Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 455–459 | Cite as

RFLP markers are an effective tool for the identification of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) cultivars

  • Maria Eugenia Caceres
  • Fulvio Pupilli
  • Efisio Piano
  • Sergio Arcioni
Article

Abstract

The potential use of RFLP molecular markers for the identification of four creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) cultivars and one variety of A. tenuis Sibth. used as control, was investigated. Seven probes out of the total 44 screened were able to differentiate all five cultivars at once. On the basis of their genetic similarity the varieties bred at the Pennsylvania State University were grouped closely together, whereas the variety Prominent and the A. tenuis control were more distantly related.

Agrostis stoloniferaL. cultivar identification RFLP turfgrass 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Freeman, G.W., C.A. Wagg & M.M. Mileva, 1996. Identification of turfgrass cultivars using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Seed Sci. Technol. 24: 495–504.Google Scholar
  2. Freeman, G.W. & F.A. Yoder Jr., 1988. Electrophoresis of esterases to identify bentgrass cultivars. J. Seed Technol. 12: 120–126.Google Scholar
  3. Golembiewski, R.C., T.K. Danneberger & P.M. Sweeney, 1997. Potential of RAPD markers for use in the identification of creeping bentgrass cultivars. Crop Sci. 37: 212–214.Google Scholar
  4. Hitchcock, A.S., 1951. Manual of the Grasses of the United States. USDA Misc. Publ. 200. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Jones, T.W.A., 1983. Instability during storage of phosphoglucoisomerase isoenzyme from ryegrass (Lolium spp.). Physiol. Plant. 58: 136–140.Google Scholar
  6. Maniatis, A., E.F. Fritsch & J. Sambrook, 1982. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Moore, S.R., K.M. Devos, Z. Wang & M.D. Gale, 1995. Cereal genome evolution, grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr. Biol. 7: 737–739.Google Scholar
  8. Nagamura, Y., B.A. Antonio & T. Sasaki, 1997. Rice molecular genetic map using RFLPs and its applications. Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 79–87.Google Scholar
  9. Nei, M. & W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5267–5273.Google Scholar
  10. Pupilli, F., M.E. Caceres, C.L. Quarin & S. Arcioni, 1997. Segregation analysis of RFLP markers reveals a tetrasomic inheritance in apomictic Paspalum simplex. Genome 40: 822–828.Google Scholar
  11. Rohlf, F.J., 1993. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Applied Biostatistics, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Warnke, S.E., D.S. Douches & B.E. Branham, 1997. Relationships among creeping bentgrass cultivars based on isozyme polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 37: 203–207.Google Scholar
  13. Wilkinson, J.F. & J.B. Beard, 1972. Electrophoretic identification of Agrostis palustris and Poa pratensis cultivars. Crop Sci. 12: 833–834.Google Scholar
  14. Yamamoto, I. & J.M. Duich, 1994. Electrophoretic identification of cross-pollinated bentgrass species and cultivars. Crop Sci. 34: 792–798.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Eugenia Caceres
    • 1
  • Fulvio Pupilli
    • 2
  • Efisio Piano
    • 3
  • Sergio Arcioni
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Ricerche sul Miglioramento Genetico delle Piante Foraggere del CNRPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Ricerche sul Miglioramento Genetico delle Piante Foraggere del CNRPerugiaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture ForaggereLodiItaly

Personalised recommendations