Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 9, Issue 8, pp 1029–1044 | Cite as

Biodiversity and environmental values: in search of a universal earth ethic

  • Bryan G. Norton
Article

Abstract

While biodiversity protection has become a widely accepted goal of environmental protectionists, no such agreement exists regarding why it is important. Two, competing theories of natural value – here called ‘Economism’ and ‘Intrinsic Value Theory’ – are often cited to support the goal. Environmentalists, who have recently proposed the articulation of a universal ‘Earth Charter’ to express the shared values humans derive from nature, have cited both of these theories as support for biodivesity protection. Unfortunately these theories, which are expressed as polar opposites, do not work well together and the question arises: is there a shared value that humans place on nature? It is argued that these two value theories share four questionable assumptions: (1) a sharp distinction between ‘intrinsic’ and ‘instrumental’ value; (2) an entity orientation; (3) moral monism; and (4) placeless evaluation. If these four assumptions are denied, an alternative value system emerges which recognizes a continuum of ways humans value nature, values processes rather than only entities, is pluralistic, and values biodiversity in place. An alternative theory of value, which emphasizes protecting processes rather than protecting objects, and which values nature for the creativity of its processes, is proposed as a more attractive theory for expressing the universal values of nature that should motivate an Earth Charter and the goal of biodiversity protection.

biodiversity creativity social values value theories 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen TFH and Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EN (1996) Ecologies of the Heart. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson BO, Levin S, Maler KG, Perrings C and Pimentel D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268: 520–521Google Scholar
  4. Baxter W (1993) People or Penguins. In: Van DeVeer D and Pierce C (eds) The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, pp 303–307. Wadsworth, Belmont, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Callicott JB (1989) In Defense of the Land Ethic. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  6. Common M and Perrings C (1992) Towards an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecological Economics 6: 7–34Google Scholar
  7. Dewey J (1910) The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In: The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Earth Charter Drafting Committee. ‘The Earth Charter’. See website http://www.earthcharter.orgGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman AM (1994) The ethical basis of the economic view of the environment, In: Van DeVeer D and Pierce C (eds) The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, pp 307–315.Wadsworth, Belmont, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  10. Gadgil M and Berkes F (1991) Traditional resource management systems. Resource Management and Optimization 18: 127–141Google Scholar
  11. Gunderson LH, Holling CS and Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Holling CS (1977) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze PC (ed) Engineering within Ecological Constraints, pp 31–44. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee K (1993) Compass and Gyroscope. Island Press, Covelo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Leopold A (1949) A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Norton BG (1987) Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. Norton BG (1992) A new paradigm for environmental management. In: Costanza R, Norton B and Haskell B (eds) Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, pp 23–41. Island Press, Covelo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton BG (1996) Change, constancy, and creativity: the new ecology and some old problems. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 7: 49–70Google Scholar
  19. Norton BG (1999) Ecology and opportunity. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and Futurity, pp 118–150. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Norton B and Hannon B (1997) Environmental values: a place-based theory. Environmental Ethics 19: 227–245Google Scholar
  21. Norton B and Hannon B (1998) Democracy and sense of place values. In: Light A and Smith J (eds) Philosophy and Geography III: Philosophies of Place, pp 119–146. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  22. Norton B, Costanza R and Bishop R (1998) The evolution of preferences: why ‘sovereign’ preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it? Ecological Economics 24: 193–212Google Scholar
  23. Pimm S (1991) Balance of Nature? The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinchot G (1987) (reprint of 1947 edition). Breaking New Ground. Island Press, Covelo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  25. Prigogene I and Stengers I (1984) Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. Bantam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Regier HA and Kay JJ (1996) An heuristic model of transforamtions of the aquatic ecosystems of the great lakes-St. Lawrence river basin. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health 5: 3–21Google Scholar
  27. Rockefeller SC (1996) Global ethics, international law, and the earth charter. Earth Ethics 7: 1–7Google Scholar
  28. Rolston H III (1994) Conserving Natural Value. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Shiva V (1993) Development, ecology, and women. In: Van Deveer D and Pierce C (eds) The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, pp 281–288. Wadsworth, Belmont, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  30. Stone C (1988) Earth and Other Ethics. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive Management of Natural resources. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan G. Norton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public PolicyGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations