European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 77–85 | Cite as

Characteristics of Pestalotiopsis Associated with Hardy Ornamental Plants in the UK

  • K.E. Hopkins
  • M.P. McQuilken


Pestalotiopsis isolates obtained from the foliage, stem-base and roots of hardy ornamentals grown on commercial nurseries in the UK were identified and characterised according to pathogenicity and colony morphology. All 18 isolates were identified as Pestalotiopsis sydowiana on the basis of conidia morphology, and confirmation of identification was made by experts at CABI Bioscience. Isolates were pathogenic on the host from which originally isolated. Typical symptoms included foliar browning of foliage and stems, and the presence of black or greenish-black acervuli on diseased tissue. Isolates were not host specific and infected other species of hardy ornamentals. Three colony types on potato dextrose agar were distinguished according to colour and production of acervuli by individual isolates.

Three selected isolates of P. sydowiana were characterised by examining the effects of growth media, temperature, pH, and water potential on hyphal extension. Isolates grew well on commonly used growth media, including PDA, Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), V8 juice agar (V8), malt extract agar (MEA) and Czapek Dox agar (CDA). The optimum temperature for growth on PDA was in the range 20–25°C, with little or no growth occurring below 5°C or above 30°C. Hyphal extension occurred over a pH range between 2.6–8.6, with optimum values occurring at pH 5.5. In general, decreases in osmotic and matric potential caused a reduction in growth. Hyphal extension on media adjusted osmotically as NaCl ceased between −9.9 and −10.5 MPa. Isolates were more tolerant of osmotic than matric potential, with no growth occurring at −6.5 MPa on media adjusted with polyethylene glycol.

Pestalotiopsis sydowiana morphology pathogenicity ericaceous plants conifers temperature pH water potential 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adebayo AA and Harris RF (1971) Fungal growth responses to osmotic as compared to matric water potential. Soil Sci Soc America 35: 465–469Google Scholar
  2. Brownell KH and Schneider RW (1985) Roles of matric and osmotic components of water potential and their interactions with temperature in the growth of Fusarium oxysporum in synthetic medium and in soil. Phytopathology 75: 53–57Google Scholar
  3. Cook RJ and Duniway JM (1981) Water relations in the life cycles of soilborne plant pathogens. In: Parr JF, Gardner WR and Elliot LF (eds) Water Potential Relations in Soil Microbiology (pp 119–139) Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyier DL (1987) Leaf spots. In: Coyier AL and Roane MK (eds) Compendium of Rhododendron and Azalea Diseases (pp 25–26) The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Coyier DL and Roane MK (1987) Compendium of Rhododendron and Azalea Diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Duniway JM (1979) Water relations of water molds. Ann Rev Phytopathol 17: 431–460Google Scholar
  7. Foster LM, Kozak KR, Loftus MG, Stevens JJ and Ross IK (1993) The polymerase chain reaction and its application to filamentous fungi. Mycol Res 97: 769–781Google Scholar
  8. Gomori G (1955) Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Meth Enzym 1: 138–146Google Scholar
  9. Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC and Pegler DN (1995) Ainsworth ; Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi (Eighth Edition). CAB International, Egham, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Handreck KA and Black ND (1994) Growing Media for Ornamental Plants and Turf Culture. University of New South Wales Press, Randwick, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  11. Hopkins KE (1996) Aspects of the biology and control of Pestalotiopsis on hardy ornamental nursery stock. MSc thesis, University of Glasgow, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins KE and McQuilken MP (1997) Pestalotiopsis on nursery stock. In: Graham M (ed) HDC Project News No. 39 (p 6) Horticultural Development Council, East MallingGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyun J-W and Clark CA (1998) Analysis of Fusarium lateritium using RAPD and rDNA RFLP techniques. Mycol Res 102: 1259–1264Google Scholar
  14. Jorge-Silva ML, Rodrigues ML, Ferraz JFP and Ricardo CPP (1989) Effect of water availability on growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis and on host parasite relations. Mycol Res 92: 157–161Google Scholar
  15. Lang ARG (1967) Osmotic coefficients and water potentials of sodium chloride solutions from 0-40 oC. Aust J Chem 20: 2017–2023Google Scholar
  16. LoBuglio KF, Pitt JI and Taylor JW (1994) Independent origins of the synnematous Penicillium species, P. duclauxii, P. clavigerum and P. vulpinum, as assessed by two ribosomal DNA regions. Mycol Res 98: 250–256Google Scholar
  17. Martin MP, Högberg N and Nylund J-E (1998) Molecular analysis confirms morphological reclassification of Rhizopogon. Mycol Res 102: 855–858Google Scholar
  18. Matthew J, Hawke BG and Pankhurst CE (1995) A DNA probe for identification of Pythium irregulare in soil. Mycol Res 99: 579–584Google Scholar
  19. Meng XQ, Shoemaker RC and Yang XB (1999) Analysis of pathogenicity and genetic variation among Phytophthora sojae isolates using RAPD. Mycol Res 103: 173–178Google Scholar
  20. Michel BE and Kaufmann MR (1973) The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Pl Physiol 51: 914–916Google Scholar
  21. Mordue JEM (1971) Pestalotiopsis guepini. CMI Descriptions of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria No. 320. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Pirone PP (1978) Diseases and Pests of Ornamental Plants. Wiley Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Raynor RW (1970) A Mycological Colour Chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Slayter RD (1967) Plant Water Relationships. Academic Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Steuter AA, Mozafar A and Goodin JR (1981) Water potential of aqueous polyethylene glycol. Pl Physiol 67: 64–67Google Scholar
  26. Sutton BC (1961) Coelomycetes I. Mycol Pap 80: 14–15Google Scholar
  27. Sutton BC (1980) The Coelomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Vegh I and LeBerre A (1992) Étude de quelques champignons rencontr´es sur ligneux d'ornement. Phytoma-La defense des végétaux 435: 66–68Google Scholar
  29. White RP (1930) Pathogenicity of Pestalotia spp. on rhododendron. Phytopathology 20: 85–91Google Scholar
  30. Woods DM and Duniway JM (1986) Some effects of water potential on growth, turgor and respiration of Phytophthora cryptogea and Fusarium moniliforme. Phytopathology 76: 1248–1253Google Scholar
  31. Zimand G, Valinsky L, Elad Y, Chet I and Manulis S (1994) Use of the RAPD procedure for the identification of Trichoderma strains. Mycol Res 98: 531–534Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.E. Hopkins
    • 1
  • M.P. McQuilken
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyThe Scottish Agricultural CollegeAuchincruive, AyrScotland UK
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologyThe Scottish Agricultural CollegeAuchincruive, Ayr

Personalised recommendations