Science & Education

, Volume 10, Issue 1–2, pp 119–135 | Cite as

Methodology and Politics in Science: The Fate of Huygens' 1673 Proposal of the Seconds Pendulum as an International Standard of Length and Some Educational Suggestions

  • Michael R. Matthews
Article

Abstract

This paper is part of a larger work on the history, philosophy and utilisation of pendulum motion studies (Matthews 2000). The paper deals with the fate of Christiaan Huygens 1673 proposal to use the length of a seconds pendulum (effectively one metre) as a universal, natural and objective standard of length. This is something which, if it had been adopted, would have been of inestimable scientific, commercial and cultural benefit. Why it was not originally adopted in the late seventeenth century, and why it was again rejected in the late eighteenth century (1795) when the Revolutionary Assembly in France adopted the metric system with the metre being defined as one ten-millionth of the quarter meridan distance – raise interesting questions about the methodology and politics of science. Given that pendulum motion is a standard component of all science courses throughout the world, and given that most science education reforms, including the US National Science Education Standards and recent Australian state reforms, require that something of the ‘big picture’ of science be conveyed to students (the relationship of science to culture, commerce, history and philosophy) – it is suggested that these educational goals can be advanced by teaching about the fate of Huygens' proposal.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alder, K.: 1995, ‘A Revolution to Measure: The Political Economy of the Metric System in France’, in M.N. Wise (ed.), The Values of Precision, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 39–71.Google Scholar
  2. Andrewes, W.J.H. (ed.): 1998, The Quest for Longitude: The Proceedings of the Longitude Symposium, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 4–6, 1993, Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Ariotti, P.E.: 1972, ‘Aspects of the Conception and Development of the Pendulum in the 17th Century’, Archive for History of the Exact Sciences 8, 329–410.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A.E.: 1947, Christiaan Huygens and the Development of Science in the Seventeenth Century, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  5. Berriman, A.E.: 1953, Historical Metrology: A New Analysis of the Archaelogical and Historical Evidence Relating to Weights and Measures, J.M. Dent & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  6. Blay, M.: 1998, Reasoning with the Infinite: From the Closed World to the Mathematical Universe, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Bos, H.J.M.: 1980a, ‘Christiaan Huygens — A Biographical Sketch’, in H.J.M. Bos et al. (eds), Studies on Christiaan Huygens, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp. 7–18.Google Scholar
  8. Bybee, R.W., Ellis, J.D, Giese, J.R. & Parisi, L.: 1992, Teaching About the History and Nature of Science and Technology: A Curriculum Framework, BSCS/SSEC, Colorado Springs.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, A.: 1998, Edmond Halley: Charting the Heavens and the Seas, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson, R.D.: 1985, ‘Galileo Galilei and Christiaan Huygens', Antiquarian Horology 15, 261–270.Google Scholar
  11. Duhem, P.: 1916/1991, German Science, trans. J. Lyon and S.L. Jaki, Open Court Publishers, La Salle IL.Google Scholar
  12. Edwardes, E.L.: 1977, The Story of the Pendulum Clock, J. Sherratt, Altrincham.Google Scholar
  13. Fauvel, J. & Gray, J. (eds): 1987, The History of Mathematics: A Reader, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  14. Gould, R. T.: 1923, The Marine Chronometer, Its History and Development, J.D. Potter, London. Reprinted by The Holland Press, London, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. Heilbron, J.L.: 1986, The Dilemmas of an Upright Man: Max Planck as Spokesman for German Science, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  16. Heilbron, J.L.: 1989, ‘The Politics of the Meter Stick’, American Journal of Physics 57, 988–992.Google Scholar
  17. Huygens, C.: 1673/1986, Horologium Oscillatorium. The Pendulum Clock or Geometrical Demonstrations Concerning the Motion of Fpendula as Applied to Clocks, R.J. Blackwell, trans., Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  18. Huygens, C.: 1690/1945, Treatise on Light, translated and edited by S.P. Thompson, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. Kline, H.A.: 1988, The Science of Measurement: A Historical Survey, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Kula, W.: 1986, Measures and Man, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Landes, D.S.: 1998, ‘Finding the Point at Sea’, in W.J.H. Andrewes (ed.), The Quest for Longitude, The Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2nd Edition, pp. 20–30.Google Scholar
  22. Mahoney, M.S.: 1980, ‘Christiaan Huygens: The Measurement of Time and of Longitude at Sea’, in H.J.M. Bos et al. (eds), Studies on Christiaan Huygens, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp. 234–270.Google Scholar
  23. Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, M.R.: 1998, ‘How History and Philosophy in the US Science Education Standards Could Have Promoted Multidisciplinary Teaching’, School Science and Mathematics 98(6), 285–293.Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, M.R.: 2000, Time for Science Education: How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion can Contribute to Science Literacy, Plenum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  26. McComas, W.F. & Olsen, J.K.: 1998, ‘The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents’, in W.F. McComas (ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education:Rationales and Strategies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
  27. McComas, W.F., Clough, M.P. & Almazroa, H.: 1998, ‘The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education’, Science & Education 7(6), 511–532.Google Scholar
  28. NRC (National Research Council): 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  29. Olmsted, J.W.: 1942, ‘The Scientific Expedition of Jean Richer to Cayenne (1672–1673)’, Isis 34, 117–128.Google Scholar
  30. Petry, M.J.: 1993, ‘Classifying the Motion: Hegel on the Pendulum’, in M.J. Petry (ed.), Hegel and Newtonism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 291–316.Google Scholar
  31. Scarr, A.J.T.: 1967, Metrology and Precision Engineering, McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  32. Sobel, D.: 1995, Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time, Walker & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  33. Stimson, A.: 1998, ‘The Longitude Problem: The Navigator's Story’, in W.J.H. Andrewes (ed.), The Quest for Longitude, The Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, 2nd ed., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, pp. 72–84.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, E.P.: 1967, ‘Time, Work-Discipline and Industrial Capitalism’, Past and Present 38, 56–97.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, J.E.D.: 1992, From Sails to Satellites: The Origins and Development of Navigational Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Yoder, J.G.: 1988, Unrolling Time: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematization of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Matthews
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia; E-mail

Personalised recommendations