An Evaluation of the Use of Videotaped Evidence for Juvenile Witnesses in Criminal Courts in England and Wales

  • J.C. Wilson
  • G.M. Davies
Article

Abstract

For the first time, the UK Criminal Justice Act (1991) allowed the videotaped evidence of a child to be substituted for the child's evidence-in-chief in a criminal court. The present study is an evaluation of that legislation. One hundred and fifty children were observed testifying in a criminal court in the UK. The use of the videotaped evidence and subsequent cross-examination of the child witness (usually via the closed circuit television system) was also observed. The data base from the Lord Chancellor's Department of all trials involving child witnesses in England and Wales was also analysed. The results showed that the introduction of the video technology into the criminal courts reduced the levels of stress of child witnesses but did not increase the conviction rates.

child witnesses evaluation evidence videotape 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ceci, S. and M. Bruck, Jeopardy in the Courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Cashmore, J. and N. DeHass, The Use of Closed Circuit Television for Child Witnesses in the ACT. A Report for the Australian Law Reform Commission and the Australian Capital Territory Magistrates Court, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate, The Inspectorate's Report on Cases Involving Child Witnesses. London: CPS Inspectorate 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Davies, G.M., The impact of television on the presentation and reception of children's evidence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, G.M. and E. Noon, An Evaluation of the Live Link for Child Witnesses. London: Home Office, 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, G. and H. Westcott, Videotechnology and the child witness. In: H. Dent and R. Flin (Eds), Children as Witnesses. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, G.M., J.C. Wilson, R. Mitchell and J. Milsom, Videotaping Children's Evidence: An Evaluation. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Flin, R.H., G. Davies and A. Tarrant, The Child Witness. Final Report to the Scottish Home and Health Department. Grant 85/9290. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon's Institute of Technology, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman, G.S., The child witness: Conclusions and future directions for research and legal practice. Journal of Social Issues, 40, pp. 157–175 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Goodman, G., E. Taub, D. Jones, P. England, L. Port, L. Rudy and L. Prado, Testifying in criminal court. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(5), 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, G., M. Wilson, C. Hazen and R. Reed, Children's testimony nearly four years after the event. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Home Office, Report of the Advisory Group on Video Evidence. London: Home Office, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Home Office and Department of Health. The Memorandum of Good Practice on Video Recorded Interviews with Child Witnesses for Criminal Proceedings. London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
  14. Lipovsky, J., The impact on court on children: Research findings and practical recommendations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, pp. 238–257, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Lipovsky, J., R. Tidwell, J. Crisp, D. Kilpatrick, B. Saunders and V. Dawson, Child witnesses in criminal court: Descriptive information from three southern states. Law and Human Behavior, 16, pp. 635–650, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. McFarlane, K., Diagnositic evaluations and the use of videotapes in child sexual abuse cases. University of Miami Law Review, 40, pp. 135–165, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. Melton, G, G. Goodman, S. Kalichman, M. Levine, K. Saywitz and G. Koocher, Empirical research on child maltreatment and the law. Journal of Child Psychology, 24(Suppl.), pp. 47–77, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, J. The rights of child witnesses: Is the court a protector or perpetrator? New England Law Review, 17, pp. 643–717, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. Pipe, M.E. and J.C. Wilson, Cues and secrets: Influences on children's event reports. Developmental Psychology, 30, pp. 515–525, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Saywitz, K. and G. Goodman, Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practice implications. In: J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. Bulkey, C. Jenny and T. Reid (Eds), The APSAC Handbook of Child Maltreatment, pp. 297–318. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Saywitz, K.J. and L. Snyder, Improving children's testimony with preparation. In: G.S. Goodman and B.L. Bottoms (Eds), Child Victims, Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony, pp. 117–146. New York: Guilford, 1993.Google Scholar
  22. Swim, J.K., E. Borgida and K. McCoy, Videotaped versus in-court witness testimony: Does protecting the child witness jeopardise due process? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, pp. 603–631, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.C. Wilson
  • G.M. Davies

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations