Transgenic Research

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 121–132

Efficiency and Stability of High Molecular Weight DNA Transformation: an Analysis in Tomato

  • Anne Frary
  • Carol M. Hamilton
Article

Abstract

The efficiency of the binary bacterial artificial chromosome (BIBAC) vector for Agrobacterium-mediated stable transfer of high molecular weight DNA into plants was tested in tomato. Several variables affecting transformation efficiency were examined including insert size, Agrobacterium genetic background, and the presence of additional copies of the virG, virE1 and virE2 genes. It was found that a helper plasmid containing extra copies of virG was an absolute requirement for obtaining tomato transformants with the BIBAC. MOG101 with the virG helper plasmid was found to be the most efficient strain for transfer of high molecular weight DNA (150 kb). Selected high molecular weight DNA transformants were advanced several generations (up to the R4) to assess T-DNA stability. This analysis showed that the T-DNA was stably maintained and inherited through several meioses regardless of whether it was in the hemizygous or homozygous state. Expression of a selectable marker gene within the T-DNA was also examined through several generations and no gene silencing was observed. Thus, the BIBAC is a useful system for transfer of large DNA fragments into the plant genome.

binary bacterial artificial chromosome BIBAC Agrobacterium-mediated transformation Lycopersicon esculentum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam G, Mullen JA and Kindle KL (1997) Retrofitting YACs for direct DNA transfer into plant cells. Plant J 11: 1349–1358.Google Scholar
  2. Barakat A, Matassi G and Bernardi G (1998) Distribution of genes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana and its implications for the genome organization of plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 10044–10049.Google Scholar
  3. Church GM and Gilbert W (1984) Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1991–1995.Google Scholar
  4. Cui Y, Bi Y-M, Brugiere N, Arnoldo M and Rothstein SJ (2000) The S locus glycoprotein and the S receptor kinase are sufficient for self-pollen rejection in Brassica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 3713–3717.Google Scholar
  5. Frary A and Earle ED (1996) An examination of factors affecting the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. Plant Cell Rep 16: 235–240.Google Scholar
  6. Fulton TM, Chunwongse J and Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13: 207–209.Google Scholar
  7. Gay P, LeCloq D, Steinmetz T, Berkelman T and Kado C (1985) Positive selection procedure for entrapment of insertion sequence elements in Gram-negative bacteria. J Bacteriol 164: 918–921.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton CM (1997) A binary-BAC system for plant transformation with high-molecular weight DNA. Gene 200: 107–116.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton CM, Frary A, Lewis C and Tanksley SD (1996) Stable transfer of intact high molecular weight DNA into plant chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 9975–9979.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton CM, Frary A, Xu Y, Tanksley SD and Zhang H-B (1999) Construction of tomato genomic DNA libraries in a binary-BAC (BIBAC) vector. Plant J 18: 223–229.Google Scholar
  11. Hamilton CM (1999) Binary BAC Vector. U.S. Patent 5,977,439. Issued Nov. 2.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen G, Das A and Chilton M-D (1994) Constitutive expression of the virulence genes improves the efficiency of plant transformation by Agrobacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7603–7607.Google Scholar
  13. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komnari T and Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6: 271–282.Google Scholar
  14. Jouanin L, Vilaine FE and Casse-Delbart F (1985) Localization and restriction maps of the replication origin regions of the plasmids of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4. Mol Gen Genet 201: 370–374.Google Scholar
  15. Kikkert JR, Humiston GA, Roy MK and Sanford JC (1999) Biological projectiles (phage, yeast, bacteria) for genetic transformation of plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35: 43–50.Google Scholar
  16. Kononov ME, Bassuner B and Gelvin SB (1997) Integration of T-DNA binary vector ‘backbone’ sequences into the tobacco genome: evidence for multiple complex patterns of integration. Plant J 11: 945–957.Google Scholar
  17. Liu C-N, Li XQ and Gelvin SB (1992) Multiple copies of virG enhance the transient transformation of celery, carrot and rice tissues by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Bio 20: 1071.Google Scholar
  18. Liu Y-G, Shirano Y, Fukaki H, Yanai Y, Tasaka M, Tabata S et al. (1999) Complementation of plant mutants with large genomic DNA fragments by a transformation-competent artificial chromosome vector accelerates positional cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 6535–6540.Google Scholar
  19. Martineau B, Voelker TA and Sanders RA (1994) On defining T-DNA. Plant Cell 6: 1032–1033.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer P (1999) The role of chromatin remodeling in transgene silencing and plant development. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35: 29–36.Google Scholar
  21. Meyer P and Saedler H (1996) Homology-dependent gene silencing in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 23–48.Google Scholar
  22. Miranda A, Janssen G, Hodges L, Peralta EG and Ream W (1992) Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers extremely long T-DNAs by a unidirectional mechanism. J Bacteriol 174: 2288–2297.Google Scholar
  23. Mullen J, Adam G, Blowers A and Earle ED (1998) Biolistic transfer of large DNA fragments to tobacco cells using YACs retrofitted for plant transformation. Mol Breeding 4: 449–457.Google Scholar
  24. Ramanathan V and Veluthambi K (1995) Transfer of non-T-DNA portions of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid pTiA6 from the left terminus of TL-DNA. Plant Mol Biol 28: 1149–1154.Google Scholar
  25. Rossi L, Hohn B and Tinland B (1996) Integration of complete transferred T-DNA units is dependent on the activity of virulence E2 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 126–130.Google Scholar
  26. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  27. San Miguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin YK, Motchoulskaia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A et al. (1996) Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome.Science 274: 765–768.Google Scholar
  28. Shizuya H, Birren B, Kim U-J, Mancino V, Slepak T, Tachiiri Y et al. (1992) Cloning and stable maintenance of 300-kilobasepair fragments of human DNA in Escherichia coli using an F-factor-based vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 8794–8797.Google Scholar
  29. Sundberg C, Meek, L, Carroll K, Das A and Ream W (1996) VirE1 protein mediates export of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein VirE2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plant cells. J Bacteriol 178: 1207–1212.Google Scholar
  30. Van Eck JM, Blowers AD and Earle ED (1995) Stable transformation of tomato cell cultures after bombardment with plasmid and YAC DNA. Plant Cell Rep 14: 299–304.Google Scholar
  31. Vaucheret H, Beclin C, Elmayan T, Feuerbach F, Godon C, Morel JB et al. (1998) Transgene-induced gene silencing in plants. Plant J 16: 651–659.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Frary
    • 1
  • Carol M. Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Science Center, Center for Advanced Technology/BiotechnologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant BreedingCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Paradigm Genetics, Inc.Research Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations