Autonomous Robots

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 7–18 | Cite as

Development of an Autonomous Quadruped Robot for Robot Entertainment

  • Masahiro Fujita
  • Hiroaki Kitano


In this paper, we present Robot Entertainment as a new field of the entertainment industry using autonomous robots. For feasibility studies of Robot Entertainment, we have developed an autonomous quadruped robot, named MUTANT, as a pet-type robot. It has four legs, each of which has three degree-of-freedom, and a head which also has three degree-of-freedom. Micro camera, stereo microphone, touch sensors, and other sensor systems are coupled with newly developed behavior generation system, which has emotion module as its major components, and generates high complex and interactive behaviors. Agent architecture, real-world recognition technologies, software component technology, and some dedicated devices such as Micro Camera Unit, were developed and tested for this purpose. From the lessons learned from the development of MUTANT, we refined the design concept of MUTANT to derive requirements for a general architecture and a set of interfaces of robot systems for entertainment applications. Through these feasibility studies, we consider entertainment applications a significant target at this moment from both scientific and engineering points of view.

autonomous robot quadruped robot entertainment agent architecture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albus, J. S. 1996. The Engineering of Mind. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on simulation od adaptive behavior (SAB96, From animals to animats 4), pp.23-32.Google Scholar
  2. Bonasso, R. P., Kortenkamp, D., and Miller, D. 1995. Experiences with an Architecture for Intelligent, Reactive Agents. In IJCAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, R. A. 1986. A Robust Layered COntrol System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2(1):14-23.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, R. A. 1989. A Robot that Walks: Emergent Behavior from Carefully Evolved Network. Neural Computation, 1:253-262.Google Scholar
  5. Firby, R. J. 1994. Task Networks for Controlling Continuous Processes. In Proceedings on the Second International Conference on AI Planing Systems.Google Scholar
  6. Fujisaki, H. and HIrose, K. 1984. Analysis of Voice Funcdamental frequency contours for declarative sentenses of Japanease. J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn., 5(4):233–242.Google Scholar
  7. Fujita, M. and Kageyama, K. 1997. An Open Architecture for Robot Entertainment. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Ray, pp.234-242.Google Scholar
  8. Fujita, M., Kitano, H. and Kageyama, K. 1997. A Legged Robot for RoboCup based on OPENR. In The First International Workshop on RoboCup in conjunction with IJCAI-97, Nagoya, pp.69-74.Google Scholar
  9. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., and Vlissides, J. 1995. Design Pattern: Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Hayes-Roth, B. 1995. An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems. Artificial Intelligence, 72(1-2):329-365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lida, S. and Yuta, S. 1991. Vechicle command system and trajectory control for autonomous mobile robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems 91, pp.212-217.Google Scholar
  12. Inaba, M. 1993. Remote-Brained Robotics: Interfacing AI with Real World Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR6), pp.335-344.Google Scholar
  13. Kitano, H. (ed). 1994. Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Entertainment and AI/Alife, Seattle.Google Scholar
  14. Kitano, H. (ed). 1995. Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Entertainment and AI/Alife, Montreal.Google Scholar
  15. Kitano, H., Asada, M., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I., and Osawa, E. 1997. RoboCup: The Robot World Cup Initiative. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Rey, pp.340-347.Google Scholar
  16. Kitano, H., et al. 1997. RoboCup: A Challenge Problem for AI. AI Magazine, Spring:73-85.Google Scholar
  17. Noreils, F. R. 1993. Toward a Robot Architecture Integrating Cooperation between Mobile Robots. Application to Indoor Environment. The International Journal of Robotics Reseach, 12(1):79- 98.Google Scholar
  18. Maes, P. 1995. Artificial Life meets Entertainment: Lifelike Autonomus Agents. Communication of the ACM: Special Issue on New Horizons of Commercial and Industrial AI, pp.108-114.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, B. 1988. Object-Oriented Software Construction, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Soukup, J. 1994. TAMING C++: Pattern Classes and Persistence for Large Projects, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Tosa, N. 1993. Neurobaby. In SIGGRAPH-93 Visual Proceedings, Tomorrow's Realities, ACM, pp.212-213.Google Scholar
  22. Ueda, K. and Takagi, Y. 1996. Development of Micro Camera Module. In Proceedings of the 6th Sony Research Forum, pp.114-119.Google Scholar
  23. Yokote, Y. 1992. The Apertos Reflective Operating System: The Concept and Its Implementation. In Proceeding of the 1992 International Conference of Object-Oriented Programing, System, Languages, and Applications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masahiro Fujita
    • 1
  • Hiroaki Kitano
    • 2
  1. 1.Sony CorporationD21 LaboratoryJapan
  2. 2.Sony Computer Science Laboratory IncJapan

Personalised recommendations