Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 727–751 | Cite as

Testing the use of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana

  • V.A. Funk
  • M. Fernanda Zermoglio
  • Naseem Nasir
Article

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study conducted at the request of the Government of Guyana by the Centre for the Study of Biological Diversity at the University of Guyana, and the Smithsonian Institution. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the utility of using systematic collections in identifying areas with a high priority for conservation. A biodiversity database and a gazetteer were assembled and interpreted primarily through the use of maps generated in ARC/INFO and ArcView. The data were examined to determine coverage and completeness, and while in general the results support a continued use of the methodology for making informed decisions in conservation related issues, several recommendations are offered in order to enhance the data. The primary use of the results of this study is in the identification of areas of interest for conservation and in the location of eleven areas covering most ecoregions in Guyana that are in need of additional study. The eleven areas have been chosen to avoid areas that are already allocated to logging and mining concessions or Amerindian lands. While it is true that this study would benefit from additional data and further analysis of those data, it is also true that decisions concerning areas for conservation in Guyana are being made in the near future, and if any data are to be used in this process, it will be those data presented in this paper.

biodiversity biological collections GIS Guyana protected areas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agriconsulting (1993) Preparatory study for the creation of a protected area in the Kanuku Mts. region of Guyana. Report prepared for the European Union.Google Scholar
  2. Austin MP and Heyligers PC (1989) Vegetation survey design for conservation: gradsect sampling of forests in north-east New South Wales. Biol. Conserv. 50: 13–32Google Scholar
  3. Austin MP and Heylingers PC (1991) New approach to vegetation survey design: gradsect sampling. In: Margules CR and Austin MP (eds) Nature Conservation: Cost-effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis, pp 31–36. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Beebe W (1925) Jungle Days. Garden City Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Beebe W (1927) Edge of the Jungle. Garden City Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggan J, Funk V, Kelloff C, Hoffman M, Cremers G and Feuillet C (1992) Checklist of the Plants of the Guianas. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Boggan J, Funk V, Kelloff C, Hoffman M, Cremers G and Feuillet C (1997) Checklist of the Plants of the Guianas, 2nd edition. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Borchsenius F (1997) Patterns of plant species endemism in Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 379–399Google Scholar
  9. Brown KS (1991) Conservation of neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM and Thomas JA (eds) The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats, pp 350–404. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Busby JR (1991) BIOCLIM - a bioclimate analysis and prediction system. In: Margules CR and Austin MP (eds), Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis. CSIRO: AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter G, Gillison AN et al. (1993) Domain: a flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 667–680Google Scholar
  12. Coddington J, Hammond P, Olivieri S, Robertson J, Sololov V, Stork N and Taylor E (1991) Monitoring and inventorying biodiversity from genes to ecosystems. In: Solbrig O (ed) From Genes to Ecosystems: A Research Agenda for Biodiversity, pp 83–117. IUBS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Colwell T and Coddington J (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London 345: 101–118Google Scholar
  14. Cotterill FPD (1995) Systematics, biological knowledge and environmental conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 183–205Google Scholar
  15. Dalfelt A (1978) Nature Conservancy survey of the Republic of Guyana. Report presented to the Nature ConservancyGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond JM (1985) Introductions, extinctions, exterminations, and invasions. In: Case TJ and Diamond JM (eds) Community Ecology pp 65–79. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinerstein E, Olson DM, Graham DJ, Webster AL, Primm SA, Bookbinder MP and Ledec G (1995) A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Erwin TL (1982) Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopterists' Bulletin 36: 74–75Google Scholar
  19. Erwin TL (1983) Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of American 29: 4–9Google Scholar
  20. Filer D (1994) BRAHMS: A Pocket Introduction and Demonstration GuideGoogle Scholar
  21. Funk V (1997) Using collections data and GIS to examine biodiversity information levels in Guyana. In: Hoagland KE and Rossman AY (eds) Global Genetic Resources: Access, Ownership, and Intellectual Property Rights, pp 117–128. Association of Systematic Collections, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Gadgil M, Berkes F and Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22: 151–156Google Scholar
  23. GAHEF (1991) National Forestry Action Plan, project No 22: Development of a protected area system. Report by the Guyana Agency for Health, Environmental Education and Food PolicyGoogle Scholar
  24. GAHEF (1992) Guyana/UNEP country study of biological diversity. Report presented to the UNEP. Report by the Guyana Agency for Health, Environmental Education and Food PolicyGoogle Scholar
  25. Glowka L, Burhenne-Guilmin F and Synge H (1994) A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Gland: IUCNGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman SM and Lanyon SM (1994) Scientific collecting. Conserv. Biol. 8: 314–315Google Scholar
  27. Gorts-Van Rijn ARA (1990) Flora of the Guianas. Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific BooksGoogle Scholar
  28. Helliwell DR (1969) Valuation of wildlife resources. Reg. Stud. 3: 41–47Google Scholar
  29. Huber O, Gharbarran G and Funk V (1995) Vegetation Map of Guyana. Centre for the Study of Biological Diversity, GuyanaGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones PG, Beebe SE and Thome J (1997) The use of geographical information systems in biodiversity exploration and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 947–958Google Scholar
  31. Kelloff C and Funk VA (1998) Preliminary Checklist of the Plants of Kaieteur National Park, Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim KC and McPheron BA (eds) (1993) Evolution of Insect Pests pp 3–26. New York: John Wiley and Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
  33. Lund HG and Thomas CE (1995) A Primer on Evaluation and Use of Natural Resource Information for Corporate Data Bases, General Technical Support WO-62. USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. MacKinnon J (1992) The Logic of Mass. Asian Bureau for ConservationGoogle Scholar
  35. MacKinnon J (1994) A Method for Evaluating and Classifying Habitat Importance for Biodiversity Conservation.WCMC/WCI Meeting on Identification of Habitat Criteria, 11- 12 October 1994. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Margules CR and Usher MB (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv. 21: 79–109Google Scholar
  37. Margules CR and Redhead TD (1991) Guidelines for using the BioRap Methodology and Tools. CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. May RM (1986) How many species are there? Nature 324: 514–515Google Scholar
  39. May RM (1988) How many species are there on Earth? Science 241: 1441–1449Google Scholar
  40. May RM (1990a) How many species? Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London 330: 292–304Google Scholar
  41. May RM (1990b) Taxonomy as destiny. Nature 347: 129–130Google Scholar
  42. McNeely J (1995) Human influences on biodiversity. In: Heywood VH and Watson RT (eds) Global Biodiversity Assessment, pp 715–821. Cambridge University Press, UNDPGoogle Scholar
  43. McNeely J, Miller KR, Reid WV, Mittermeier RA and Werner TB (1990) Conserving the World's Biological Diversity. World Resources Institute, IUCN, World Bank, World Wildlife Fund, Conservation International: Washington, DC and GlandGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller EH (1993) Biodiversity research in museums: a return to basics. In: Fenger MA, Miller EH, Johnson JF and Williams EJR (eds) Our Living Legacy: Proceedings of a Symposium on Biological Diversity pp 141–173. Royal British Colombia Museum, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  45. Mittermeier R, Myers N, Thomsen JB, DaFonseca GAB and Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to seting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 12: 516–520Google Scholar
  46. National Research Council (1993) A Biological Survey of the Nation. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Neldner VJ (1995) Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to determine the adequacy of sampling in vegetation surveys. Biol. Conserv. 73: 1–17Google Scholar
  48. Nix HA and Gillison AN (1985) Towards an operational framework for habitat and wildlife management. In: Kikkawa J (ed) Wildlife Management in the Forests and Forestry-controlled Lands in the Tropics and Southern Hemisphere pp 39–55. International Union of Forestry Research Organizations, St. Lucia, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  49. Olivieri ST (1995) Data information and management communication. In: Heywood VH and Watson RT (eds), Global Biodiversity Assessment, pp 607–670. UNEP, Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  50. Olson DM and Dinerstein E (1998) The global 200: a representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 12: 502–515Google Scholar
  51. Painter M (1988) Co-management with whom? Conservation and development in Latin America. Paper presented in the symposium 'Culture: the missing component in conservation and development', April 8- 9, 1988, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Parker T, Foster RB, Emmons LH, Freed P, Forsyth AB, Hoffman B and Gill BD (1993) RAP: A Biological Assessment of the Kanuku Mountain Region of Southwestern Guyana. Conservation International, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Pimm SL, and Gilpin ME (1989) Theoretical issues in conservation biology. In: May RM and Levin SA (eds) Perspectives in Ecological Theory, pp 287–305. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  54. Prance GT (1994) Amazonian tree diversity and the potential for supply of non-timber forest products. In: Leakey RRB and Newton AC (eds) Tropical Trees: The Potential for Domestication and the Rebuilding of Forest Resources, pp 7–15. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Prendergast JR, Quin RM, Lotten JH, Eversham BH and Gibbons DW(1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335–337Google Scholar
  56. Pressey RL, Humphries CJ, Margules CR, Vane-Wright RI and Williams PH (1993) Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 124–128Google Scholar
  57. Putney Allen D (1990) Guyana, identification of potential biosphere reserves and world heritage sites. Report prepared for the Government of GuyanaGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramdass I and Hanif M (1990) A definition of priority conservation areas in Amazonia: Guyana country paper. In: Conservation International (ed) Workshop' 90: Biological Priorities for Conservation in Amazonia: Conservation International, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. Redford KH (1992) The empty forest. BioScience 42: 412–422Google Scholar
  60. Samways MJ (1993) A spatial and process sub-regional framework for insect and biodiversity conservation research and management. In: Gaston KJ, New TR and Samways MJ (eds) Perspectives on Insect Conservation, pp 1–27. Intercept, Andover, UKGoogle Scholar
  61. Schuerholz G (1992) Kaieteur National Park Guyana: management plan, Vol. II. Report prepared forWorld Wildlife Fund, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Sizer N (1996) Profit without Plunder: Reaping Revenue from Guyana's Tropical Forests without Destroying Them. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith AP, Horning N and Moore D (1997) Regional biodiversity planning and lemur conservation with GIS in western Madagascar. Conserv. Biol. 11: 498–512Google Scholar
  64. Snyder D (1966) The Birds of Guyana. Peabody Museum, SalemGoogle Scholar
  65. Spellerberg IF (1994) Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  66. Spellerberg IF (1992) Biological Conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevens L and Traylor MA (1985) Ornithological Gazetteer of the Guianas. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  68. Stork NE (1995) In: Global Biodiversity Assessment Heywood VH and Watson RT (eds) Inventorying and Monitoring, pp 457–543. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  69. Stork NE (1988) Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation. Biological Journal of the Linnnean Society 35: 321–337Google Scholar
  70. Usher MB (1986) Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values. In: Usher MB (ed) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation, pp 3–44. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. Willis CK, Cowling RM and Lombard AT (1996) Patterns of endemism in the limestone flora of South African lowland fynbos. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 55–73Google Scholar
  72. Wilson EO (1987) The little things that run the world: the importance and conservation of invertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 1: 344–346Google Scholar
  73. WRI/IUCN/UNEP (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy: guidelines for action to save, study, and use earth's biotic wealth sustainably and equitably. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC; World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland; The United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • V.A. Funk
    • 1
  • M. Fernanda Zermoglio
    • 2
  • Naseem Nasir
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanySmithsonian InstitutionWashington, D.CUSA
  2. 2.Centre for the Study of Biological DiversityUniversity of GuyanaGeorgetownGuyana

Personalised recommendations