Preservice Primary Teachers' Thinking About Technology and Technology Education

  • Campbell J. McRobbie
  • Ian S. Ginns
  • Sarah J. Stein


It is apparent from previous research that primary school teachers have very limited or narrow perceptions of design and technology and such views may affect adversely their ability and confidence to teach the key learning area of design and technology in the classroom. Therefore, it is the task of technology teacher educators to provide experiences that will broaden preservice teachers' perceptions of technology and technology education. This paper reports an investigation, using an interpretive research methodology, of preservice primary teachers' prior perceptions of design and technology and changes in their perceptions of design and technology as a result of their engagement in independent technology projects. Students enrolled in a one-year postgraduate teacher education program were the participants in the study and the methods of data collection included the use of survey instruments, interviews, field notes and students' reflective journals. The results indicate that the independent projects broadened and deepened the students' understandings of technology as a process. The implications of the approach for the design of technology education courses for preservice and inservice teachers are discussed.

independent projects preservice teachers primary school design and technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberta Education: 1996, Elementary Science Program, Alberta Education, Alberta.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, V. & Walvoord, B.: 1990, "Conducting and Reporting Original Scientific Research: Anderson' Biology Class', in B. B. Walvoord & L. P. McCarthy (eds.), Thinking and Writing in College, National Council for Teachers of English, Urbana, IL, 177-227.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, V. & Walvoord, B.: 1993, January, "Format or ForMAZE? What Naturalistic Writing Protocol Research Reveals About How College Biology Students Conduct and Compose Original Research'. Paper presented at the AETS Conference, Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Academy of Science: 1994, "Primary Investigations-Teachers' Resource Book 5', Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Curriculum Corporation: 1994, A Statement on Technology for Australian Schools, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, VIC.Google Scholar
  6. Erickson, F.: 1998, "Qualitative Research Methods for Science Education', in B. J. Fraser & K. G Tobin (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (Part 2), Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Gardner, P. J., Penna, C. & Brass, K.: 1996, "Technology Education in the Postcompulsory Years', in P. J. Fensham (ed.), Science and Technology Education in the Postcompulsory Years, Australian Council of Educational Research, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Jarvis, T. & Rennie, L.: 1996, "Perceptions About Technology Held by Primary Teachers in England', Research in Science and Technological Education 14(1), 43-54.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, J. R.: 1989, Technology. Report of the Project 2061 Phase 1 Technology Panel, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, A. & Carr, M.: 1992, "Teachers' Perceptions of Technology Education: Implications for Curriculum Innovation', Research in Science Education 22, 230-239.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, A. & Carr, M.: 1993, Towards Technology Education (Vol. 1): Working Papers from the First Phase of the Learning in Technology Project, Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, A.: 1997, "Recent Research in Learning Technological Concepts and Processes', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7, 83-96.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, A. & Compton, V.: 1997, July, "Evaluation of a Teacher Development Model for Technology Education: Implications for Practice'. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  15. Martens, L. M.: 1992, "Inhibitors to Implementing a Problem Solving Approach to Teaching Elementary Science: Case Study of a Teacher in Change', School Science and Mathematics 92(3), 150-156.Google Scholar
  16. McCormick, R., Murphy, P., Hennessy, S. & Davidson, M.: 1996, April, "Research on Student Learning of Designing and Problem Solving in Technology Activity in Schools in England'. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. McRobbie, C. J. & Tobin, K.: 1995, "Restraints to Reform: The Congruence of Teacher and Student Actions in a Chemistry Classroom', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(4), 373-385.Google Scholar
  18. Mitcham, C.: 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Rngineering and Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. Rennie, L.: 1987, "Teachers' and Pupils' Perceptions of Technology and the Implications for the Curriculum', Research in Science and Technological Education 5(2), 121-133.Google Scholar
  20. Rennie, L. J. & Jarvis, T.: 1994, Helping Children Understand Technology, Department for Education and Children' Services, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  21. Rennie, L. & Jarvis, T.: 1995a, "English and Australian Children' Perceptions About Technology', Research in Science and Technological Education 13(2), 57-67.Google Scholar
  22. Rennie, L. & Jarvis, T.: 1995b, "Three Approaches to Measuring Children' Perceptions About Technology', International Journal of Science Education 17(6), 755-774.Google Scholar
  23. Roth, W.-M.: 1995, "From “Wiggly Structures” to “Unshaky Towers”: Problem Framing, Solution Finding, and Negotiation of Courses of Actions During a Civil Engineering Unit for Elementary Students', Research in Science Education 25(4), 365-381.Google Scholar
  24. Roth, W.-M.: 1998, Designing Communities, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Shapiro, B.: 1996, "A Case Study of Change in Elementary Student Teacher Thinking During an Independent Investigation in Science: Learning About the “Face of Science That Does Not Yet Know”', Science Education 80(5), 535-560.Google Scholar
  26. Swain, J.: 1991, "The Nature and Assessment of Scientific Explorations in the Classroom', School Science Review 72, 65-77.Google Scholar
  27. Symington, D. J.: 1987, "Technology in the Primary School Curriculum: Teacher Ideas', Research in Science and Technological Education 5(2), 167-172.Google Scholar
  28. The Nuffield Foundation: 1998, Design and Technology in the Primary Curriculum. Introducing the Nuffield Approach, The Nuffield Foundation, London.Google Scholar
  29. Tyler, R.: 1992, "Independent Research Projects in School Science: Case Studies of Autonomous Behavior', International Journal of Science Education 14, 393-411.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Campbell J. McRobbie
    • 1
  • Ian S. Ginns
    • 1
  • Sarah J. Stein
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Mathematics and Science EducationQueensland University of Technology – Kelvin GroveKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations