Information Systems that Really Support Decision-Making

  • Gio Wiederhold
Article

Abstract

Decision makers are expected to make decisions which have a positive effect on the future of their enterprises. We expect that intelligent information systems support their activities. Today, databases and web-based resources, accessed through effective communications, make information about the past rapidly available. To project the future the decision makers either have to use intuition or employ tool for prediction, and initialize such tools with information obtained from an information system to such tools. An effective information system should integrate forecasting the future, and because there choices have been made, such a system must also support the comparative assessment of the effects of alternate decisions. The complexity of an information system handling the past, and multiple futures will be great, and must be modularized with effective interfaces. We recommend the use of an SQL-like interface language to access existing tools to assess the future, as spreadsheets and simulations. Making results of simulations accessible as another contribution to integrated information systems has the potential of greatly augmenting their effectiveness and really support decision-making.

decision-support information systems simulation prediction interfaces 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aberle, D., Dionisio, J., McNitt-Gray, M., Taira, R., Cardenas, A., Goldin, J., Bown, K., Figlin, R., and Chu, W. (1996). Integrated Multimedia Timeline of Medical Images and Data for Thoracic Oncology Patients, Imaging and Therapeutic Technology, 16(3), 669–681.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar and Kanal, L.N. (1986). Handling Uncertain Information: A Review of Numeric and Non-numeric Methods. In Kanal and Lemmer (Eds.), Uncertainty in AI. North-Holland Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Connolly, D. (Ed.) (1997). XML: Principles, Tools, and Techniques. O'Reilly.Google Scholar
  4. Das, A.K., Shahar, Y., Tu, S.W., and Musen, M.A. (1994). A Temporal-Abstraction Mediator for Protocol-Based Decision Support. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medicine, Washington DC (pp. 320–324).Google Scholar
  5. Date, C.J. and Darwen, H. (1993). A Guide to the SQL Standard, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. DeZegher-Geets, I., Freeman, A.G., Walker, M.G., Blum, R.L., and Wiederhold, G. (1988). Summarization and Display of On-Line Medical Records, M.D. Computing, 5(3), 38–46.Google Scholar
  7. Fishwick, P. and Hill, D. (Eds.) (1998). 1998 International Conference on Web-Based Modeling & Simulation. Society for Computer Simulation. http://www.cis.ufl.edu/»fishwick/webconf.html.Google Scholar
  8. GarciaMolina, H., Barbara, D., and Porter, D. (1992). The Management of Probabilistic Data, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 4(5), 487–502.Google Scholar
  9. Hammer, J., Breunig, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Nestorov, S., Vassalos, V., and Yerneni, R. (1997). Template-Based Wrappers in the TSIMMIS System, ACM Sigmod.Google Scholar
  10. Healy, K. and Kilgore, R. (1997). SILK, a JAVA-Based Simulation Process Language. In Proc. of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta GA (pp. 475–482).Google Scholar
  11. IEEE (1998). P1561, Draft IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA).Google Scholar
  12. Jiang, R. (1996). Report on the SimQL project; submitted to Prof. Wiederhold, CSD Stanford.Google Scholar
  13. Kimball, R. (1996). The Data Warehouse. Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Linden, T. and Gaw, D. (1992). JIGSAW: Preference-Directed, Co-Operative Scheduling. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Practical Approaches to Scheduling and Planning.Google Scholar
  15. McCall, G. (Ed.) (1996). New World Vistas, Air and Space Power for the 21st Century (p. 9). Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. Information Technology Volume.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, G. (1956). The Magical Number Seven ± Two. Psych. Review, 68, 81–97.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, J., Srila, A., and Xiang, X. (1999). The JSIM Web-based Simulation Environment. In Future Computer Systems. North-Holland: Elseviers.Google Scholar
  18. Orsborn, K. (1994). Applying Next Generation Object-Oriented DBMS for Finite Element Analysis. In Litwind Risch (Ed.), Applications of Database, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 819. Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan-Kaufman.Google Scholar
  20. Sandewall, E. and Backstrom, C. (Eds.) (1994). Current Trends in AI Planning. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  21. Singhal, S. (1996). Effective Remote Modeling in Large-Scale Distributed Interactive Simulation Environments. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford CSD.Google Scholar
  22. Tate, A., Drabble, B., and Kirby, R. (1992). O-Plan 2: the Open Planning Architecture. In AAAI Spring Symposium.Google Scholar
  23. Van Dieren, W. (Ed.) (1995). Taking Nature Into Account: A Report to the Club of Rome. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Wiederhold, G. (1992). Mediators in the Architecture of Future Information Systems, IEEE Computer, 25(3), 38–49.Google Scholar
  25. Wiederhold, G. and Genesereth, M. (1997). The Conceptual Basis for Mediation Services, IEEE Expert, Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 12(5).Google Scholar
  26. Wiederhold, G., Jiang, R., and Garcia-Molina, H. (1998). An Interface for Projecting CoAs in Support of C2. In Proc.1998 Command & Control Research & Technology Symposium, Naval Postgraduate School (pp. 549–558).Google Scholar
  27. Zyda, M. (Chair) (1997). Modeling and Simulation, Linking Entertainment and Defense. Committee on Modeling and Simulation, National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gio Wiederhold
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations