Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 245–250

Factors influencing the detection rate of drug‐related problems in community pharmacy

  • T. Westerlund
  • A.B. Almarsdóttir
  • A. Melander
Article

Abstract

This study analyzes relationships between the number of drug‐related problems detected in community pharmacy practice and the educational level and other characteristics of pharmacy personnel and their work sites. Random samples of pharmacists, prescriptionists and pharmacy technicians were drawn nationwide in Sweden. One hundred and forty‐four (63%) of those meeting the inclusion criteria agreed to take part. The participants documented medication‐related problems, interventions and patient variables on a data collection form. The drug‐related problems were weighted by the number of patients served by each professional. The regression analysis showed the educational level of the professional to have a statistically significant effect on the detection rate, with pharmacists finding on average 2.5 more drug‐related problems per 100 patients than prescriptionists and about 3.6 more than technicians. Previous participation in a study or activity on drug‐related problems and the size of the pharmacy also had statistically significant effects on the problem detection rate. The use of open‐ended questions to create a dialogue with the patient seemed to be a successful means to discover problems. The results of this study indicate the importance of education and training of pharmacy personnel in detection of drug‐related problems. This finding speaks in favor of increasing the pharmacist to other personnel ratio, provided the higher costs will be offset by societal benefits.

Community pharmacy personnel Counselor Role Orientation Documentation Drug‐related problems Drug therapy problems Education Job satisfaction Open‐ended questions Pharmaceutical care Sweden 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Pharmaceutical care practice. McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, 1998:79.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berardo DH, Kimberlin CL, McKenzie LC, Pendergast JF. Community pharmacists' documentation of intervention on drug related problems of elderly patients. J Soc Adm Pharm 1994;11:182-193.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tindall WN, Beardsley RS, Kimberlin CL. Communication skills in pharmacy practice. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cipolle RJ, Strand LM, Morley PC. Pharmaceutical care practice. McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, 1998:247-248.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meldrum H. Interpersonal communication in pharmaceutical care. Pharmaceutical Products Press, an imprint of the Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY, 1994:28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-543.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strand LM, Morley PC, Cipolle RJ et al. Drug-related problems: their structure and function. Ann Pharmacotherap 1990;24:1093-1097.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Segal R. Therapeutic outcomes monitoring: a method for implementing pharmaceutical care. In Escovitz A, Pathak DS. ed. Health outcomes and pharmaceutical care: measurement, applications, and initiatives. Pharmaceutical Products Press, an imprint of the Haworth Press, Inc., 1996:194.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westerlund T. LRP-PROJEKTET – en svensk riksstudie i farmacevtisk omsorg om läkemedelsrelaterade problem hos apotekskunder. [The DRP-PROJECT – a Swedish national study in pharmaceutical care on drug-related problems among pharmacy patients]. Internal report, Apoteksbolaget AB, Stockholm, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westerlund T, Almarsdóttir AB, Melander A. Drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions in community practice. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:40-50.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mason HL. The pharmacists' medication counseling role: Attitudes and behavior of community practitioners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin Madison, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pendergast JF, Kimberlin CL, Berardo DH, McKenzie LC. Role orientation and community pharmacists' participation in a project to improve patient care. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40:557-565.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornell C. A second generation of multivariate analysis: classification of methods and implications for marketing research. In: M. Houston (ed.), Review of Marketing 1987:407-450.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ArbetsTillfredsställelseIndex (ATI) [Work Satisfaction Index questionnaire], Apoteksbolaget AB, Stockholm, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Armitage & Berry. Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford, 1987:207.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alafris A, Desselle SP. The influence of education on the counselor role orientations and behaviors of community pharmacists. In Annual Meeting Abstracts of JAPhA 1998;38:270.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hyman H. Interviewing in social research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1954.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Westerlund
  • A.B. Almarsdóttir
  • A. Melander

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations