Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 833–852 | Cite as

Diversity of coleoptera of the bracket fungus Fomitopsis pinicola in a Norwegian spruce forest

  • Karl H. Thunes
  • Fred Midtgaard
  • Ivar Gjerde
Article

Abstract

The beetle fauna of 299 sporocarps of the bracket fungus Fomitopsis pinicola in a 200 ha spruce forest in southeastern Norway was investigated in relation to sporocarp, tree and forest variables. The sporocarps contained 36 species of beetles, of which six species are on the Norwegian Red List. Of 12,373 individual beetles collected, 91% were Cis glabratus. Plots of species accumulation curves suggested that there may be more than 60 beetle species present in F. pinicola in the area, but that probably all the specialist Ciidae were found. The major factor influencing beetle diversity turned out to be the level of dead wood at and in the vicinity of the sampling site, with a higher number of species per unit volume of sporocarps in areas with high levels of dead wood. There were also significantly more red-listed species in those areas. Analysing the species occurrence with stepwise logistic regression, we show preferential habitat selection of the six most abundant species of Ciidae. Conservation of beetles associated with bracket fungi using amount of dead wood as a surrogate measurement is discussed.

coleoptera dead wood eastern Norway Fomitopsis pinicola species diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman JK and Shenefelt RD (1973) Organisms, especially insects, associated with wood rotting higher fungi (Basidiomycetes) in Wisconsin forests. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 61: 185–206Google Scholar
  2. Appelqvist T and Nordén B (1998) Kontinuitet-ett mångtydigt begrepp. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 92: 23–36Google Scholar
  3. ArcViewr GIS. (1996) The Geographical Information System for Everyone. ESRI, Redlands Benick L (1952) Pilzkäfer und Käferpilze. Acta Zoologica Fennica 70: 1–250Google Scholar
  4. Burnham KP and Overton WS (1978) Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65: 623–633Google Scholar
  5. Burnham KP and Overton WS (1979) Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60: 927–936Google Scholar
  6. Chao A (1984) Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11: 265–270Google Scholar
  7. Colwell RK (1997–1999) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5.0.1. User's guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/ estimatesGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell RK and Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 345: 101–118Google Scholar
  9. Ehnström B and Waldén HW (1986) Faunavård i skogsbruket. Del 2-Den lägre faunaen. Skogsstyrelsen, JönköpingGoogle Scholar
  10. Esseen P-A, Ehnström B, Ericson L and Sjöberg K (1992) Boreal forests-the focal habitats of Fennoscandia. In: Hansson L (ed) Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. Applications in Temperate and Boreal Environments, pp 252–325. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fossli T-E and Andersen J (1998) Host preference of Cisidae (Coleoptera) on tree-inhabiting fungi in northern Norway. Entomologica Fennica 9: 65–78Google Scholar
  12. Gjerde I, Rolstad J and Sætersdal M (1997) A comparison of methods for identification and selection of small-scale areas for biodiversity conservation in managed forests. Project plan, Norwegian Forest Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  13. Graves RC (1960) Ecological observations on the insects and other inhabitants of woody shelf fungi (Basidiomycetes: Polyporaceae) in the Chicago area. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 53: 61–78Google Scholar
  14. Hågvar S and Økland B (1997) Saproxylic beetle fauna associated with living sporocarps of Fomitopsis pinicola (Fr.) Karst. in four spruce forests with different management histories. Fauna Norvegica Series B 44: 95–105Google Scholar
  15. Haila Y (1994) Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 203–217Google Scholar
  16. Hanssen O, Ødegaard F and Kvamme T (1997) Forslag til rødliste for norske insekter. Del 1. Biller (Coleoptera). NINA Fagrapport 031: 1–31Google Scholar
  17. Heje KK and Nygaard J (1997) Norsk Skoghåndbok. Landbruksforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S (1989) Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaarsveld AS van, Freitag S, Chown SL, Muller C, Koch S, Hull H, Bellamy C, Krüger M, Endrödy-Younga S, Mansell MW and Scholtz CH (1998) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279: 2106–2108Google Scholar
  20. Jonsell M and Nordlander G (1995) Field attraction of Coleoptera to odors of the wood-decaying polypores Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 391–402Google Scholar
  21. Kaila L, Martikainen P, Punttila P and Yakovlev E (1994) Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on dead birch trunks decayed by different polypore species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 97–107Google Scholar
  22. Klimaszewski J and Peck SB (1987) Succession and phenology of beetle faunas (Coleoptera) in the fungus Polyporellus squamosus (Huds.: Fr.) Karst. (Polyporaceae) in Silesia, Poland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 542–550Google Scholar
  23. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS and Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forests. Nature391: 71–75Google Scholar
  24. Leschen RAB (1994) Ecological and behavioral correlates among mycophagous Coleoptera. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 92: 9–19Google Scholar
  25. Matthewman WG and Pielou DP (1971) Arthropods inhabiting the sporophores of Fomes fomentarius (Polyporaceae) in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Canadian Entomologist 103: 775–847Google Scholar
  26. Midtgaard F, Rukke BA and Sverdrup-Thygeson A (1998) Habitat use of the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): effects of basidiocarp size, humidity and competitors. European Journal of Entomology 95: 559–570Google Scholar
  27. Økland B, Bakke A, Hågvar S and Kvamme T (1996) What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 75–100Google Scholar
  28. Paviour-Smith K (1960) Insect succession in the “Birch-bracket fungus”, Polyporus betulinus. XI Internationaler Kongress für Entomologie Wien 1: 792–796Google Scholar
  29. Pielou DP (1966) The fauna of Polyporus betulinus (Bulliard) Fries (Basidiomycetes: Polyporaceae) in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Canadian Entomologist 98: 1233–1237Google Scholar
  30. Pielou DP and Matthewman WG (1966) The fauna of Fomes fomentarius (Linnaeus ex Fries) Kickx growing on dead birch in Gatineau Park, Quebec. Canadian Entomologist 98: 1308–1312Google Scholar
  31. Rolstad J, Rolstad E and Groven R (1996) Nordens eldste gran? Blyttia 54: 7–8Google Scholar
  32. Rukke BA and Midtgaard F (1998) The importance of scale and spatial variables for the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented forest landscape. Ecography 21: 561–572Google Scholar
  33. Ryvarden L (1991) Genera of polypores. Nomenclature and taxonomy. Synopsis Fungorum 5: 1–363Google Scholar
  34. Siitonen J (1994) Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 89–95Google Scholar
  35. Siitonen J and Martikainen P (1994) Occurrence of rare and threatened species living on decaying Populus tremula: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 185–191Google Scholar
  36. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Sverdrup-Thygeson A and Midtgaard F (1998)Fungus-infected trees as islands in boreal forests: spatial distribution of the fungivorous beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Écoscience 5: 486–493Google Scholar
  38. Thunes KH (1994) The coleopteran fauna of Piptoporus betulinus and Fomes fomentarius (Aphyllophorales. Polyporaceae) in western Norway. Entomologica Fennica 5: 157–168Google Scholar
  39. Thunes KH and Willassen E (1997) Species composition of beetles (Coleoptera) in the bracket fungi Piptoporus betulinus and Fomes fomentarius (Aphyllophorales: Polyporaceae): an explorative approach with canonical correspondence analysis. Journal of Natural History 31: 471–486Google Scholar
  40. Wilkinson L and Coward M (1996) Analysis of Variance. In: Wilkinson L (ed) SYSTAT 6.0 for Windows: Statistics, pp 119–223. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilkinson L, Engelman L and Marcantonio R (1996) Correlations, similarities and distance measures. In: Wilkinson L (ed) SYSTAT 6.0 for Windows: Statistics, pp 299–331. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl H. Thunes
    • 1
  • Fred Midtgaard
    • 2
  • Ivar Gjerde
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Forest Research InstituteFanaNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Forest Research InstituteNorway

Personalised recommendations