50: 372–385.Google Scholar
  66. Lang, P., Bradley, M., and Cuthbert, B. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychol. Rev. 97: 377–395.Google Scholar
  67. Lang, P., Bradley, M., and Cuthbert, B. (1992). A motivational analysis of emotion: Reflexcortex connections (1992). Am. Psychol. Soc. 3: 44–49.Google Scholar
  68. Lang, P., Bradley, M., and Cuthbert, B. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In Lang, P., Simmons, R., and Balaban, M. (eds.), Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Florida, pp. 87–135.Google Scholar
  69. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and Adaption, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  70. LeDoux, J. (1987). Emotion. In Plum, F. (ed.), Handbook of Physiology, Vol. 5, American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, pp. 419–454.Google Scholar
  71. LeDoux, J. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 46: 209–235.Google Scholar
  72. LeDoux, J., Sakaguchi, A., and Reis, H. (1984). Subcortical efferent projections of the medial geniculate nucleus mediate emotional responses conditioned by acoustic stimuli. J. Neurosci. 4: 683–698.Google Scholar
  73. Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition:Asocial-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bull. 126: 109–137.Google Scholar
  75. Lyons, D., Price, E., and Moberg, G. (1988). Individual differences in temperament of domestic dairy goats: Constancy and change. Anim. Behav. 36: 1323–1333.Google Scholar
  76. MacDonald, K. (1983). Stability and individual differences in behavior in a litter of wolf cubs (canis lupus). J. Comp. Psychol. 97: 107–119.Google Scholar
  77. Maier, S., Vandenhoff, P., and Crowne, D. (1988). Multivariate analysis of putative measures of activity, exploration, emotionality, and spatial behavior in the hooded rat (rattus norvegicus). J. Comp. Psychol. 102: 378–387.Google Scholar
  78. Maslow, A. (1955). Deficiency motivation and growth motivation. In Jones, M. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  79. Mather, J., and Anderson, R. (1993). Personalities of octopuses (octopus robescens). J. Comp. Psychol. 107: 336–340.Google Scholar
  80. McClelland, D. (1951). Personality, The Dryden Press, New York.Google Scholar
  81. McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R., and Lowell, E. (1953). The Achievement Motive, Irvington Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  82. Miller, N. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In McV. Hunt, J. (ed.), Personality and the Behavioral Disorders, Vol. 1, Ronald Press, New York, pp. 431–465.Google Scholar
  83. Mowrer, O. (1960). Learning Theory and Behavior, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in Personality, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  85. Murphy, S., and Zajonc, R. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 64: 723–739.Google Scholar
  86. Ohman, A. (1997). As fast as the blink of an eye: Evolutionary preparedness for preattentive processing of threat. In Lang, P., Simmons, R., and Balaban, M. (eds.), Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Florida, pp. 87–135.Google Scholar
  87. Olds, J., and Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47: 419–427.Google Scholar
  88. Orians, G., and Heerwagen, J. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 555–579.Google Scholar
  89. Osgood, C., Suci, G., and Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  90. Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation into the Physiological Activity of the Cortex (G. Anrep, trans.), Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Pintrich, P., and Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  92. Reeve, J. (1992). Understanding Motivation and Emotion, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando.Google Scholar
  93. Rotter, J. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,NJ.Google Scholar
  94. Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaption and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 109–133.Google Scholar
  95. Schneirla, T. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
  96. Schneirla, T. (1965). Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavioral development. Adv. Study Behav. 1: 1–74.Google Scholar
  97. Shizgal, P. (1999). On the neural compution of utility: Implications from studies of brain stimulation reward. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Wellbeing: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 500–524.Google Scholar
  98. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  99. Sokolov, E. (1963). Perception and the Conditioned Reflex, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  100. Solorz, A. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. J. Exp. Psychol. 59: 239–245.Google Scholar
  101. Stevenson-Hinde, J., Stillwell-Barnes, R., and Zunz, M. (1980). Individual differences in young rhesus monkeys: Continuity and change. Primates 21: 498–509.Google Scholar
  102. Suomi, S. (1983). Social development in rhesus monkeys: Consideration of individuals differences. In Oliverio, A., and Zappella, M. (eds.), The Behavior of Human Infants, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 71–92.Google Scholar
  103. Thiroux, J. (1985). Philosophy: Theory and Practice, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  104. Thorndike, E. (1911). Animal Intelligence, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  105. Tolman, E. (1925). Behaviorism and purpose. J. Philosophy 22: 35–41.Google Scholar
  106. Tolman, E. (1932). Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men, The Century, New York.Google Scholar
  107. Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptions and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethol. Sociobiol. 11: 375–424.Google Scholar
  108. Verbeek, M., Drent, P., and Wiepkema, P. (1994). Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behavior of male great tits. Anim. Behav. 48: 1113–1121.Google Scholar
  109. Watson, S., and Ward, J. (1996). Temperment and problem solving in the small-eared bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii). J. Comp. Psychol. 110: 377–385.Google Scholar
  110. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., and Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. J. Personal. Social. Psychol. 76: 820–838.Google Scholar
  111. Wilson, D., Clark, A., Coleman, K., and Dearstyne, T. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 442–446.Google Scholar
  112. Wilson, D., Coleman, K., Clark, A., and Biederman, L. (1993). Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. J. Comp. Psychol. 107: 250–260.Google Scholar
  113. Young, P. (1936). Motivation of Behavior: The Fundamental Determinants ofHumanand Animal Activity,Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  114. Young, P. (1941). The experimental analysis of appetite. Psychol. Bull. 38: 129–164.Google Scholar
  115. Young, P. (1949). Food-seeking drive, affective process, and learning. Psychol. Rev. 56: 98–121.Google Scholar
  116. Young, P. (1959). The role of affective processes in learning and motivation, Psychol. Rev. 66: 104–125.Google Scholar
  117. Zajonc, R. (1984). On the primacy of affect. Am. Psychol. 39: 117–123.Google Scholar
  118. Zajonc, R. (1998). Emotion. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 591–632.Google Scholar
  119. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Psychobiology of Personality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Elliot
    • 1
  • Martin V. Covington
    • 2
  1. 1.University of RochesterRochester
  2. 2.University of California—BerkeleyBerkeley

Personalised recommendations