Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 8, Issue 9, pp 1245–1259

Geographic distribution of tree species occurring in the region of Manaus, Brazil: implications for regional diversity and conservation

  • Alexandre A. De Oliveira
  • Douglas C. Daly
Article

Abstract

The alpha-diversity of trees found in the region of Manaus, Brazil is among the highest recorded for one-hectare plots in Amazonia or any tropical forest. Based on a survey of the distributions of 2541 Neotropical tree species, we analyzed the geographic distribution of 364 species of terra firme forest trees that occur in the region and that are not edaphic specialists. Fifteen distinct distribution patterns were recognized for trees occurring in Manaus. The great majority of species (84.9%) have continuous, somewhat restricted distributions, 35 (9.6%) show broad distributions and 20 species (5.5%) show disjunction between Amazonia and Eastern Brazil. A remarkable 150 (41.2%) of these species showed the region of Manaus as one of their distribution limits. Using the same pool of 2541 species distributions, the percentage of species with a distribution limit in Manaus was compared with that for other localities known to be centers of botanical collection. The null hypothesis that the difference in proportion of species with distribution limits among these localities and Manaus is insignificant was rejected. We conclude that the results are not an artifact of collecting density, that Manaus is indeed a crossroads of distinct phytogeographic regions, and that this explains part of the high species diversity of trees in the region of Manaus. A number of scenarios proposed for the Pleistocene in Amazonia postulate some degree of fragmentation of Amazonian forests or at least populations. As much as these theories may conflict with each other in some respects, they are compatible with the concept of Manaus as a region of re-convergence of isolated or disrupted floras and faunas. The significance of the vicinity of Manaus in the history of the Amazon flora and its current status as a repository for surprisingly high tree diversity highlights the need to make this region a conservation priority.

alpha-diversity Amazonia conservation distribution patterns phytogeography Pleistocene refuge theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrade-Lima D (1966) Contribuição ao estudo do paralelismo da flora amazônica-nordestina. Boletim Técnico do Instituto de Pesquisa Agronômica de Pernambuco 19: 1–30Google Scholar
  2. Andrade-Lima D (1977) Preservation of the flora of northeastern Brazil. In: Prance GT and Elias TS (eds) Extinction is Forever, pp 234–239. The New York Botanical Garden Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade-Lima D (1981) Present-day forest refuges in northeastern Brazil. In: Prance GT (ed) Biological Diversification in the Tropics, pp 245–253. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. AraÚjo VC (1970) Fenologia de essências florestais amazônicas. I. Boletim do INPA 4: 1–25Google Scholar
  5. Bigarella JJ, Andrade-Lima D and Riehs PJ (1975) ConsideraçÕes a respeito das mudanças paleoambientais na distribuição de algumas espécies vegetais e animais no Brasil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 47 (suppl.): 411–464Google Scholar
  6. Boom BM and Campos MTVA (1991) A preliminary account of the Rubiaceae of a Central Amazonian terra firme forest. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Série Botânica 7(2): 223–247Google Scholar
  7. Brown JH and Gibson AC (1983) Biogeography. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  8. Bush MB 1994. Amazonian speciation: a necessarily complex model. Journal of Biogeography 21: 5–17Google Scholar
  9. Campbell KE Jr (1990) The geological basis of biogeographic patterns in Amazonia. In: Peters G and Hutterer R (eds) Vertebrates in the Tropics, pp 33–43. Museum Alexander Koenig, BonnGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell KE Jr and Frailey CD (1984) Holocene flooding and species diversity in southwestern Amazonia. Quaternary Research 21: 369–375Google Scholar
  11. Clinebell II RR, Phillips OL, Gentry AH, Stark N and Zuuring H (1995) Prediction of neotropical tree and liana species richness from soil and climatic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 56–90Google Scholar
  12. Colinvaux PA, De Oliveira PE, Moreno JE, Miller MC and Bush MB (1996) A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times. Science 274: 85–88Google Scholar
  13. Cracraft J (1985) Historical biogeography and patterns of differentiaion within the South American avifauna: Areas of endemism. Ornithological Monographs 36: 49–84Google Scholar
  14. Cracraft J and Prum RO (1988) Patterns and processes of diversification: speciation and historical congruence in some Neotropical birds. Evolution 42(3): 603–620Google Scholar
  15. Daly DC and Prance GT (1989) Brazilian Amazon. In: Campbell DG and Hammond HD (eds) Floristic Inventory of Tropical Countries, pp 401–426. New York Botanical Garden, BronxGoogle Scholar
  16. Ducke A and Black GA (1953) Phytogeographycal notes on the Brazilian Amazonia. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 25(1): 1–46Google Scholar
  17. EMBRAPA (1981) Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação de Solos. Mapa de Solos do Brasil. Escala, 1:5.000.000. (EMBRAPA. SNLCS. 1 mapa). Rio de Janeiro, 1981Google Scholar
  18. Emmons LH (1997) Neotropical Rainforest Mammals. Second Edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford SM (1994) Taxonomy and distribution of the owl monkey. In: Baer J, Weller RE and Kakoma I (eds) Aotus: The Owl Monkey, pp 1–59. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Frailey CD, Lavina EL, Rancy A and Filho JPS (1988) A proposed Pleistocene/Holocene lake in the Amazon basin and its significance to Amazonian geology and biogeography. Acta Amazonica 18(3–4): 119–143Google Scholar
  21. Gentry AH (1988) Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75(1): 1–34Google Scholar
  22. Granville JJ de (1992) Un cas de distribution particulier: les espèces forestières peri-amazoniennes. Compte Rendu des Séances de la Société de Biogéographie 68(1): 1–33Google Scholar
  23. Haffer J (1969) Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165: 131–137Google Scholar
  24. Haffer J (1997a) Alternative models of vertebrate speciation in Amazonia: an overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 451–476Google Scholar
  25. Haffer J (1997b) Contact zones between birds of southern Amazonia. In: Remsen JV Jr (ed) Studies in Neotropical Ornithology Honoring Ted Parker, pp 281–306. Ornithological Monographs No. 48. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Hueck K (1966) Die Wälder Südamerikas. Okologie, Zusammensetzung und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Vegetationsmonographien Bd II. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  27. IBGE (1991) Região Norte. Geografia do Brasil v. 3. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  28. Mori SA (1990) Diversificação e conservação das Lecythidaceae neotropicais. Acta Botanica Brasilica 67(2): 67–75Google Scholar
  29. Mori SA (1991) The Guyana Lowland Floristic Province. Compte Rendu des Séances de la Société de Biogéographie 67(2): 67–75Google Scholar
  30. Mori SA, Boom B and Prance GT (1981) Distribution patterns and conservation of eastern Brazilian coastal forest tree species. Brittonia 33(2): 233–245Google Scholar
  31. Nelson BW, Ferreira CAC, Silva MF, and Kawasaki ML (1990) Endemism centers, refugia and botanical collection density in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature 345: 714–716Google Scholar
  32. Oliveira AA de (1997) Diversidade, estrutura e dinâmica do componente arbóreo de uma floresta de terra firme de Manaus, Amazonas. Doctoral Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). São PauloGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira AA de and Mori SA (1999) A central Amazonian terra firme forest: I. high tree species richness on poor soils. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1205–1230 (this issue)Google Scholar
  34. Patton JL, Silva MNF, Lara MC and Mustrangi MA (1997) Diversity, differentiation, and the historical biogeography of nonvolant small mammals of the neotropical forests. In: Laurance WF and Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, pp 455–465. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips OL, Hall P, Gentry AH, Sawyer SA and Vásquez R (1994) Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Science of the USA 91: 2805–2809Google Scholar
  36. Pires JM (1984) The Amazonian Forest. In: Sioli H (ed) The Amazon – Limnology and Landscape Ecology of a Mighty Tropical River and Its Basin, pp 581–602. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  37. Prado DE and Gibbs PE (1993) Patterns of species distributions in the dry seasonal forests of South America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 902–928Google Scholar
  38. Prance GT (1973) Phytogeographic support for the theory of Pleistocene forest refuges in the Amazon basin, based on evidence from distribution patterns in Caryocaraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Dichapetalaceae and Lecythidaceae. Acta Amazonica 3(1): 5–28Google Scholar
  39. Prance GT (1977) The phytogeographic divisions of Amazonia and their influence on the selection of biological reserves. In: Prance GT and Elias TS (eds) Extinction is Forever, pp 195–213. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NYGoogle Scholar
  40. Prance GT (1982) A review of the phytogeographic evidences for Pleistocene climate changes in the neotropics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 69: 594–624Google Scholar
  41. Prance GT (1988) Padrão de distribuição e especiação em Chrysobalanaceae e outras famílias de plantas amazônicas. Acta Botanica Brasilica 1(2): 1–25Google Scholar
  42. Prance GT (1994a) The use of phytogeographic data for conservation planning. In: Forey PL, Humphries CJ and Vane-Wright RI (eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation, pp 145–163. Systematic Association Special Vol. 50. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Prance GT (1994b) A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species number in the assessment of biodiversity in the neotropics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 345: 89–99Google Scholar
  44. Prance GT, Rodrigues WA and Silva MF (1976) Inventário florístico de um hectare de mata de terra firme km 30 da Estrada Manaus-Itacoatiara. Acta Amazonica 6(1): 9–35Google Scholar
  45. Rizzini CT (1963) Nota prévia sobre a divisão fitogeográfica do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geografia 25(1): 1–64Google Scholar
  46. Rizzini CT (1979) Tratado de fitogeografia do Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Universidade de São PauloGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodrigues WA (1979) Indices das espécies e assuntos contido em 'Notas sobre a Fitogeografia daAmazônia Brasileira' de Ducke & Black (1954). Acta Amazonica. 9(3): 437–462Google Scholar
  48. Salo J, Kalliola R, Hakkinen I, Makinen Y, Nimela P, Puhakka M and Coley PD (1986) River dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forest. Nature 322: 254–258Google Scholar
  49. Sampaio A (1945) Fitogeografia do Brasil. Compania Editora Nacional, São Paulo Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (1997) The role of ecological knowledge in explaining biogeography and biodiversity in Amazonia. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 347–357Google Scholar
  51. Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K and Salo J (1992) Lago Amazonas: fact or fancy? Acta Amazonica 22(3): 353–361Google Scholar
  52. Vanzolini PE (1970) Zoologia sistemática geográfica e a origem das espécies. Inst. Geográfico São Paulo Série Teses e Monografias 3: 1–56Google Scholar
  53. Vuilleumier BS (1971) Pleistocene changes in the fauna and flora of South America. Science 1973: 771–779Google Scholar
  54. Wetterberg GB, Prance GT and Lovejoy TE (1981) Conservation progress in Amazonia: a structural review. Parks 6(2): 5–10Google Scholar
  55. Wolfheim JH (1983) Primates of the World: Distribution, Abundance, and Conservation. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre A. De Oliveira
    • 1
  • Douglas C. Daly
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidade Paulista – UNIP. Lab. Botânica. Av. Paulista 900São Paulo-SPBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Systematic BotanyThe New York Botanical GardenBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations