Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 47, Issue 5, pp 561–568 | Cite as

Genetic diversity within and among landraces of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under farmer management in West Africa

  • Carlos S. Busso
  • Katrien M. Devos
  • Gavin Ross
  • Michael Mortimore
  • William M. Adams
  • Michael J. Ambrose
  • Sharon Alldrick
  • Michael D. Gale

Abstract

The influence of farmer management on pearl millet landrace diversity was determined by evaluating variation in individual farmers' populations from two villages in north-eastern Nigeria. The variability within and between landrace samples was estimated using variation at 163 amplified fragment length polymorphism marker (AFLP) loci. The data indicated that individual farmers' husbandry practices result in the isolation of their own group of ideotypes each in their own unique genetic backgrounds, thereby rendering landrace names inappropriate as indicators of a generic genetic identity. The implications of these findings for sampling strategies for genebanks and regional genetic evaluations are discussed.

AFLP genebanks genetic diversity landraces molecular markers pearl millet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, W.M., 1990. Green development: environment and sustainability in the Third World. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose, M.J., 1994. The role of gene banks in dealing with exotic germplasm and its development. J. Swedish Seed Assoc. 104: 195-200.Google Scholar
  3. Brunken, J.N., 1977. A systematic study of Pennisetum Sect. Pennisetum (Graminae). Am. J. Bot. 64: 161-176.Google Scholar
  4. Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando & R.H. Booth, 1996. International breeding programmes and resource-poor farmers: Crop improvement in difficult environments. In: Eyzaguirre, P. & Iwanaga, M. (Eds.), Participatory plant breeding. Proceeding of a workshop on participatory plant breeding, 26-29 July 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 99-116, IPGRI, Rome and ICARDA, Aleppo.Google Scholar
  5. Chatfield, C. & A.J. Collins, 1980. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London & New York.Google Scholar
  6. Cromwell, E., 1996. Governments, farmers and seeds in a changing Africa. Overseas Development Institute with CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  7. Hulme, M., 1997. Global warming. Progress in Physical Geography 21: 446-453.Google Scholar
  8. Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1995. Farmer participatory research for the selection of rainfed rice cultivars. International Rice Research Institute, International Rice Conference, 13-17 February, 1995. Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
  9. Knüpffer, H., 1989. Identification of duplicates in the European Barley Database. In: Report of a Working Group on Barley (Third Meeting). pp. 22-43, IPGRI, Rome.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, C.J., J.R. Witcombe, T.S. Pittaway, M. Nash, C.T. Hash & M.D. Gale, 1992. Restriction fragment length polymorphism in pearl millet, Pennisetum glaucum. In: Mounolou, J.C. & Sarr, A. (Eds.), Complexes d'espèces, flux de gènes et ressources génétiques des plantes. Colloque international, 8-10 janvier, pp. 233-241, Publications du Bureau des Ressources Génétiques, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Ouendeba, B., G. Ejeta, W.W. Hanna & A.K. Kumar, 1995. Diversity among African pearl millet landrace populations. Crop Sci. 35: 919-924.Google Scholar
  12. Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1995. AFLPTM Plant Mapping. Protocols. Pat 402083. Revision B. Applied Biosystems, a Division of Perkin-Elmer.Google Scholar
  13. Pilat-Andre, J.S., F. Lamy & A. Sarr, 1992. Etude de la région Adh du mil (Pennisetum typhoides) par utilisation des techniques RFLP. In: Mounolou, J.C. & Sarr, A. (Eds.), Complexes d'espèces, flux de gènes et ressources génétiques des plantes. Colloque international, 8-10 janvier, 1992, pp. 58-71. Publications du Bureau des Ressources Génétiques, Paris.Google Scholar
  14. Sedogo, M.C. & S. Tostain, 1996. Diversité enzymatique des mils cultivés (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) du Burkina Faso. Plant Gen. Res. Newslett. 105: 8-14.Google Scholar
  15. Singh, S.P., 1987. Genetic divergence over environments in pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides Stapf & Hubb.). Genetica Agraria 42: 35-41.Google Scholar
  16. Tilman, D., D. Wedin & J. Knops, 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379: 718-720.Google Scholar
  17. Tilman, D., 1996. Biodiversity: Population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77: 350-363.Google Scholar
  18. Tostain, S., M.F. Riandey & L. Marchais, 1987. Enzyme diversity in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 188-193.Google Scholar
  19. van Hintum, T.J.L. & H. Knüpffer, 1995. Duplication within and between collections. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 42: 127-133.Google Scholar
  20. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hormes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Paleman, M. Kuiper & M. Zabeau, 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.Google Scholar
  21. Wilson, J.P., G.W. Burton, J.D. Zongo & I.O. Dicko, 1990. Diversity among pearl millet landraces collected in central Burkina Faso. Crop Sci. 30: 40-43.Google Scholar
  22. Zeven, A.C., 1998. Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127-139.Google Scholar
  23. Zongo, J.D., M.C. Sedogo, P. Sereme & G.R. Zangre, 1988. Synthèse des prospections du mil (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.) au Burkina Faso. In: Fussell L.K. & Werder J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Regional PearlMillet ImprovementWorkshop, 15-19 August 1988, pp. 121-131. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos S. Busso
  • Katrien M. Devos
  • Gavin Ross
  • Michael Mortimore
  • William M. Adams
  • Michael J. Ambrose
  • Sharon Alldrick
  • Michael D. Gale

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations