Autonomous Robots

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 273–286 | Cite as

Limit Cycles in a Passive Compass Gait Biped and Passivity-Mimicking Control Laws

  • Ambarish Goswami
  • Bernard Espiau
  • Ahmed Keramane
Article

Abstract

It is well-known that a suitably designed unpowered mechanical bipedrobot can “walk” down an inclined plane with a steady periodicgait. The energy required to maintain the motion comes from theconversion of the biped's gravitational potential energy as itdescends. Investigation of such passive natural motions maypotentially lead us to strategies useful for controlling activewalking machines as well as to understand human locomotion.

In this paper we demonstrate the existence and the stability ofsymmetric and asymmetric passive gaits using a simple nonlinear bipedmodel. Kinematically the robot is identical to a double pendulum(similar to the Acrobot and the Pendubot) and is able to walk withthe so-called compass gait. Using the passivebehavior as a reference we also investigate the performance ofseveral active control schemes. Active control can enlarge the basinof attraction of passive limit cycles and can create new gaits.

biped robot compass gait passive gait limit cycle phase plane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bavarian, B., Wyman, B.F., and Hemami, H. 1983. Control of the constrained planar simple inverted pendulum. In International Journal of Control, 37(4):741–753.Google Scholar
  2. Berkemeier, M.D. and Fearing, R.S. 1992. Control of a two-link robot to achieve sliding and hopping gaits. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Nice, Vol. 1, pp. 286–291.Google Scholar
  3. Block, D.J. and Spong, M.W. 1995. Mechanical design & control of the pendubot. In Proc. of SAE Earthmoving Industry Conference, Peoria, IL.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, E. and Howe, R.D. 1996. Foot placement and velocity control in smooth bipedal walking. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  5. Espiau, B. and Goswami, A. 1993. Compass gait revisited. In Proc. of the Symposium of Robot Control (SyRoCo), Capri, Italy.Google Scholar
  6. Gajewski, K. and Radziszewski, B. 1987. On the stability of impact system. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, 35(3/4):183–189.Google Scholar
  7. Garcia, M., Chatterjee, A., Coleman, M., and Ruina, A. 1997. The simplest walking model: Stability, complexity, and scaling. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (accepted).Google Scholar
  8. Golliday, C.L. and Hemami, H. 1977. An approach to analyzing biped locomotion dynamics and designing robot locomotion controls. IEEE Trans. on Aut. Cont. AC, 22(6):964–972.Google Scholar
  9. Goswami, A., Thuilot, B., and Espiau, B. 1996. Compass-like biped robot Part I: Stability and bifurcation of passive gaits. Technical report, INRIA. No. 2996.Google Scholar
  10. Grishin, A.A., Formal'sky, A.M., Lensky, A.V., and Zhitomirsky, S.V. 1994. Dynamic walking of a vehicle with two telescopic legs controlled by two drives. International Journal of Robotics Research, 13(2):137–147.Google Scholar
  11. Hayashi, C. 1985. Nonlinear Oscillations in Physical Systems. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurmuzlu, Y. and Moskowitz, G.D. 1986. The role of impact in the stability of bipedal locomotion. Dynamics and Stability of Systems, 1(3):217–234.Google Scholar
  13. Hurmuzlu, Y. and Chang, T.-H. 1992. Rigid body collisions of a special class of planar kinematic chains. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5):964–971.Google Scholar
  14. Kelso, J.A.S., Holt, K.G., Rubin, P., and Kugler, P.N. 1981. Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: Theory and data. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13(4):226–261.Google Scholar
  15. McGeer, T. 1990. Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. of Rob. Res., 9(2):62–82.Google Scholar
  16. Miura, H. and Shimoyama, I. 1984. Dynamic walk of a biped. Int. J. of Rob. Res., 3(2):60–74.Google Scholar
  17. Ott, E. 1993. Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press: UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ambarish Goswami
    • 1
  • Bernard Espiau
    • 1
  • Ahmed Keramane
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA Rhône-AlpesMontbonnot Saint MartinFrance

Personalised recommendations