Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 531–547 | Cite as

Extending the Namibian protected area network to safeguard hotspots of endemism and diversity

  • Phoebe Barnard
  • Christopher J. Brown
  • Alice M. Jarvis
  • Antony Robertson
  • Leon Van Rooyen


Namibia's state protected area network (PAN) covers 13.8% of the country's land area, but is seriously inadequate as a basis for effective biodiversity conservation. The early parks system was not designed with biological diversity in mind, and reflects instead a history of ideological, economic and veterinary considerations. Currently, parks in the Namib Desert biome make up 69% of the PAN, while savanna and woodland biomes are somewhat underrepresented (7.5 and 8.4% of their respective land areas), and the Karoo biome is badly underrepresented (1.6%). Four of 14 desert vegetation types are comprehensively protected, with 67 to 94% representation in the PAN, yet six savanna types have 0 to 2% representation by area. Mountain Savanna, a vegetation type unique to Namibia, is wholly unprotected. The status of two marine reserves, which in theory protect only 0.01% of Namibia's marine environment, needs clarification and augmentation with new reserves. Nearly 85% of Namibia's land is zoned for agriculture, so effective biodiversity protection means working outside the PAN to improve the sustainability and diversity of farming practices. Wildlife conservancies on commercial and communal farmlands show excellent potential to mitigate the ecological skew in the state PAN, with the ecological management of large areas being decentralized to rural communities in habitats otherwise neglected for conservation. Two important endemism zones, the Kaoko escarpment and coastal plain and the Sperrgebiet succulent steppe, plus the species-rich Caprivi area, offer three valuable opportunities for regional consolidation of protected areas into transboundary 'peace parks' or biosphere reserves.

protected area network conservation history endemism conservancy biosphere reserve 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, F. and Werner, W. (1990) The Land Issue in Namibia: an Enquiry. Windhoek: Namibia Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Namibia.Google Scholar
  2. Ashley, C. (1995) Tourism, communities, and the potential impacts on local incomes and conservation. DEA Research Discussion Paper 10, 1–42 + appendices. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Ashley, C. (1996) Incentives affecting biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: the case of land use options in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 13, 1–21. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Ashley, C. and Barnes, J.I. (1996) Wildlife use for economic gain: the potential for wildlife to contribute to development in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 12, 1–23. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, L. (1996) An overview of Namibia's game parks and recreation areas. Namibia Environ. 1, 32–49.Google Scholar
  6. Barnard, P. (ed.) (1998) Biological Diversity in Namibia: a Country Study. Windhoek: Ministry of Environment and Tourism/National Biodiversity Task Force.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, J.I. (1995) The value of non-agricultural land use in some Namibian communal areas: a data base for planning. DEA Research Discussion Paper 6, 1–21. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Barnes, J.I. and de Jager, J.L.V. (1996) Economic and financial incentives for wildlife use on private land in Namibia and the implications for policy. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 26, 37–46.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, H.H. (in press) Historical review of the Etosha region and its subsequent administration as a national park. Madoqua.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, C.J. (ed.) (1992) Namibia’s Green Plan: Environment and Development. Windhoek: Republic of Namibia.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, C.J. (1996) The outlook for the future. Namibia Environ., 1, 15–20.Google Scholar
  12. Curtis, B.A., Roberts, K.S., Griffin, M., Bethune, S., Hay, C.J. and Kolberg, H. (1998) Biodiversity and conservation of Namibian freshwater macro-invertebrates, fish and amphibians. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 447.Google Scholar
  13. de la Bat, B.G.J. (1982) Etosha, 75 years. South West Africa Yearbook, pp. 11–22. Windhoek: south west Africa Annual, John Meinert Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Giess, W. (1971) A preliminary vegetation map of South West Africa. Dinteria 4, 5–114.Google Scholar
  15. Griffin, M. (1998) The species diversity, distribution and conservation of Namibian mammals. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 483.Google Scholar
  16. Griffin, R.E. (1998) Species richness and biogeography of non-acarine arachnids in Namibia. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 467.Google Scholar
  17. Grobler, D., facilitator (1997) Workshop session: Conservation areas. In Proceedings Document: Annual Ministry Meeting, 22-24 October 1996 (H. Coetsee, ed.) pp. 13–14. Windhoek: Ministry of Environment and Tourism.Google Scholar
  18. Hacker, J.E., Cowlishaw, G. and Williams, P.H. (1998) Patterns of African primate diversity and their evaluation for conservation-area selection. Biol. Conserv. 84, 251–62.Google Scholar
  19. Harrison, J.A., Allan, D.G., Underhill, L.G., Herremans, M., Tree, A.J., Parker, V. and Brown, C.J. (eds.) (1997) The Atlas of Southern African Birds. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa.Google Scholar
  20. Hilton-Taylor, C. (1996) Red Data List of southern African plants. Strelitzia 4, 1–117.Google Scholar
  21. Jarvis, A.M. and Robertson, A. (1997) Endemic birds of Namibia: evaluating their status and mapping biodiversity hotspots. DEA Research Discussion Paper 14, 1–102. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, B. (1991) A fragile land. In Restoring the Land: Environment and Change in Post-Apartheid South Africa (M. Ramphele and C. McDowell, eds) pp. 187–200. London: The Panos Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, B.T.B. (1995) Wildlife management, utilization and tourism in communal areas: benefits to communities and improved resource management. DEA Research Discussion Paper 5, 1–19 + appendices. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  24. Kingdon, J. (1990). Island Africa: the Evolution of Africa's Rare Animals and Plants. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  25. Kutzner, J. (1995) SWAA Nature Conservation and Tourism 1959-1981. NTB 1/1/44. Windhoek: National Archives of Namibia.Google Scholar
  26. Lenssen, J., Tarr, P. and Berry, H. (1991) An assessment of visitor statistics and linefishing along the Sandwich shoreline, Namib-Naukluft Park, Namibia. Madoqua 18, 33–6.Google Scholar
  27. Lombard, A.T. (1995) The problems with multi-species conservation: do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? S. Afr. J. Zool. 30, 145–63.Google Scholar
  28. Lovegrove, B. (1993) The Living Deserts of Southern Africa. Vlaeberg, South Africa: Fernwood Press.Google Scholar
  29. Maggs, G.L., Craven, P. and Kolberg, H.H. (1998) Plant richness, endemism, and genetic resources in Namibia. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 435.Google Scholar
  30. Nujoma, S. (1997) President’s speech to community leaders and political governors, Mokuti Lodge, Namibia, 1 February.Google Scholar
  31. O’Toole, M.J. (1997) Marine environmental threats. Comprehensive assessment of environmental problems and opportunities for USAID intervention in Namibia. Consultancy report. Windhoek: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  32. Owen-Smith, G. (1996) The Kaokoveld, southern Africa’s last wilderness. Namibia Environ. 1, 63–5.Google Scholar
  33. Pallett, J. (ed.) (1995) The Sperrgebiet, Namibia’s Least Known Wilderness. An Environmental Profile of the Sperrgebiet or Diamond Area 1, in South-Western Namibia. Windhoek: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia/NAMDEB.Google Scholar
  34. Population Planning Unit (1994) Population Data for Development Planning. Windhoek: National Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  35. Quan, J., Barton, D. and Conroy, C. (1994) A preliminary assessment of the economic impact of desertification in Namibia. DEA Research Discussion Paper 3, 1–148. Windhoek: Directorate of Environmental Affairs.Google Scholar
  36. Rebelo, A.G. (1994) Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. In Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa (B.J. Huntley, ed.) pp. 231–57. Pretoria: National Botanical Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Republic of South Africa (1964) Report of the Commission of Enquiry into South West Africa Affairs 1962-1963. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  38. Robertson, A., Jarvis, A.M., Brown, C.J. and Simmons, R.E. (1998) Avian diversity and endemism in Namibia. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 495.Google Scholar
  39. Sakko, A.L. (1998) The influence of the Benguela upwelling system on Namibia’s marine biodiversity. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 419.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider, H.P. (1994) Animal Health and Veterinary Medicine in Namibia. Windhoek: Agrivet.Google Scholar
  41. Schoeman, A. (1996) Conservation in Namibia: laying the foundation. Namibia Environ. 1, 6–13.Google Scholar
  42. Simmons, R.E., Griffin, M., Griffin, R.E., Marais, E. and Kolberg, H. (1998) Endemism in Namibia: patterns, processes and predictions. Biodiv. Conserv. 7, 513.Google Scholar
  43. Strohbach, B.J. (1992) Loss of genetic diversity due to veld degradation: a case study in the northern Kalahari, Grootfontein district. In Proceedings of the First National Workshop on Plant Genetic Resources (G.L. Maggs and B. Strohbach, eds), Swakopmund, 1991. Dinteria 23, 102–15.Google Scholar
  44. Tarr, P.W. (1995) Namibia’s Environmental Assessment Policy for Sustainable Development and Environmental Conservation. Windhoek: Ministry of Environment and Tourism.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, P.H. (in press) Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In Conservation in a Changing World: Integrating Processes into Priorities for Action (G.M. Mace, A. Balmford and J. Ginsberg, eds). London: Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, G. (1997) Preliminary account of the floristic zones of the Sperrgebiet (Protected Diamond Area) in southwest Namibia. Dinteria 25, 1–68.Google Scholar
  47. World Resources Institute (1996) World Resources 1996-97, a Guide to the Global Environment. WRI/UNEP/UNDP/World Bank. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phoebe Barnard
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Brown
    • 1
  • Alice M. Jarvis
    • 1
  • Antony Robertson
    • 1
  • Leon Van Rooyen
    • 2
  1. 1.Namibian National Biodiversity Programme, Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and TourismWindhoekNamibia
  2. 2.Directorate of Resource Management, Ministry of Environment and TourismWindhoekNamibia

Personalised recommendations