Thermophilic fungi and applied research: a synopsis of name changes and synonymies

  • Jean Mouchacca
Article

Abstract

The present synopsis reports on taxonomic decisions and name changes introduced in the last decades for a number of thermophilic fungi. Taxa dealt with are those most commonly cited in the literature of fundamental and applied work or concern species having complex taxonomic histories. The definition of a thermophile follows the classificatory scheme elaborated by Cooney & Emerson in 1964. The synopsis provides the latest legal valid names for several thermophiles. Binomials of accepted synonymies are also reported with arguments in favour of these taxonomic decisions. The material of this contribution is a synthetic simplified account of two previous reviews on the taxonomy of thermophilic fungi. The present document aims: (1) to suppress the use of ghost binomials having no status of any kind; (2) to favour the continuous use of the latest legal valid name of a taxon to avoid cases of redundancies by citing binomials of known synonyms. Homogeneity in cited names is a fundamental prerequisite for comparative studies. The synopsis is thus a sound tool for future critical reviews of ecological and of biotechnological interests. The status of over a hundred names are here reviewed. Two additional new synonyms are proposed; these concern Mucor miehei var. minor and Sporotrichum cellulophilum.

Biotechnology ecology fungi nomenclature status synopsis taxonomy thermophile 

References

  1. Aa, H.A. van des 1973 In Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Baarn und Delft Progress Report (1972). Verhandelingen der Koninklÿke Nederlandse Akademie van Wefenschappen Agd. Nat-uurkunde Tweede Reeks 61, 60-81.Google Scholar
  2. Abdullah, S.K. & Al-Bader, S.M. 1990 On the thermophilic and thermotolerant mycoflora of Iraq. Sydowia 42, 1-7.Google Scholar
  3. Apinis, A.E. 1967 Dactylomyces and Thermoascus. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 30, 573-582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austwick, P.K.C. 1976 Environmental aspects of Mortierella wolfii infection in cattle. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 25-33.Google Scholar
  5. Basu, M. 1984 Myceliophthora indica is a new thermophilic species from India. Nova Hedwigia 40, 85-90.Google Scholar
  6. Brummitt, R.K. & Powell, C.E. 1992 Authors of plant names. pp. 732. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. ISBN 0-94764344-3.Google Scholar
  7. Canevascini, G. 1999 Cellulolytic thermophilic fungi. In Thermophilic Moulds in Biotechnology, eds. Johri, B.N., Satyanarayana, T. & Olsen, J., pp. 139-167. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0-79235957-7.Google Scholar
  8. Cooney, D.G. & Emerson, R. 1964 Thermophilic Fungi. An Account of their Biology, Activities and Classification. pp. 188. San Francisco & London: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  9. Durand, H., Soucaille, P.H. & Tiraby, G. 1984 Comparative studies of cellulases and hemicellulases from fungi: mesophiles Trichoderma reesii and Penicillium sp. and thermophiles Thielavia terrestris and Sporotrichum cellulophilum. Enzyme and Microbiol Technology 6, 175-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, M.B. 1971 Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. pp. 608. Surrey, England: CMI Kew. ISBN 0-85198251-4.Google Scholar
  11. Johri, B.N., Satyanarayana, T. & Olsen, J. (eds.) 1999 Thermophilic Moulds in Biotechnology. pp. 354. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0-79235957-7.Google Scholar
  12. Kinoshito, S., Chua, I.W., Yoshida, T. & Taguchi, H. 1986 Hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulases of Sporotrichum cellulophilum in an ultrafllter membrane reactor. Enzyme and Microbiol Technology 8, 691-695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Komura, I., Awao, T. & Yamada, K. 1978 United States Patent 4 106 989.Google Scholar
  14. Narain, R., Srivastava, R.B. & Mehrotra, B.S. 1983 A new thermophilic species of Scytalidium from India. Zentralblatt für Mikrobiologie 138, 569-572.Google Scholar
  15. Mirza, J.H., Khan, S.M., Begum, S. & Shagupta, S. 1979 Mucorales of Pakistan. Faisalabad, Pakistan: University of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  16. Mouchacca, J. 1997 Thermophilic fungi: biodiversity and taxonomic status. Cryptogamie, Mycologie 18, 19-69.Google Scholar
  17. Mouchacca, J. 1999 Thermophilic fungi: present taxonomic concepts. In Thermophilic Moulds in Biotechnology, eds. Johri, B.N., Satyanarayana, T. & Olsen. J., pp. 43-83. Dordrecht/Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0-79235957-7.Google Scholar
  18. Mouchacca, J. 2001 Thermotolerant fungi erroneously reported in applied research work as possessing thermophilic attributes. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 16, 869-880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Samson, R.A. 1974 Paecilomyces and some allied hyphomycetes. Studies in Mycology Baarn 6, 1-119.Google Scholar
  20. Schipper, M.A.A. 1978 On the genera Rhizomucor and Parasitella. Studies in Mycology Baarn 17, 53-71.Google Scholar
  21. Seifert, K.A., Samson, R.A., Boekhout, T. & Louis-Seize, G. 1997 Remersonia, a new genus for Stlbella thermophila, a thermophilic mould from compost. Canadian Journal of Botany 75, 1158-1165.Google Scholar
  22. Sigler, L., Aneja, K.R., Kumar, R., Maheshwari, R. & Shukla, R.V. 1998 New records from India and redescription of Corynascus thermophilus and its anamorph Myceliophthora thermophila. Mycotaxon 68, 185-192.Google Scholar
  23. Silva, D.M.W. & Hanlin, R.T. 1996 Chaetomidium heterotrichum from Venezuela, with a key to species and cladistic analysis of the genus. Mycoscience 37, 261-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sopp, J.O. 1912 Monographie der Pilzgruppe Penicillium mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der in Norwegen gefundenen Arten. Skrifter udgivne af Videnskabsselskabet i Christiania. Mathematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse, No. 11, i-vi + 208 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Stolk, A.C. & Samson, R.A. 1972 The genus Talaromyces. Studies on Talaromyces and related genera. II. Studies in Mycology Baarn 2, 1-65.Google Scholar
  26. Straatsma, G. & Samson, R.A. 1993 Taxonomy of Scytalidium thermophilum, an important thermophilic fungus in mushroom compost. Mycological Research 97, 321-328.Google Scholar
  27. Subrahmanyam, A. 1975 Studies on morphology, culture characters and biological activities of some thermophilic fungi. Ph.D. Thesis. Poona, India: Poona University.Google Scholar
  28. Subrahmanyam, A. 1981 Studies on Thermomycology. Mucor thermohyalospora sp. nov. Bibliotheca Mycologica 91, 421-423.Google Scholar
  29. Subrahmanyam, A. & Gopalkrishnan, K.S. 1984 Notes on thermophilic fungi. Indian Botanical Reporter. Prof. K.B. Deshpande Commemoration Volume: 33-36.Google Scholar
  30. Tansey, M.R. 1973 Isolation of thermophilic fungi from alligator nesting material. Mycologia 65, 594-601.Google Scholar
  31. Tansey, M.R. 1975 Isolation of thermophilic fungi from snuff. Applied Microbiologie 29, 128-129.Google Scholar
  32. Vagvolgyi, C., Vastag, M., Acs, K. & Papp, T. 1999 Rhizomucor tauricus: a questionable species of the genus. Mycological Research 103, 1318-1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weresub, L.K. & Leclair, P.M. 1973 On Papulaspora and bulbilliferous basidiomycetes Burgoa and Minimedusa. Canadian Journal of Botany 49, 2203-2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Mouchacca
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de CryptogamieMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleParisFrance

Personalised recommendations