Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 7, Issue 11, pp 1447–1455 | Cite as

Rapoport's rule: an explanation or a byproduct of the latitudinal gradient in species richness?

  • Jurek Kolasa
  • Chad L. Hewitt
  • James A. Drake
Article

Abstract

A recent explanation of the declining species richness gradient with increasing latitude away from the tropics implicated broad scale habitat variability, an associated range expansion, and a resulting increase in niche breadth. The niche breadth in turn was thought to affect richness by competition and rescue effect. While all three factors appear to be correlated, neither the postulated nor alternative causal mechanisms have been tested. We conduct such a test using a system which has all the attributes of the large scale pattern but which, in contrast to continental scale observations, allows for estimation or control of crucial variables such as taxonomic composition, habitat heterogeneity, habitat variability, exact species distribution, and local richness. Specifically, we test the alternative that the correlation between the geographical range of species and local diversity is a function of differential species survival and link this phenomenon to habitat variability. We use 40 species of aquatic invertebrates inhabiting a landscape of 49 miniature rock pools on the coast of Jamaica. The system we examined exhibits a gradient of increasing richness with decreasing habitat variability, analogous to the broad scale latitudinal pattern. Furthermore, species with broader ecological ranges are also broadly distributed. Superficially, this appears to be in agreement with the older explanations but two facts suggest different causes. First, there is no evidence of a ‘rescue effect’ maintaining high richness in many habitats despite their proximity to species sources. Second, ecologically broad species coexist with habitat specialists without reducing richness in jointly occupied habitats.

geographical range species diversity latitudinal gradient environmental variability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burgman, M.A. (1989) The habitat volumes of scarce and ubiquitous plants: a test of the model of environmental control. Am. Nat. 133, 228–39.Google Scholar
  3. Drake, J.A., Hewitt, C.L., Huxel, G.R. and Kolasa, J. (1996) Diversity and higher-levels of organization. In Biodiversity: a Biology of Numbers and Differences (K. Gaston, ed.) pp. 149–166. Cambridge: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  4. Huston, M. (1994) Biological Diversity: the Coexistence of Species in Changing Landscapes, p. 681. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Huston, M. (1995) Patterns of species diversity on coral reefs. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 149–77.Google Scholar
  6. Janzen, D.H. (1967) Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am. Nat. 101, 233–49.Google Scholar
  7. Karr, J.R. and Freemark, K.E. (1983) Habitat selection and environmental gradients: dynamics in the ‘stable’ tropics. Ecology 64, 1481–94.Google Scholar
  8. Kolasa, J. (1989) Ecological systems in hierarchical perspective: breaks in the community structure and other consequences. Ecology 70, 36–47.Google Scholar
  9. Kolasa, J., Drake, J., Huxel, G.R. and Hewitt, C.L. (1996) Hierarchy underlies patterns of variability in species inhabiting natural microcosms. Oikos 77, 259–66.Google Scholar
  10. Kolasa, J. and Drake, J. (1998) Abudance and range relationship in a fragmented landscape: connections and contrasts between competing models. Coenoses (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Lewin, R. (1989) Biologists disagree over bold signature of nature. Science 244, 527–8.Google Scholar
  12. Lyons, S.K. and Willig, M.R. (1997) Latitudinal patterns of range size: methodological concerns and empirical evaluations for New World bats and marsupials. Oikos 79, 568–80.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, M.W. and van der Maarel, E. (1995) Variance in species richness, species association, and niche limitation. Oikos 73, 203–13.Google Scholar
  14. Rapoport, E.H. (1982) Aerography: Geographical Strategies of Species. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rohde, K., Heap, M. and Heap, D. (1993) Rapoport's rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. Am. Nat. 142, 1–16.Google Scholar
  16. Rohde, K. (1996). Rapoport's rule is a local phenomenon and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiv. Lett. 3, 10–3.Google Scholar
  17. Rohde, K. and Heap, M. (1996). Latitudinal ranges of teleost fish in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific oceans. Am. Nat. 147, 659–65.Google Scholar
  18. Rohde, K. (1997). The larger area of the tropics does not explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Oikos 79, 169–72.Google Scholar
  19. Ruggiero, A. (1994). Latitudinal correlates of the sizes of mammalian geographical ranges in South America. J. Biogeogr. 21, 545–59.Google Scholar
  20. Schuh, M. and Diesel, R. (1995) Breeding in a rock pool: Larvae of the semiterrestrial crab Armases [= Sesarma] miersii (Rathbun) (Decapoda: Grapsidae) develop in a highly variable environment. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 185, 109–29.Google Scholar
  21. Stevens, G.C. (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am. Nat. 133, 240–56.Google Scholar
  22. Stevens, G.C. (1996) Extending Rapoport's rule to Pacific marine fishes. J. Biogeogr. 23, 149–54.Google Scholar
  23. Therriault, T.W. and Kolasa, J. (1998) Physical determinants of species richness–insights from small scale aquatic systems. Freshwat. Biol. (submitted).Google Scholar
  24. Wetzel, R.G. (1983) Limnology. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Wright, D.H., Currie, D.J. and Maurer, B.A. (1993) Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities (R.E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, eds) pp. 66–74. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Zar, J.H. (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jurek Kolasa
    • 1
  • Chad L. Hewitt
    • 2
  • James A. Drake
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Division of Fisheries, Centre for Research on Introduced Marine PestsCSIROCastray Esplanade, HobartAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and Graduate Program in EcologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations