Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 431–444 | Cite as

Cephalopod and Groundfish Landings: Evidence for Ecological Change in Global Fisheries?

  • J.F. Caddy
  • P.G. Rodhouse
Article

Abstract

Cephalopod fisheries are among the few still with some local potential for expansion; in fact, as groundfish landings have declined globally, cephalopod landings have increased. We propose the hypothesis that, although increased cephalopod landings may partly reflect increased market demand, overfishing groundfish stocks has positively affected cephalopod populations. Data from 15 key FAO areas reveal that, with the exception of the north- east Atlantic, cephalopod landings have increased significantly over the last 25 years while groundfish have risen more slowly, remained stable, or declined. In terms of volume, cephalopods have not replaced groundfish. This is hypothesized as owing to the shorter life cycle of cephalopods, and rapid turnover and lower standing stocks than for longer-lived finfish species. Under high fishing pressure, groundfish are probably poor competitors, having less opportunity for spawning and replacement. In West Africa, the Gulf of Thailand and Adriatic there is strong circumstantial evidence that fishing pressure has changed ecological conditions and cephalopod stocks have increased as predatory fish have declined. We recommend that this hypothesis be tested thoroughly in other areas where suitable data exist. Most coastal and shelf cephalopod fisheries are likely to be fully exploited or overexploited, and current annual fluctuations in cephalopod landings are probably largely environmentally-driven.

cephalopods ecological interactions global trends groundfish 

References

  1. Bakun, A. and Csirke, J. (1998) Environmental processes and recruitment variability. In Rodhouse, P.G., Dawe, E.G. and O'Dor, R.K., eds. Squid recruitment dynamics. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Caddy, J.F. (1983) The cephalopods: factors relevant to their population dynamics and to the assessment of stocks. In Caddy, J.F., ed. Advances in assessment of world cephalopod resources. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 231, 416–452.Google Scholar
  3. Caddy, J.F. (1993) Towards a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fisheries ecosystems of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas. Rev. Fish. Sci. 1, 57–95.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, M.R. (1983) Cephalopod biomass — estimation from predation. Mem. Natl Mus. Victoria 44, 95–107.Google Scholar
  5. Csirke, J. (1987) The Patagonian fishery resources and the offshore fisheries in the South-West Atlantic. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 286: 75 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Ehrhardt, N.M. (1991) Potential impact of a seasonal migratory jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) stock on a Gulf of California sardine (Sardops sagax caerulea) population. Bull. Mar. Sci. 49, 325–332.Google Scholar
  7. FAO (1992) Marine fisheries and the Law of the Sea: a decade of change. FAO Fish. Circ. 853, 69 pp.Google Scholar
  8. FAO (1993) Yearbook of Fishery Statistics. Catches and Landings. Vol. 76. Rome: FAO, 688 pp.Google Scholar
  9. FAO (1994) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 335, 136 pp.Google Scholar
  10. FAO (1995) Yearbook of Fishery Statistics. Catches and Landings. Vol. 80. Rome: FAO, 713 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Garcia, S.M. and Majkowski, J. (1993) State of high seas resources. In Kuribayashi, T. and Miles, E.L., eds. The Law of the Sea in the 1990's: a Framework for International Cooperation. Law of the Sea Institute; University of Hawaii, Honolulu: pp. 175–236.Google Scholar
  12. Olson, R.J. (1984) Feeding and energetics studies of yellow fin tuna: food for ecological thought. Collected Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 17, 444–457.Google Scholar
  13. Pauly, D. (1979) Theory and management of tropical multi-species stocks: a review, with emphasis on the southeast Asian demersal fisheries. ICLARM Stud. Rev. 1, 35 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Pope, J.G. and Knights, B.J. (1982) Comparison of length distributions of combined catches of all demersal fishes in surveys in the North Sea and at Faroe Bank. In Mercer, M.C., ed. Multispecies approaches to fisheries management advice. pp. 116–118. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59; 169 p.Google Scholar
  15. Rodhouse, P.G. (1990) Cephalopod fauna of the Scotia Sea at South Georgia: potential for commercial exploitation and possible consequences. In Kerry, K. and Hempel, G., eds. Ecological Change and the Conservation of Antarctic Ecosystems. (Proc. 5th SCAR Symp. Antarct. Biol). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 289–298.Google Scholar
  16. Rodhouse, P.G. (1997) Precautionary measures for a new Martialia hyadesi (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) fishery in the Scotia Sea: an ecological approach. CCAMLR Science 4, 125–139.Google Scholar
  17. Rodhouse, P.G. and Nigmatullin, Ch.M. (1996) Role as consumers. In Clarke, M.R., ed. The Role of Cephalopods in the World's Oceans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 351, 1003–1022.Google Scholar
  18. Sakurai, Y. (1997) Watching in the sea from captive world (Suisou no Sekai kara Kaiyou wo nozoku), Fisheries Science and Marine Science, Special Vol. 12, Kaiyo Monthly (Gekkan Kaiyo), 67–74.Google Scholar
  19. Smale, M.J. (1996) Cephalopods as prey. IV. Fishes. In Clarke, M.R., ed. The Role of Cephalopods in the World's Oceans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 351, 1067–1081.Google Scholar
  20. Voss, G.L (1973) Cephalopod resources of the world. FAO Fish. Circ. 149, 75 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Worms, J. (1983) World fisheries for cephalopods: a synoptic overview. In Caddy, J.F., ed. Advances in assessment of world cephalopod resources. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 231, 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.F. Caddy
    • 1
  • P.G. Rodhouse
    • 2
  1. 1.Fishery Resources and Environment Division, FAORomeItaly
  2. 2.British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High CrossCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations