Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp 597–615 | Cite as

Diversity of plant uses in two Caiçara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil

  • Natalia Hanazaki
  • Jorge Y. Tamashiro
  • Hermógenes F. Leitão-Filho
  • Alpina Begossi


Caiçaras are native inhabitants of the Atlantic coast on southeastern Brazil, whose subsistence is based especially on agriculture and artisanal fishing. Because of their knowledge about the environment acquired through generations, Caiçara people can play an important role in Atlantic Forest conservation. An ethnobotanical study was conducted within two Caiçara communities (Ponta do Almada and Camburí beach, São Paulo State, Brazil), focusing on plant uses. In 102 interviews, 227 plant ethnospecies were quoted, mainly for food, medicine, handicraft and construction of houses and canoes. People from studied communities depend on the native vegetation for more than a half of the species known and used. Using diversity indices, plant uses are compared between studied communities and between gender and age categories within each community. We found quantitative differences in the knowledge about plants between gender categories for each kind of use (medicinal, food and handicrafts). Older and younger informants also have different knowledge about plants for handicraft and medicine, but not for edible plants.

Atlantic Forest biodiversity Caiçara diversity indices ethnobotany plant uses 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amorozo MCM and Gély A (1988) Uso de plantas medicinais por caboclos do Baixo Amazonas, Barcarena, Pará. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi-Série Botânica 4: 47-130Google Scholar
  2. Anderson AB and Posey DA (1989) Management of a tropical scrub savanna by the Gorotire Kayapo of Brazil. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 159-173Google Scholar
  3. Barrett B (1994) Medicinal plants of Nicaragua's Atlantic coast. Economic Botany 48: 8-20Google Scholar
  4. Begossi A (1995) Fishing spots and sea tenure: incipient forms of local management in Atlantic Forest coastal communities. Human Ecology 23: 387-406Google Scholar
  5. Begossi A (1996) Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Economic Botany 50: 280-289Google Scholar
  6. Begossi A, Leitão-Filho HF and Richerson PJ (1993) Plant uses in a Brazilian coastal fishing community (BÚzios Island). Journal of Ethnobiology 13: 233-256Google Scholar
  7. Benz BF, Santana MF, Pineda LR, Cevallos EJ, Robles HL and De Niz LD (1994) Characterization of mestizo plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan, Jalisco-Colima, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 14: 23-41Google Scholar
  8. Blackwell WH (1990) Poisonous and Medicinal Plants. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  9. Boster JS (1985) Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: evidence from Aguaruna cultivars. Economic Botany 38: 310-325Google Scholar
  10. Born GCC (1992) Comunidades tradicionais na Estação Ecológica da Juréia-Itatins: biodiversidade e medicina popular. Revista do Instituto Florestal 4: 804-807Google Scholar
  11. Brako L, Rossman AY and Farr D (1995) Scientific and Common Names of 7000 Vascular Plants in the United States. APS Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  12. Brush SB (1995) In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Science 35: 346-354Google Scholar
  13. De Miranda EE and Mattos C (1992) Brazilian rain forest colonization and biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 40: 275-296Google Scholar
  14. Dennis PA (1988) Herbal medicine among the Miskito of Eastern Nicaragua. Economic Botany 42: 16-28Google Scholar
  15. Diegues ACS (1983) Pescadores, Camponeses e Trabalhadores do mar. Ática, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  16. Diegues ACS (1994) O mito Moderno da Natureza Intocada. NUPAUB/CEMAR/USP, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  17. Figueiredo GM, Leitão-Filho HF and Begossi A (1993) Ethnobotany of Atlantic forest coastal communities: diversity of plant uses in Gamboa (Itacuruçá Island, Brazil). Human Ecology 21: 419-430Google Scholar
  18. Figueiredo GM, Leitão-Filho HF and Begossi A (1997) Ethnobotany of Atlantic forest coastal communities: II. Diversity of plant uses at Sepetiba Bay (SE Brazil). Human Ecology 25: 353-360Google Scholar
  19. Frankel OH and Soulé ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentry AH (1992) Tropical forest biodiversity: distributional patterns and their conservation significance. Oikos 63: 19-28Google Scholar
  21. Girón LM, Freire AA and Cáceres A (1991) Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal flora used by the Caribs of Guatemala. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 34: 173-187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Given DR and Harris W (1994) Techniques and Methods of Ethnobotany. The Commonwealth Secretariat Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanazaki N, Leitão-Filho HF and Begossi A (1996) Uso de recursos na mata Atlântica: o caso da Ponta do Almada (Ubatuba, Brasil). Interciencia 21: 268-276Google Scholar
  24. Hutcheson K (1970) A test for comparing diversities based on Shannon formula. Journal of Theoretical Biology 29: 151-154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kainer KA and DuryeaML (1992) Tapping women's knowledge: plant resource use in Extractive Reserves, Acre, Brazil. Economic Botany 46: 408-425Google Scholar
  26. Lima KSC (1985) Ubatuba nos cantos das praias. Ática, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  27. Lino CFL (ed) (1992) Reserva da biosfera da Mata Atlântica, v.1: referências básicas. Consórcio Mata Atlântica/UNICAMP, CampinasGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenzetti BB, Souza GEP, Sarti SJ, Santos Filho D and Ferreira SH (1991) Myrcene mimics the peripheral analgesic activity of lemongrass tea. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 34: 43-48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. MacArthur RH and Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Magurran A (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Croom-Helm Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Maikhuri RK and Gangwar AK (1993) Ethnobiological notes on the Khasi and Garo tribes of Meghlaya, northeast India. Economic Botany 47: 345-357Google Scholar
  32. Manns D (1995) Linalool and cineole type glucosides from Cunila spicata. Phytochemistry 39: 1115-1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcílio ML (1986) Caiçara: terra e população. Paulinas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  34. Mori SA, Boom BM and Prance GT (1981) Distribution patterns and conservation of eastern Brazilian coastal forest tree species. Brittonia 33: 233-245Google Scholar
  35. Mussolini G (1980) Ensaios de antropologia indígena e caiçara. Paz e Terra, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers N (1988) Threatened biotas: hotspots in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8: 1-20Google Scholar
  37. Oliveira RR, Lima DF, Sampaio PD, Silva RF and Toffoli DDiG (1994) Roça Caiçara, um sistema 'primitivo' auto-sustentável. Ciência Hoje 18: 44-51Google Scholar
  38. Pake CV (1987) Medicinal ethnobotany of Hmong refugees in Thailand. Journal of Ethnobiology 7: 13-26Google Scholar
  39. Panizza S, Scavone O, Rocha AB and Christodoulou M (1982) Emprego medicinal de plantas importadas e sucedâneas que ocorrem no Brasil. Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas 4: 27-38Google Scholar
  40. Phillips O and Gentry AH (1993a) The Useful Plants of Tamboapata, Peru: I. Statistical hypothesis testing with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47: 15-32Google Scholar
  41. Phillips O and Gentry AH (1993b) The Useful Plants of Tamboapata, Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47: 33-43Google Scholar
  42. Plotkin MJ (1988) The outlook for new agricultural and industrial products from the tropics. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity pp 106-116. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Prance GT (1995) A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of the biodiversity in the neotropics. In: Hawksworth DL (ed) Biodiversity. Measurement and Estimation, pp 89-99. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Prance GT, Baleé W, Boom BM and Carneiro RL (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1: 296-310Google Scholar
  45. Ribeiro B (1995) Os índios das águas pretas: modo de produção e equipamento produtivo. Companhia das Letras/Edusp, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  46. Rossato SC (1996) Uso de plantas por comunidades caiçaras do litoral norte do estado de São Paulo. Dissertação de mestrado. Departamento de Ecologia, IB/USPGoogle Scholar
  47. São Paulo Sarer E and Kokdil G (1991) Constituents of the essencial oil from Melissa officinalis. Planta Medical 57: 89-90Google Scholar
  48. Toledo VM, Batis AM, Becerra R, Martínez E and Ramos C (1995) La selva util: etnobotánica cuantitativa de los grupos indígenas del trópico hÚmedo de México. Interciencia 20: 177-187Google Scholar
  49. Wannmarcher L, Fuchs FD, Paoli CL, Gianlupi A, Fielmann HSC, Hassegawa Y, Ribeiro AMS, Muller AL, Lanca E and Marques A (1990) Plants employes in the treatment of anxiety and insomnia: I. An ethnopharmacological survey in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Fitoterapia 61: 445-448Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Hanazaki
    • 1
  • Jorge Y. Tamashiro
    • 2
  • Hermógenes F. Leitão-Filho
    • 1
  • Alpina Begossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas Ambientais (NEPAM)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de BotânicaUNICAMPCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations