Quality of Life Research

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 961–972

Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: A health-related quality of life instrument for 1–5-year-old children

  • M. Fekkes
  • N.C.M. Theunissen
  • E. Brugman
  • S. Veen
  • E.G.H. Verrips
  • H.M. Koopman
  • T. Vogels
  • J.M. Wit
  • S.P. Verloove-Vanhorick
Article

Abstract

The 43-item TNO-AZL Preschool Children Quality of Life (TAPQOL) questionnaire was developed to meet the need for a reliable and valid instrument for measuring parent's perceptions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in preschool children. HRQoL was defined as health status in 12 domains weighted by the impact of the health status problems on well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric performance of the TAPQOL. A sample of 121 parents of preterm children completed the TAPQOL questionnaire (response rate 88%) as well as 362 parents of children from the general population (response rate 60%). On the base of Cronbach's α, item-rest correlation, and principal component analysis, the TAPQOL scales were constructed from the data for the preterm children sample. The psychometric performance of these scales was evaluated for both the preterm children sample and the general population sample. Cronbach's α ranged from 0.66 to 0.88 for the preterm children sample and from 0.43 to 0.84 for the general population sample. The unidimensionality of the separate scales was confirmed by principal component analysis for both the preterm children sample and the general population sample. Spearman's correlation coefficients between scales were, on average, low. T-tests showed that the very preterm children, the children with chronic diseases, the less healthy and the less happy children had lower mean scores on the TAPQOL scales than healthy children, indicating a worse quality of life. This study shows that the TAPQOL is a reliable and valid parent's perception of HRQoL in preschool children. More research is needed to evaluate the psychometric performance of the TAPQOL in different clinical populations.

Health-related quality of life Preschool children Preterm birth Quality of life instruments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis CC, Pantell RH, Kieckefer GM. Assessment of children's health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S54–S65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stein REK, Jessop DJ. Functional Status II(R). A measure of child health status. Med Care 1990; 28: 1041–1055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vivier PM, Bernier JA, Starfield B. Current approaches to measuring health outcomes in pediatric research. Current Opinion Pediatr 1994; 6: 530–537.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisen M, Ware JE, Donald CA, Brook RH. Measuring components of children's health status. Med Care 1979; 9: 902–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aaronson NK. Quality of life: What is it? How should it be measured? Oncology 1988; 2: 69–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Ap-plications and issues in assessment. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1074–1077.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weissman MM, Orvaschel H, Padian N. Children's symp-tom and social functioning self-report scales: Comparison of mothers' and children's reports. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980; 168: 7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with a chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 743–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hebert R, Bravo G, Korner-Bitensky N, Voyer L. Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49(3): 373–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glazer AW, Davies K, Walker D, Brazier D. Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 43–53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whiteman D, Green A. Wherein lies the truth? Assessment of agreement between parent proxy and child respondents. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 26(4): 855–859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellman MH, Paley C. Pain control in children. Parents underestimate children's pain. Br Med J 1993; 307: 1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hays RD, Vickrey BG, Hermann BP, et al. Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life in epilepsy patients. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 159–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cantwell DP, Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Relly J R. Correspondence between adolescent report and parent report of psychiatric diagnostic data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36(5): 610–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 619–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christie MJ, French D, Weatherstone L, West A. The patients' perception of chronic disease and its management: Psychosomatics, holism and quality of life in contemporary management of childhood asthma. Psychother Psychosomatics 1991; 56: 197–203.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collins JA. Epilepsie and well-being. Social Sci Med 1990; 31: 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(12): 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Post MWM, Kuyvenhoven MM, Verheij TJM, et al. The Dutch version of the Functional Status II(R): A generic questionnaire measuring functional health status of chil-dren. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1998; 142(49): 2675–2679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Stoskopf B, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the health status of extremely low birthweight children at eight years of age: Comparison with a reference group. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 411–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saigal S, Feeny D, Furlong W, et al. Comparison of the health-related quality of life of extremely low birthweight children and a reference group of children at age eight years. J Pediatr 1994; 125: 418–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veen S, Ens-Dokkum MH, Schreuder AM, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Brand R, Ruys JH. Impairments, disabili ties, and handicaps of very preterm and very-low-birth-weight infants at five years of age in the Netherlands. The Lancet 1991; 338: 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aaronson NK. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methodological issues. Controlled Clin Trials 1989; 10: S195–S208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Langfitt JT. Comparison of the psychometric characteris-tics of three quality of life measures in intractable epilepsy. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 101–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Apajaselo M, Sintonen H, Holmberg, et al. Quality of life in early adolescence: A sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Research 1996; 5: 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Verrips GH, Vogels AGC, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. Health-related quality of life measure for children - The TACQOL. J Appl Therap 1997; 1: 357–360.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Theunissen NCM, Vogels AGC, Koopman HM, et al. The proxy problem: Child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vogels T, Verrips GHW, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in children. The development of the TACQOL-Parent form. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 387–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bayley N. Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edn. San Antonio, Texas, USA: Psychological Corporation 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Fekkes
    • 1
  • N.C.M. Theunissen
    • 2
  • E. Brugman
    • 1
  • S. Veen
    • 2
  • E.G.H. Verrips
    • 1
  • H.M. Koopman
    • 2
  • T. Vogels
    • 1
  • J.M. Wit
    • 2
  • S.P. Verloove-Vanhorick
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Child Health Division, TNO Prevention and HealthNetherlands
  2. 2.Department of PaediatricsLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations