Private Policing in Context

  • Les Johnston
Article

Abstract

This article considers the development, growth and significance of private policing in a wider context. Section one suggests that the rebirth of private policing is associated with - and, in effect, demands - a change in the conceptual framework with which policing is analysed. While section one addresses the conceptual context of private policing, section two examines its theoretical context by considering various explanations for the post-war growth of commercial security. Moving from specific to general accounts, it is suggested that two explanations - one based upon sociological accounts of the development of modern societies, the other on genealogical accounts of developing ‘mentalities’ - provide a crucial context for understanding contemporary changes in policing and governance. In the next section, two of these changes - the growing influence of risk-based policing and the increasing significance of diverse patterns of governance - are considered in the context of the fragmented forms of security provision (commercial, municipal, civil and state policing) which are prevalent today. A short concluding section offers some ‘final thoughts’ on how these arguments impact on the governance of policing. One of the implications contained in this article is that the re-emergence of private policing needs to be considered not only as a problem, but also as an opportunity to identify and address critical questions of contemporary governance.

governance policing private security risk society security policy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayley, D.H. and C.D. Shearing, The future of policing, Law and Society Review, 30(3), pp. 585–606, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Bergalli, R. and C. Sumner (Eds), Social Control and Political Order. London: Sage, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Bottoms, A. and P. Wiles, Understanding crime prevention in late modern societies. In: T. Bennett (Ed), Preventing Crime and Disorder: Targeting Strategies and Responsibilities, pp. 1–42. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Brearley, N. and M. King, Policing, social protest: Some indicators of change. In: C. Critcher and D. Waddington (Eds), Policing Public Order: Theoretical and Practical Issues, pp. 101–116. Aldershot: Avebury, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Brodeur, J.P., High policing and low policing: Remarks about the policing of political activities, Social Problems, 30, pp. 507–520, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. Business Wire, Pinkerton names McCormick Senior Managing Director, Business Risks International. URL: http://www.businesswire.com, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. Castel, R., From dangerousness to risk. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (Eds), The Foucault Effect, pp. 251–280. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, S., Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. Cope, S., F. Leishman and P. Starie, Hollowing-out and hiving-off: Reinventing policing in Britain. In: J. Lovenduski and J. Stanyer (Eds), Contemporary Political Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 552–565. Belfast: Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Crook, S., J. Pakulski and M. Waters (Eds), Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society. London: Sage, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, W.C. and T. Taylor, Private Security and Police in America: The Hallcrest Report I. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. De Waard, J., The private security sector in fifteen European countries: Size, rules and legislation. Security Journal, 4(2), pp. 58–63, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. De Waard, J., The private security industry in international perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), pp. 143–174, 1999 (this issue).Google Scholar
  15. De Waard, J.J. and J. van der Hoek, Private Security: Size of Sector and Legislation in the Netherlands and Europe. The Hague: Department of Crime Prevention, Ministry of Justice, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E., The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. Ericson, R. and K. Haggerty, The population of police. Paper presented to the Joint Meeting of the American Law and Society Association and the Research Committee on the Sociology of Law of the International Sociological Association, Glasgow, July 10–13, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Ewald, F., Insurance and risk. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (Eds), The Foucault Effect, pp. 197–210. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Executive Outcomes, http://www.eo.com/about.html, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane, 1977.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M., Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (Eds), The Foucault Effect, pp. 87–104. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. Garrett, A., When rising crime equals rising profits. The Observer, 8 June 1997.Google Scholar
  23. George, B. and M. Button, Private security industry regulation: Lessons from abroad for the United Kingdom. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 1(2), pp. 109–121, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. George, B. and M. Button, Too little too late? An assessment of recent proposals for the private security industry in the United Kingdom. Security Journal 10(1), pp. 1–7, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbons, S., Change to criminal investigation planned to save time and money. Police Review, p. 4, 23 August 1996.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbons, S. and K. Hyder, MI5 crime-fighting role needs tighter control says Sharples. Police Review, p. 5, 19 January 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  28. Hauber, A., B. Hofstra, L. Toornvliet and A. Zandbergen, Some new forms of functional social control in the Netherlands and their effects. British Journal of Criminology, 36(2), pp. 199–219, 1996.Google Scholar
  29. Hesseling, R.B.P., Functional surveillance in the Netherlands: Exemplary projects. Security Journal 6(1), pp. 21–25, 1995.Google Scholar
  30. Hoogenboom, A.B., Grey policing: A theoretical framework. Policing and Society 2(1), pp. 17–30, 1991.Google Scholar
  31. Hoover, Company Profiles: Wackenhut http: //www.pathfinder.com/money/hoovers/corpdirectoryplus /w/wak.html, 1998.Google Scholar
  32. House of Commons, First report of the Home Affairs Committee Session 1994–5. The Private Security Industry, Vol. 1, HC 17–1, London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
  33. Illich, I., Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. London: Marion Boyars, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Jessop, B., Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40, pp. 7–39, 1993.Google Scholar
  35. Johnston, L., The Rebirth of Private Policing. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  36. Johnston, L., Privatization and protection: Spatial and sectoral ideologies in British policing and crime prevention. Modern Law Review 56(6), pp. 771–92, 1993.Google Scholar
  37. Johnston, L., What is vigilantism? British Journal of Criminology 36(2), pp. 220–236, 1996.Google Scholar
  38. Johnston, L., Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance. London: Longman, forthcoming [a].Google Scholar
  39. Johnston, L., Transnational commercial security. In: J. Sheptycki (Ed.), Issues in Transnational Policing. London: Routledge, forthcoming [b].Google Scholar
  40. Jones, T. and T. Newburn, The regulation and control of the private security industry. In: W. Saulsbury, J. Mott and T. Newburn (Eds), Themes in Contemporary Policing, pp. 105–119. London: Independent Committee of Inquiry into the Roles and Responsibilities of the Police, 1996.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, T. and T. Newburn, Private Security and Public Policing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. Jordan & Sons Ltd., Britain's Security Industry. London: Jordan & Sons, 1991.Google Scholar
  43. Kakalik, J.S. and S. Wildhorn, Private Police in the United States. National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice: US Department of Justice. 4 volumes, 1971.Google Scholar
  44. Kania, R.E., The French municipal police experiment. Police Studies 12(3), pp. 125–131, 1989.Google Scholar
  45. Keegan, J., Private armies are a far cry from the sixties dogs of war. Electronic Telegraph, Issue 1083, 13 May 1998.Google Scholar
  46. Kempa, M., R. Carrier, J. Wood and C. Shearing, Reflections on the evolving concept of 'private policing'. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), pp. 197–223, 1999 (this issue).Google Scholar
  47. Klockars, C.B., The Dirty Harry problem. The Annals, 452, pp. 33–47, 1980.Google Scholar
  48. Lilley, J.R. and P. Knepper, An international perspective on the privatization of corrections. The Howard Journal, 31(3), pp. 174–191, 1992.Google Scholar
  49. Marx, G., Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  50. Ministerie van Justitie, Society and Crime: A Policy Plan for the Netherlands. The Hague: Ministry of Justice, 1985.Google Scholar
  51. MPRI, Company Info. Http://www.mpri.com/about/index.html, 1998.Google Scholar
  52. Nalla, M. and G. Newman, A Primer in Private Security. New York: Harrow and Heston, 1990.Google Scholar
  53. Narayan, S., The West European market for security products and services. International Security Review, Winter, pp. 28–29, 1994.Google Scholar
  54. National Police Agency, White Paper on Police 1994 (Excerpt). Tokyo: National Police Agency, Government of Japan, 1994.Google Scholar
  55. O'Malley, P. and D. Palmer, Post-Keynesian policing. Economy and Society, 25(2), pp. 137–155, 1996.Google Scholar
  56. Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing Government. New York: Plume, 1993.Google Scholar
  57. Parsons, T., Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review 29(3), pp. 339–357, 1964.Google Scholar
  58. Police Review, Fifty-five per cent favour private patrols. 6 August 1993.Google Scholar
  59. Reiner, R., Policing and the police. In: M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, pp. 997–1049. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  60. Rhodes, R., The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public services in Britain. Political Quarterly, 65(2), pp. 138–151, 1994.Google Scholar
  61. Rose, N., The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), pp. 327–356, 1996.Google Scholar
  62. Scull, A., Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant: A Radical View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  63. Seceurop, http://easyweb.easynet.co.uk/~pycroft/index.html, 1998.Google Scholar
  64. Shearing, C.D., The relation between public and private policing. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds), Modern Policing: Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 15, pp. 399–434. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  65. Shearing, C.D., Public and private policing. In: W. Saulsbury, J. Mott and T. Newburn (Eds), Themes in Contemporary Policing, pp. 83–95. London: Independent Committee of Inquiry into the Roles and Responsibilities of the Police, 1996.Google Scholar
  66. Shearing, C.D. and P.C. Stenning, Modern private security: Its growth and implications. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 3, pp. 193–245. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  67. Shearing, C.D. and P.C. Stenning (Eds), Private Policing. California: Sage, 1987.Google Scholar
  68. Simon, J., The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law and Society Review, 22, p. 772, 1988.Google Scholar
  69. South, N., Policing for Profit. London: Sage, 1988.Google Scholar
  70. Spitzer, S., Security and control in capitalist societies: The fetishism of security and the secret thereof. In: J. Lowman, R.J. Menzies and T.S. Palys (Eds), Transcarceration: Essays in the Sociology of Social Control, pp. 43–58. Aldershot: Gower, 1987.Google Scholar
  71. Spitzer, S. and A. Scull, Privatization and capitalist development: the case of the private police. Social Problems, 25(1), pp. 18–29, 1977.Google Scholar
  72. Stephens, M. and S. Becker (Eds), Police Force Police Service. London: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar
  73. Trickett, A., D. Elligworth, T. Hope and K. Pease, Victimization in the eighties: Changes in area and regional inequality. British Journal of Criminology, 35(3), pp. 343–359, 1995.Google Scholar
  74. Vidal, J., The bypass of justice. The Guardian, 9 April 1996.Google Scholar
  75. Wackenhut Corporation, Annual Report. March 1998.Google Scholar
  76. Waters, M., Globalization. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  77. Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Les Johnston
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Human StudiesUniversity of TeessideMiddlesboroughUK

Personalised recommendations