Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: Further validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory
- 550 Downloads
Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by cancer patients, yet until recent years it has received little systematic attention, due in part to the lack of adequate instruments to measure fatigue. The primary aim of this report is to further validate a recently developed measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients: the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI). This 13-item self-report measure was designed to measure the intensity and duration of fatigue and its interference with quality of life. The FSI was originally validated in a sample of breast cancer patients and a sample of healthy individuals. In this study, the FSI was evaluated in an outpatient sample that included male and female cancer patients, as well as some older patients, with a variety of cancer diagnoses. A seven-item interference scale was found to have good internal consistency, with α coefficients above 0.90. Convergent validity was demonstrated via comparisons with an existing measure of fatigue. Construct validity was demonstrated via comparisons with measure of life satisfaction and depression as well as comparisons among subgroups of patients expected to differ in their experience of fatigue. Overall, the FSI was further established as a valid and reliable measure of fatigue in cancer patients. The potential application of this measure in psychosocial oncology research is discussed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Piper BG, Lindsey AM, Dodd MJ, Ferketich S, Paul SM, Weller S. Development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S, Tournquist E, Champagne M, Copp L, Weise R (eds), Key Aspects of Comfort: Management of Pain and Nausea. Philadelphia: Springer, 1989: 199–208.Google Scholar
- 4.Nail L, Winningham M. Fatigue. In: Groenwalk SL, Frogge M, Goodman M, Yarbo C (eds), Cancer nursing: principles and practice, 3rd edn. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 1993: 608–619.Google Scholar
- 10.McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. The Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1981.Google Scholar
- 12.Baker F, Denniston M, Hann D, et al. Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Domains Scale for Cancer (SLDS-C). Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- 13.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychol Meas 1977; 1(3): 385–401.Google Scholar
- 14.Devins GM, Orme CM, Costello CG, Binik YM. Measuring depressive symptoms in illness populations: Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Psychology & Health 1988; 2(2): 139–156.Google Scholar
- 16.Nunnally JM, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.Google Scholar
- 18.Baker F, Jodrey D, Zabora J, Douglas C, Fernandez-Kelly P. Empirically selected instruments for measuring quality of life dimensions in culturally diverse populations. J Natl Cancer Inst Mono 1996; 20: 39–47.Google Scholar