Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: Influence of treatment and patient characteristics
- 475 Downloads
This paper reports the quality of life (QoL) of a large cohort of Australian women three and twelve months after surgery for early stage breast cancer (ESBC), and shows that the impact of disease and treatment on QoL differed by age, education and marital status. Eighty-three percent of eligible patients were recruited; 86% had breast conserving surgery and 14% mastectomy. Response rates were 93% (n = 305) at three months and 88% (n = 291) at one year. Quality of life was measured with the EORTC core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and an ESBC-specific questionnaire. Multilevel analysis was used to estimate the effects and interactions of time, treatment and patient characteristics. Most symptoms declined between three months and one year, but arm and menopausal symptoms persisted. Emotional, social and role functioning improved over time, and fear of disease recurrence diminished. Younger women faired worse than older women on a broad range of QoL dimensions. Single women and those with less education faired worse on a number of dimensions. The negative impact of mastectomy on body image was greatest among married women, particularly young married women. These sociodemographic distinctions are relevant when discussing treatment options with women facing a diagnosis of ESBC.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer: An overview of randomised trials. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1444–1455.Google Scholar
- 3.National Health and Medical Research Council. The Management of Early Breast Cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1995.Google Scholar
- 7.Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG, EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Modular Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Oncology: An Update. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; 179–189.Google Scholar
- 8.Kenny P, King M, Shiell A, Seymour J, Boyages J, Hall J. Early Stage Breast Cancer - Quality of Life Three Months and One Year after First Treatment. CHERE Discussion Paper Series No. 42. Sydney, Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, 2000.Google Scholar
- 9.Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Sullivan M. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Brussels: EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life, 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.Google Scholar
- 13.Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd edn. London: Arnold, 1995.Google Scholar
- 14.Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Re-search. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.Google Scholar
- 16.Goldstein H, Rasbash J, Plewis I, et al. A User's Guide to MlwiN. London: Multilevel Models Project, University of London, 1998.Google Scholar
- 17.SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th edn., Vols 1 & 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1989.Google Scholar
- 20.Klee M, Groenvold M, Machin D. Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Res 1997; 6: 27–34.Google Scholar
- 27.Kenny P, Quine S, Shiell A, Cameron S. Participation in treatment decision making by women with early stage breast cancer: a qualitative approach. Report to the New South Wales Cancer Council. Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation Project Report No 5: Sydney, 1997.Google Scholar