European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 106, Issue 4, pp 373–378 | Cite as

Genomic Variation within Monilinia laxa, M. fructigena and M. fructicola, and Application to Species Identification by PCR

  • Renaud Ioos
  • Pascal Frey

Abstract

Brown rot and twig canker of fruit trees are caused by Monilinia laxa, M. fructigena and M. fructicola. The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) between the 18S and the 28S rRNA genes of four M. laxa and four M. fructigena isolates collected in France was amplified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using universal primers and sequenced. Multiple alignment of the ITS sequences and comparison with published sequences revealed very little intraspecific variation and a low interspecific polymorphism clustered in two regions. Species-specific PCR primers were designed to amplify a 356 bp fragment for each of the three species. The specificity of the three primer pairs was successfully tested with a collection of 17 M. laxa, 18 M. fructigena and 6 M. fructicola isolates collected from different hosts and different countries, unequivocally confirming the identification of each isolate based on morphological and cultural traits. Using stringent PCR conditions, no cross-reaction was observed with any of the isolates tested. The specificity of the PCR assays was also successfully confirmed with DNA extracted from different fungal species, either phylogenetically close to the genus Monilinia or commonly found on diseased fruits. Using this new reliable technique, doubtful isolates can be directly identified in a single PCR run. Moreover, detection and identification of the Monilinia species were successfully achieved directly on diseased fruits. This simple and rapid method can be particularly useful to detect M. fructicola which is a listed quarantine fungus in all European countries.

Monilinia laxa Monilinia fructigena Monilinia fructicola brown rot molecular identification species-specific primers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carbone I and Kohn LM (1993) Ribosomal DNA sequence divergence within Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 of the Sclerotiniaceae. Mycologia 85: 415–427Google Scholar
  2. Commonwealth Department of Health (1984) Brown rot of pome fruit. Plant Quarantine Leaflet No. 37. Camberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. Code of Federal Regulation (1996) Title 7 319.37–5. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA. Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Record Administration, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Corpet F (1988) Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucl Acids Res 16: 10881–10890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Cal A and Melgarejo P (1999) Effects of long-wave UV light on Monilinia growth and identification of species. Plant Dis 83: 62–65Google Scholar
  6. Directive du conseil 77/93/CEE du 21 décembre 1976 concernant les mesures de protection contre l'introduction dans les Etats Membres d'organismes nuisibles aux végétaux. Journal Offi-ciel des Communautés Européennes No. L26: 20–54Google Scholar
  7. Fulton CE and Brown AE (1997) Use of SSU rDNA group-I intron to distinguish Monilinia fructicola from M. laxa and M. fructigena. FEMS Microbiol Lett 157: 307–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fulton CE, Van Leeuwen GCM and Brown AE (1999) Genetic variation among and within Monilinia species causing brown rot of stone and pome fruits. Eur J Plant Pathol 105: 495–500Google Scholar
  9. Henrion B, Chevalier G and Martin F (1994) Typing truffle species by PCR amplification of the ribosomal DNA spacers. Mycol Res 98: 37–43Google Scholar
  10. Hewitt WB and Leach LD (1939) Brown-rot Sclerotinias occurring in California and their distribution on stone fruits. Phytopathology 29: 337–351Google Scholar
  11. Holst-Jensen A, Kohn LM, Jakobsen KS and Schumacher T (1997) Molecular phylogeny and evolution of Monilinia (Scerotiniaceae) based on coding and noncoding rDNA sequences. Am J Bot 84: 686–701Google Scholar
  12. Liew ECY, Maclean DJ and Irwin JAG (1998) Specific PCR based detection of Phytophthora medicaginis using the intergenic spacer region of the ribosomal DNA. Mycol Res 102: 73–80Google Scholar
  13. Nazar RN, Hu X, Schmidt J, Culham D and Robb J (1991) Potential use of PCR-amplified ribosomal intergenic sequences in the detection and differentiation of verticillium wilt pathogens. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 39: 1–11Google Scholar
  14. OEPP (1996) Distribution maps of Quarantine pests for Europe (Smith IM, Charles LMF) CAB international, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Penrose LJ (1990) Prolonged field persistence of resistance to benomyl in Monilinia fructicola. Crop Protect 9: 190–192Google Scholar
  16. Penrose LJ, Tarran J and Wong AL (1976) First record of Sclerotinia laxa Aderh. & Ruhl. in New South Wales: differentiation from S. fructicola (Wint.) Rehm. by cultural characteristics and electrophoresis. Aust J Agric Res 27: 547–556Google Scholar
  17. Ristaino JB, Madritch M, Trout CL and Parra G (1998) PCR amplification of ribosomal DNA for species identification in the plant pathogen genus Phytophthora. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 948–954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Snyder CL and Jones AL (1999) Genetic variation between strains of Monilinia fructicola and Monilinia laxa isolated from cherries in Michigan. Can J Plant Pathol 21: 70–77Google Scholar
  19. Sonoda RM, Ogawa JM and Manji BT (1982) Use of interactions of cultures to distinguish Monilinia laxa from M. fructicola. Plant Dis 66: 325–326Google Scholar
  20. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S and Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ and White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Method and Applications (pp 315–322) Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Willetts HJ (1969) Cultural characteristics of brown rot fungi (Sclerotinia spp.) Mycologia 61: 332–339PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renaud Ioos
    • 1
  • Pascal Frey
    • 2
  1. 1.Unité de Mycologie Agricole et ForestièreLNPVNancyFrance
  2. 2.Unité Ecosystèmes Forestiers, Equipe de Pathologie ForestièreINRAChampenouxFrance

Personalised recommendations